BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys - page 30.

WanderingPhilospher

full member

Activity: 1162

Merit: 237

Shooters Shoot...

Quote from: Siberian047 on August 28, 2021, 05:45:54 PM

I am currently able to process 2^54.75 Keys/second using a program I've been writing that combines the best of Bitcrack with BSGS using GPU's, at the moment im only capable of getting these speeds while searching public keys, while searching public address compressed Im still getting about 2^38.127 Keys/second. I will be discussing this program more and maybe releasing a copy for public use after I find the 64 address!

What's the point of looking for 64 puzzle today? On the Internet, everyone is shouting that whoever finds 64 puzzle still won't get anything.Since there are many robots per transaction that work to intercept.
[/quote]
The only way someone can "intercept" is if when BTC moves from wallet, the pubkey will be exposed, and someone with kangaroo can quickly find the priv key. But many people have said to use electrum(?) and to uncheck the replace by fee option.

Siberian047

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

I am currently able to process 2^54.75 Keys/second using a program I've been writing that combines the best of Bitcrack with BSGS using GPU's, at the moment im only capable of getting these speeds while searching public keys, while searching public address compressed Im still getting about 2^38.127 Keys/second. I will be discussing this program more and maybe releasing a copy for public use after I find the 64 address!
[/quote]

What's the point of looking for 64 puzzle today? On the Internet, everyone is shouting that whoever finds 64 puzzle still won't get anything.Since there are many robots per transaction that work to intercept.

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

Quote from: Desyationer on August 24, 2021, 10:49:36 AM

I used to have a 2080 ti card - https://youtu.be/gCgdKkXcn9g and now I have a 3080ti - https://youtu.be/UNwMctHWkPI . I am disappointed with the result, I hoped for at least 1.5 gain at least ... Sad

LHR could be the reason?

Most likely. The newer shipments of 3080Ti were nerfed recently.

While we don't know the exact heuristics Nvidia drivers use to detect whatever they call "ethereum mining", it probably detects repeated hashing or ECC operations as well and throttles it. They did accidentally release a dev driver with the patch disabled (LOL!) so modding the driver is definitely possible albeit very difficult.

Desyationer

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

I used to have a 2080 ti card - https://youtu.be/gCgdKkXcn9g and now I have a 3080ti - https://youtu.be/UNwMctHWkPI . I am disappointed with the result, I hoped for at least 1.5 gain at least ... Sad

LHR could be the reason?

bigvito19

full member

Activity: 706

Merit: 111

Quote from: Minase on August 17, 2021, 01:46:48 AM

if the above message was for me,than no, i didn't find it.
over 600k addresses which are quite good (i can make statistics to see where the prefix was most common/uncommon).
I know that there is no direct relationship between address and "key space" but it's good to analyze.
i modified now the search and the estimate is ~ 25-30 days with a success rate of 2%.
i was quite thrilled when i saw the program found the following address "16jY7qLzk131JDX93LZSSfQQZAFjtthXQN" Grin

not many addresses in the 64 range that starts with 16jY7q and ends with XQN

Quote from: NotATether on June 13, 2021, 01:01:33 PM

Quote from: bigvito19 on June 13, 2021, 09:55:54 AM

How would I calculate how many combinations of 16jY7q would be in 2^64 range?

You can't, because there is no direct relation between an address/pubkeyhash and its private key.

It's the fact that the address is a hashed (and encoded) public key that makes it impossible to probe/guess the range of its private key. This also applies even if you have the end/middle of an address instead of the beginning of it.

Minase

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 43

if the above message was for me,than no, i didn't find it.
over 600k addresses which are quite good (i can make statistics to see where the prefix was most common/uncommon).
I know that there is no direct relationship between address and "key space" but it's good to analyze.
i modified now the search and the estimate is ~ 25-30 days with a success rate of 2%.
i was quite thrilled when i saw the program found the following address "16jY7qLzk131JDX93LZSSfQQZAFjtthXQN" Grin

not many addresses in the 64 range that starts with 16jY7q and ends with XQN

bigvito19

full member

Activity: 706

Merit: 111

Quote from: jacky19790729 on July 21, 2021, 09:20:21 AM

Quote from: Minase on July 21, 2021, 02:16:08 AM

I have generated almost 300.000 addresses starting with 16jY7q and still the 64 puzzle isn't among them.
Maybe soon i will find it Cheesy

The progress right now is over 70%... 5-6 days left to reach 100%. Ofcourse is not full keyspace search (dont have that many resources) but an improved search algorithm.

Code:

#64
from
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008000000000000000
to
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000010000000000000000

16jY7qL111111111111111111111111111 =hash160> 003EE4133D831A64D9DB3482984C1EDBBDBCE4B21678000000
16jY7qLzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz =hash160> 003EE4133DCAE1C772B44626BE1DE2197F8D2F780B9FFFFFFF
00FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
003EE4133DCAE1C772B44626BE1DE2197F8D2F780B9FFFFFFF - 003EE4133D831A64D9DB3482984C1EDBBDBCE4B21678000000 = 0x47C76298D911A425D1C33DC1D04AC5F527FFFFFF
00FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF / 0x47C76298D911A425D1C33DC1D04AC5F527FFFFFF = 0x39106D151

0x8000000000000000 / 0x39106D151 = 0x23E3B14C

Probability theory hash160 in #64 range
You will find N counts private key and Compressed Address is 16jY7qL****************** 7 Character match
N = 0x23E3B14C (HEX)
N = 602,124,620 (DEC)

I wonder what happened its almost a month later, did you ever find it?

sheryllmcnulty

newbie

Activity: 20

Merit: 11

I can't really find the source code for it. Has he shared it or did I miss out on something

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

Quote from: jacky19790729 on July 21, 2021, 11:09:35 AM

I try find 7 Characters match for 30 minutes use RTX3090 ~~ (16jY7qL*******************)
~

Without knowing what GPUs you used and how many, we can't do much with these probabilities since it's currently difficult to measure how fast a GPU can search X number of keys.

jacky19790729

jr. member

Activity: 82

Merit: 8

I try find 7 Characters match for 30 minutes use RTX3090 ~~ (16jY7qL*******************)

# VanitySearch-1.15.4_bitcrack.exe -t 0 -gpu -o _11111111t_7char.txt --keyspace CB80000000000000:CB80FFFFFFFFFFFF 16jY7qL
Difficulty: 15318045009
Search: 16jY7qL [Compressed]

from CB80000000000000 to CB8003487FF98800
I find 226 private keys (16jY7qL*******************)

0xCB8003487FF98800 - 0xCB80000000000000 = 0x3487FF98800
0x3487FF98800 / 0xE2 = 0x3B8121863

Probability theory hash160 will find 1 private key about every 0x39106D151 (16jY7qL**************** 7 Characters match )

Code:

0xCB800009008519A8,16jY7qLZgtn7h6acW4jobYarbvmZqg39Fb,2021-07-21 23:37:49,003ee4133dab8e722a3268f88aa4b2964c7c52019af34ea72e,,,,,,,,,
0xCB800012C3B69F15,16jY7qLD1YuadimEY6AvRRHViRqLT8oted,2021-07-21 23:37:53,003ee4133d91f733e35e52b4b2e6695f01d2f217e587e4e852,,,,,,,,,
0xCB80000B1BF8AD80,16jY7qLCFNeDtFFR547bDq3TWLajFmW1Pt,2021-07-21 23:37:58,003ee4133d9105e45d03d4fdfd16ae0aab19ba9fcbae230737,,,,,,,,,
0xCB80000E77DB89B4,16jY7qL5dv8gAukskWyriTmuRcoabkK5g1,2021-07-21 23:38:06,003ee4133d88d74f93adb088b35e796ce2a6a3f2d2acf0b966,,,,,,,,,
0xCB80000066AC3492,16jY7qLXa8fLwozRJesNW9s9ZF7ffP9H7L,2021-07-21 23:38:08,003ee4133da8efe2099908698cd161bf84b26f53298d65048f,,,,,,,,,
0xCB80001A2A10EFF8,16jY7qLRU7DvRo5VzTAabA8zeTrSWBVZQu,2021-07-21 23:38:21,003ee4133da1621248667f92d425d0bbcfb5ea821e380a62ca,,,,,,,,,
0xCB80001D5A42842D,16jY7qLxA78Nah9zUnLZ6G3KVVPPLzPbMS,2021-07-21 23:38:25,003ee4133dc75d110204ac3d574e06e6a8663a6d557b5412c9,,,,,,,,,
0xCB80001E5D64ECE5,16jY7qLTrnsEnvuTWYUhv6eUMANL2aGM3T,2021-07-21 23:38:32,003ee4133da4579c6483851039bcff6370b3aae091b20e3ca6,,,,,,,,,
....
....
....
0xCB80032EBE85162C,16jY7qLnFC1hTNG7wo5gMwrtV8huT3RuwM,2021-07-22 00:44:22,003ee4133dbb18ab1f767006d52c2176be85040dacadd713c0,,,,,,,,,
0xCB8003366BCB5F28,16jY7qLhCZyXdjSk1UVbspohAM2k374cmx,2021-07-22 00:44:39,003ee4133db4da43cce11cc1ec0e6469584ab621756790b373,,,,,,,,,
0xCB8003422CCFF66E,16jY7qL4kFH8YxZrEBEPbYGvNs1PHyjMs1,2021-07-22 00:44:52,003ee4133d87bd1237454df90f9d391954dbe88eb625388bb4,,,,,,,,,
0xCB80033639719039,16jY7qL5B1rDpk6EJ17QKfZoQ6oRjjzdk7,2021-07-22 00:44:56,003ee4133d88445d8cf57085e3418911a1b0c71adb2a4ff29c,,,,,,,,,
0xCB800335E8339064,16jY7qLodqSeiAtrY6hGjP6mXF6Ascni8u,2021-07-22 00:45:01,003ee4133dbcd12eb9bb457e56fc48ee346f7520d6501a56c6,,,,,,,,,
0xCB80034838448608,16jY7qLqbw9bioBexrLkveDm1jsiVengtF,2021-07-22 00:45:04,003ee4133dbf406ddcf1227ebcf3f76bc4acb257e0fa9f7d30,,,,,,,,,
0xCB8003415CB5C9E2,16jY7qLppnCGd31T5z3tryhYAb2Nuxs7L4,2021-07-22 00:45:07,003ee4133dbe49c793d75fb0aa11be040c91fce5613ea3b7a9,,,,,,,,,
0xCB8003426F85F8BC,16jY7qLvhaouwggXUgscdRTVaaN8xWXmSb,2021-07-22 00:45:08,003ee4133dc58f5f6a042f3099722ac6e5227e97a1ab8bfc1c,,,,,,,,,
0xCB80033B70E63A78,16jY7qLntazZwyNGQrQnryLGyDkk9DCCfW,2021-07-22 00:45:08,003ee4133dbbe4f0ab1e04123cda0cbcbbd8a1a38e2f75e2fd,,,,,,,,,
0xCB80034156C8383B,16jY7qLVDunZLRUAMjmjTV8bLDFYGiP2gW,2021-07-22 00:45:14,003ee4133da607ca0545554a36dae4056be03904e3725e6037,,,,,,,,,

Total: 226 private key

Minase

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 43

Thank you for the probability, from my calculations and if the distribution is uniform i should have over 14.000.000.000 addresses matching the 5 digits prefix (excluding network bytes, the 1 at the beginning ) 16jY7q .

//edit
I think your calculations are a bit off.
First, they are for the full range and second the values seems a little small.

jacky19790729

jr. member

Activity: 82

Merit: 8

Quote from: Minase on July 21, 2021, 02:16:08 AM

I have generated almost 300.000 addresses starting with 16jY7q and still the 64 puzzle isn't among them.
Maybe soon i will find it Cheesy

The progress right now is over 70%... 5-6 days left to reach 100%. Ofcourse is not full keyspace search (dont have that many resources) but an improved search algorithm.

Code:

#64
from
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008000000000000000
to
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000010000000000000000

16jY7qL111111111111111111111111111 =hash160> 003EE4133D831A64D9DB3482984C1EDBBDBCE4B21678000000
16jY7qLzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz =hash160> 003EE4133DCAE1C772B44626BE1DE2197F8D2F780B9FFFFFFF
00FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
003EE4133DCAE1C772B44626BE1DE2197F8D2F780B9FFFFFFF - 003EE4133D831A64D9DB3482984C1EDBBDBCE4B21678000000 = 0x47C76298D911A425D1C33DC1D04AC5F527FFFFFF
00FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF / 0x47C76298D911A425D1C33DC1D04AC5F527FFFFFF = 0x39106D151

0x8000000000000000 / 0x39106D151 = 0x23E3B14C

Probability theory hash160 in #64 range
You will find N counts private key and Compressed Address is 16jY7qL****************** 7 Character match
N = 0x23E3B14C (HEX)
N = 602,124,620 (DEC)

Minase

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 43

I have generated almost 300.000 addresses starting with 16jY7q and still the 64 puzzle isn't among them.
Maybe soon i will find it Cheesy

The progress right now is over 70%... 5-6 days left to reach 100%. Ofcourse is not full keyspace search (dont have that many resources) but an improved search algorithm.

Desyationer

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

Quote from: jacky19790729 on July 20, 2021, 12:57:37 PM

Quote from: Desyationer on July 19, 2021, 06:17:19 AM

How many mkeys can 3070,3080,3090 do now with one adress and -c mode? cuda or opecl only?
I have 2080ti and ~1500mkeys cuda mode. 1080ti is only 700Mkeys? Tesla v100 is same that 2080ti?

[VanitySearch-1.15.4_bitcrack]

I use RTX 3090 about 2275 MKey/s

Thank you, now I see no reason to pay twice for 3080ti with a similar performance of 3090. Perhaps even 2000-2100 and not 2275.

bitcrack 2080ti mkey test - https://youtu.be/gCgdKkXcn9g

jacky19790729

jr. member

Activity: 82

Merit: 8

Quote from: Desyationer on July 19, 2021, 06:17:19 AM

How many mkeys can 3070,3080,3090 do now with one adress and -c mode? cuda or opecl only?
I have 2080ti and ~1500mkeys cuda mode. 1080ti is only 700Mkeys? Tesla v100 is same that 2080ti?

[VanitySearch-1.15.4_bitcrack]

I use RTX 3090 about 2275 MKey/s

Desyationer

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

How many mkeys can 3070,3080,3090 do now with one adress and -c mode? cuda or opecl only?
I have 2080ti and ~1500mkeys cuda mode. 1080ti is only 700Mkeys? Tesla v100 is same that 2080ti?

WanderingPhilospher

full member

Activity: 1162

Merit: 237

Shooters Shoot...

Quote from: zahid888 on July 17, 2021, 12:01:20 PM

Quote from: COBRAS on July 15, 2021, 06:09:30 PM

Quote from: NotATether on July 15, 2021, 05:39:30 PM

Quote from: COBRAS on July 15, 2021, 01:26:44 PM

Quote from: zahid888 on July 14, 2021, 09:12:12 AM

~

Were you get this SCAM pic ?

He changed the numbers himself using Chrome DevTools (inspect element).

This is now a popular method of many scammers provide fake pic. bee careful !!!

bee careful !!!

Lolllll Cheesy

It was just a joke. Maybe you do not know where you are, and which people you are telling to be careful, this is a community of programmers, where such small tricks are just taken for fun. So don't prove your stupidity with these childish talks.

Sometimes people read to quickly or not enough. In your original post, I read the words "Will we ever see this...." the keyword being "Will" so I took as you just asking a question if one will ever find #64's key, nothing scammy, just a question.

I'd say probably...or more than likely, one day; either when enough people join pool/concentrate all their firepower in one place, or equipment or software becomes faster.

zahid888

member

Activity: 275

Merit: 20

the right steps towerds the goal

Quote from: COBRAS on July 15, 2021, 06:09:30 PM

Quote from: NotATether on July 15, 2021, 05:39:30 PM

Quote from: COBRAS on July 15, 2021, 01:26:44 PM

Quote from: zahid888 on July 14, 2021, 09:12:12 AM

~

Were you get this SCAM pic ?

He changed the numbers himself using Chrome DevTools (inspect element).

This is now a popular method of many scammers provide fake pic. bee careful !!!

bee careful !!!

Lolllll Cheesy

It was just a joke. Maybe you do not know where you are, and which people you are telling to be careful, this is a community of programmers, where such small tricks are just taken for fun. So don't prove your stupidity with these childish talks.

COBRAS

member

Activity: 873

Merit: 22

$$P2P BTC BRUTE.JOIN NOW ! https://uclck.me/SQPJk