Hi there!
First i really love what you did with the chart, but i was wondering why the dark version reverses the colors of the depth graph?
Topic: BitcoinWisdom.com - Live Bitcoin/LiteCoin Charts - page 109. (Read 502647 times)
Hey Bitcoinwisdom,
your Website is outstanding, best graphs i've ever seen!
I'm a premium User since a couple months now, and i don't see that changing!
Btw thanks for adding DOGE/BTC pair, any chance to get WDC/BTC?
your Website is outstanding, best graphs i've ever seen!
I'm a premium User since a couple months now, and i don't see that changing!
Btw thanks for adding DOGE/BTC pair, any chance to get WDC/BTC?
Hi, do you have an API or allow access to the historical data of the markets you have on there. I'm specifically looking for historical data from huobi. Thanks!!! Love the site.
Logarithmic as default would be a terrible choice, especially considering that the default time frame is a "narrow" one, ie one of the last hours or so.
Then it would almost look like linear anyways, so actually the linear scale would not be needed at all, it can be removed ;-) As of 8:58am ET, the new default difficulty in the earnings calculator here:
http://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty
seem to be a negative number?!?
Thank you for report. The bug is fixed. http://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty
seem to be a negative number?!?
As of 8:58am ET, the new default difficulty in the earnings calculator here:
http://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty
seem to be a negative number?!?
http://i650.photobucket.com/albums/uu229/ericisback1/2014-01-24_085727.jpg
http://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty
seem to be a negative number?!?
http://i650.photobucket.com/albums/uu229/ericisback1/2014-01-24_085727.jpg
Hi.
I think that when one changes the Scale from Normal to Logarithmic the Y axis labels do not change accordingly.
Yes, this is new, the tick marks are correct but not the labels. BTW it should not be called "Normal", it should be called "Linear" and the default for new users should be logarithmic since this is the only scale that actually makes sense for such kind of data.I think that when one changes the Scale from Normal to Logarithmic the Y axis labels do not change accordingly.
+1
Logarithmic as default would be a terrible choice, especially considering that the default time frame is a "narrow" one, ie one of the last hours or so.
Hi.
I think that when one changes the Scale from Normal to Logarithmic the Y axis labels do not change accordingly.
Yes, this is new, the tick marks are correct but not the labels. BTW it should not be called "Normal", it should be called "Linear" and the default for new users should be logarithmic since this is the only scale that actually makes sense for such kind of data.I think that when one changes the Scale from Normal to Logarithmic the Y axis labels do not change accordingly.
Hi There, thanks so much for adding Doge on Cryptsy!
Is it possible to add additional indicators like %R for example??
Maybe some other nice features from tradingview? Yes you should whitelabel your stuff out to these exchanges for a monthly/annual service/maitenence fee.
Is it possible to add additional indicators like %R for example??
Maybe some other nice features from tradingview? Yes you should whitelabel your stuff out to these exchanges for a monthly/annual service/maitenence fee.
I think you should sell your graphs to the exchanges so they could replace their shitty graphs..
Find some youtube videos of mtgox's office and you'll notice they are already using other people's graphs...
I think you should sell your graphs to the exchanges so they could replace their shitty graphs..
How about DOGE/LTC?
I'd really appreciate this as well.
Would it be possible to add NXT/BTC from Bter?
http://bter.com/api
http://bter.com/api/1/ticker/nxt_btc
http://bter.com/api/1/trade/nxt_btc
http://bter.com/api/1/depth/nxt_btc (Orderbook)
Thanks for your consideration!
http://bter.com/api
http://bter.com/api/1/ticker/nxt_btc
http://bter.com/api/1/trade/nxt_btc
http://bter.com/api/1/depth/nxt_btc (Orderbook)
Thanks for your consideration!
Hi.
I think that when one changes the Scale from Normal to Logarithmic the Y axis labels do not change accordingly.
Yes, this is new, the tick marks are correct but not the labels. BTW it should not be called "Normal", it should be called "Linear" and the default for new users should be logarithmic since this is the only scale that actually makes sense for such kind of data. I think that when one changes the Scale from Normal to Logarithmic the Y axis labels do not change accordingly.
Hi.
I think that when one changes the Scale from Normal to Logarithmic the Y axis labels do not change accordingly.
I think that when one changes the Scale from Normal to Logarithmic the Y axis labels do not change accordingly.
How about DOGE/LTC?
And can you put more data on the orderbook? Maybe scrollable or a dedicated page for the orderbook
And can you put more data on the orderbook? Maybe scrollable or a dedicated page for the orderbook
(note this image is from ClarkMoody... just to show what i mean)
ClarkMoody is actually grouping it wrong, see for example how goxtool (the reference for MtGox) does it. On both sides it should be summed up from the top of the book down¹ to (and including) the round level, this would then also be the same value you could read from a cumulative depth chart where it is summed up to and including that price. This means the number always represents the amount to buy (or sell) to break this price, its perfectly symmetrical.¹) Note that on the ask side "down" (deeper into the book) actually means the prices become higher, therefore the inverse sort order and usage of the next higher round price.
Some option to group SELL and BUY orders would be awesome...
I don't need to know the EXACT orders, only a avarage view...
grouped orders makes it easier to estimate the distribution of 'weight'
I KNOW that there already IS a grouped distribution to the right of the orders,
but imho it should be an option instead, and then only display one orderbook...
only showing the numbers once, also make room for other stuff.
(note this image is from ClarkMoody... just to show what i mean)
I don't need to know the EXACT orders, only a avarage view...
grouped orders makes it easier to estimate the distribution of 'weight'
I KNOW that there already IS a grouped distribution to the right of the orders,
but imho it should be an option instead, and then only display one orderbook...
only showing the numbers once, also make room for other stuff.
(note this image is from ClarkMoody... just to show what i mean)
I think this has come up previously in the thread.
Some people like it one way, others another.
Personally I find the current system more intuitive than Clarkmoody.
Some option to group SELL and BUY orders would be awesome...
I don't need to know the EXACT orders, only a avarage view...
grouped orders makes it easier to estimate the distribution of 'weight'
I KNOW that there already IS a grouped distribution to the right of the orders,
but imho it should be an option instead, and then only display one orderbook...
only showing the numbers once, also make room for other stuff.
(note this image is from ClarkMoody... just to show what i mean)
https://i.imgur.com/JN4XOkl.png
I don't need to know the EXACT orders, only a avarage view...
grouped orders makes it easier to estimate the distribution of 'weight'
I KNOW that there already IS a grouped distribution to the right of the orders,
but imho it should be an option instead, and then only display one orderbook...
only showing the numbers once, also make room for other stuff.
(note this image is from ClarkMoody... just to show what i mean)
https://i.imgur.com/JN4XOkl.png
Jump to: