hello,
Finally, it works ! But I had to split the kernel in 2...
You can see a fonctional code for the new drivers here : https://github.com/ByLamacq/BitCrack
Benchmark with drivers 160.32 and Cuda 11.2 on ubuntu :
- RTX 2080 => 800 MKeys /s
- RTX 3090 => 1800 MKeys/s
Can you build and try this ?
Thx
Topic: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys - page 39. (Read 76850 times)
Is there any way to guess any letters of key 64, As on the basis of similarities between these two keys ?
16jY7qLJnxb7CHZyqBP8qca9d51gAjyXQN -
16jY7qLJnxLQQRYPX5BLuCtcBs6tvXz8BE - 3AD3536AEA8CEB2B0
16jY7qLJnx2EZZumnYFke3GutCrRnHKs1M - 7013536A91A6441B0
Can anyone have CPU 20 Core 40 Thread Help to test bitcrack only CPU How many speed can make on CPU 20 Core 40 Thread ?
There's no way to perform this benchmark, because Bitcrack only has a GPU solver.
now is bad time for buy GPU
all GTX 30xx out of stock
GTX 30xx GTX 20xx GTX 10xx all out of stock same
all GPU can use CUDA (support 3.0 up) out of stock
both Nvidia and AMD too, price is very high over real normal price should be
computer set bundle GPU is same out of stock
include laptop high GPU is out of stock
second hand GPU same sold out
all GTX 30xx out of stock
GTX 30xx GTX 20xx GTX 10xx all out of stock same
all GPU can use CUDA (support 3.0 up) out of stock
both Nvidia and AMD too, price is very high over real normal price should be
computer set bundle GPU is same out of stock
include laptop high GPU is out of stock
second hand GPU same sold out
This is (thankfully) not because of miner abuse, but because there's a TSMC chip shortage, which is also affecting ASICs etc.
It’s pretty sad people ask me to run crap like that. I’ve no idea what I’m running without source code. I’m honestly blown away this is even allowed on this forum.
The big problem is that there's usually no way to verify that you're not running malware, given the abundance of malware add-one available for Windows on the darknet.
I recommend not running any .exe-only programs unless the developers sign a PGP message with checksums (this is what PhoenixMiner devs do), or just PGP sign the .exe themselves.
Normally when people make a Windows binary like this they just make an empty Github project with a README so they can stick the .exe as a Github release. We saw this in sp-mod and honestly it was annoying as hell.
It’s pretty sad people ask me to run crap like that. I’ve no idea what I’m running without source code. I’m honestly blown away this is even allowed on this forum.
Can anyone have CPU 20 Core 40 Thread Help to test bitcrack only CPU How many speed can make on CPU 20 Core 40 Thread ?
may be not CPU 20 Core 40 Thread but high core CPU 16 Core 32 Thread or 24 Core 48 Thread
How compare CPU high tread can compare with what GPU can work for same speed?
now is bad time for buy GPU
all GTX 30xx out of stock
GTX 30xx GTX 20xx GTX 10xx all out of stock same
all GPU can use CUDA (support 3.0 up) out of stock
both Nvidia and AMD too, price is very high over real normal price should be
computer set bundle GPU is same out of stock
include laptop high GPU is out of stock
second hand GPU same sold out
Normally when people make a Windows binary like this they just make an empty Github project with a README so they can stick the .exe as a Github release. We saw this in sp-mod and honestly it was annoying as hell.
renedx // hi, dont have a windows could you send me the source so can compile for linux on R TX 3000 cards thanks 
The zip doesn’t contain a source sadly enough.
renedx // hi, dont have a windows could you send me the source so can compile for linux on R TX 3000 cards thanks
https://github.com/richieburns/BitCrack_AMP/releases/download/v1.0.0_AMP/BitCrack_AMP.zip
Bitcrack CUDA 11.2 Compute 8.6 Win10
Would appreciate some benchmarks for RTX 30 series cards.....
Cheers
Bitcrack CUDA 11.2 Compute 8.6 Win10
Would appreciate some benchmarks for RTX 30 series cards.....
Cheers
Works, 3080 without OC does ~1800MKey/s.
With OC ~2000MKey/s
Old bitcrack CL does ~1650MKey/s.
...
I want to understand because I don't have this problem with the same kernels with my platform test with pyCuda.
I want to understand because I don't have this problem with the same kernels with my platform test with pyCuda.
Mate, if I knew precisely why these cards were jacking out, I wouldn't have taken so many months to roll out my own patch. The truth is, the best I know about this problem is the cicc compiler from CUDA is mixing around function PTX definitions as part of its "optimization" and somewhere along that line, it places some piece of function on a 32-bit boundary (apparently the RTX cards no longer support 32-bit boundaries).
That's why completely disabling cicc optimization fixes the problem albeit kills the performance of Bitcrack. It is how my aforementioned patch works, but clearly richie's is superior to mine in terms of speed.
Hello,
So, can you tell us more about the code problem ?
Thank you.
So, can you tell us more about the code problem ?
Thank you.
At some point, Nvidia made a change in the way their newer GPUs ran CUDA code which causes a fatal Misaligned Access error when starting Bitcrack, and he apparently made a patch for it that he wants us to test.
(Don't have RTX 3000 GPUs to test with, sorry richie.)
Thx, but yes I know for the new drivers problem with RTX2000 and RTX3000. (I don't have this problem with an gtx 1050ti with new drivers...)
I have a RTX2080 and a RTX3090 so I tried to solved the problem and so I want to understand where is the problem... ^^'
I find and solved problem with constants pointers but I block on an error in sha function... I have a problem with the variables a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h...
I want to understand because I don't have this problem with the same kernels with my platform test with pyCuda.
Hello,
So, can you tell us more about the code problem ?
Thank you.
So, can you tell us more about the code problem ?
Thank you.
At some point, Nvidia made a change in the way their newer GPUs ran CUDA code which causes a fatal Misaligned Access error when starting Bitcrack, and he apparently made a patch for it that he wants us to test.
(Don't have RTX 3000 GPUs to test with, sorry richie.)
https://github.com/richieburns/BitCrack_AMP/releases/download/v1.0.0_AMP/BitCrack_AMP.zip
Bitcrack CUDA 11.2 Compute 8.6 Win10
Would appreciate some benchmarks for RTX 30 series cards.....
Cheers
Bitcrack CUDA 11.2 Compute 8.6 Win10
Would appreciate some benchmarks for RTX 30 series cards.....
Cheers
Hello,
So, can you tell us more about the code problem ?
Thank you.
What performance maximum bitcrack can do on there card?
GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3090
or
GeForce RTX 30xx
and if price on market is over price most out of stock, if buy GeForce RTX 2080 x 2 double card is ok or not (if can find tow)
most sold out all (or sale with computer build-in)
GeForce RTX 30xx sold out
GeForce RTX 20xx sold out
GeForce RTX 10xx sold out
GeForce RTX 1080 ti x 4 card ok or not (very old card/ if can find / may be second hand)
I looking for card support with can do machine learning (high cuda core) main use not for bitcrack
bitcrack just hobby
okay that with il and 0o i understand but if i change the sourcecode with other since it dont work. is it maybe possible to leave the 8 and 9 and add an 0 like "01234567ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijkmnopqrstuvwxyz"
That's not possible. The base58 encoding is like an alphabet, it cannot be changed because that's how it's defined in the BIP for it and also the various encoders out there would not be patched for such a change in letters.
for the octal numbers if someone read this and have knowledge please let me know.
It's technically possible but why would you want to do that though? Octal numbers take up more space to spell out on the command line and also in output.
is there any way to let bitcrack work with octal and not hexdecimal to create and check the adresses?
IIRC it's not possible unless you modify the source code to support octal
and one more questions why in base58 the code uses "123456789ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijkmnopqrstuvwxyz" why the IO l and 0 (zero) is missing?
Because those 4 character are visually similar. Here's information from https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Base58Check_encoding#Background
Code:
// Why base-58 instead of standard base-64 encoding?
// - Don't want 0OIl characters that look the same in some fonts and
// could be used to create visually identical looking account numbers.
// - A string with non-alphanumeric characters is not as easily accepted as an account number.
// - E-mail usually won't line-break if there's no punctuation to break at.
// - Doubleclicking selects the whole number as one word if it's all alphanumeric.
// - Don't want 0OIl characters that look the same in some fonts and
// could be used to create visually identical looking account numbers.
// - A string with non-alphanumeric characters is not as easily accepted as an account number.
// - E-mail usually won't line-break if there's no punctuation to break at.
// - Doubleclicking selects the whole number as one word if it's all alphanumeric.
okay that with il and 0o i understand but if i change the sourcecode with other since it dont work. is it maybe possible to leave the 8 and 9 and add an 0 like "01234567ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijkmnopqrstuvwxyz"
for the octal numbers if someone read this and have knowledge please let me know.
is there any way to let bitcrack work with octal and not hexdecimal to create and check the adresses?
and one more questions why in base58 the code uses "123456789ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijkmnopqrstuvwxyz" why the IO l and 0 (zero) is missing?
and one more questions why in base58 the code uses "123456789ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijkmnopqrstuvwxyz" why the IO l and 0 (zero) is missing?
thanks
so if i will solve the puzzle #64 i have to start with that parameter...
cuBitCrack.exe --keyspace 8000000000000000:ffffffffffffffff 16jY7qLJnxb7CHZyqBP8qca9d51gAjyXQN
is that right?
other question: if i have tweo cards in my system, can i user all cards parallel?
ID: 0
Name: GeForce RTX 3070
Memory: 8192MB
Compute units: 46
ID: 1
Name: GeForce RTX 3070
Memory: 8192MB
Compute units: 46
so if i will solve the puzzle #64 i have to start with that parameter...
cuBitCrack.exe --keyspace 8000000000000000:ffffffffffffffff 16jY7qLJnxb7CHZyqBP8qca9d51gAjyXQN
is that right?
other question: if i have tweo cards in my system, can i user all cards parallel?
ID: 0
Name: GeForce RTX 3070
Memory: 8192MB
Compute units: 46
ID: 1
Name: GeForce RTX 3070
Memory: 8192MB
Compute units: 46
Correct on parameters; but you will need to play with the -b -t -p settings to maximize your cards.
You can't run both cards in same range at same time like -d 0,1; but you can split the range in to 2 ranges and run each card in separate range.
Example:
Code:
cuBitCrack.exe -d 0 --keyspace 8000000000000000:bfffffffffffffff 16jY7qLJnxb7CHZyqBP8qca9d51gAjyXQN
Code:
cuBitCrack.exe -d 1 --keyspace c000000000000000:ffffffffffffffff 16jY7qLJnxb7CHZyqBP8qca9d51gAjyXQN
or however you want to break up the range(s)
thanks
so if i will solve the puzzle #64 i have to start with that parameter...
cuBitCrack.exe --keyspace 8000000000000000:ffffffffffffffff 16jY7qLJnxb7CHZyqBP8qca9d51gAjyXQN
is that right?
other question: if i have tweo cards in my system, can i user all cards parallel?
ID: 0
Name: GeForce RTX 3070
Memory: 8192MB
Compute units: 46
ID: 1
Name: GeForce RTX 3070
Memory: 8192MB
Compute units: 46
so if i will solve the puzzle #64 i have to start with that parameter...
cuBitCrack.exe --keyspace 8000000000000000:ffffffffffffffff 16jY7qLJnxb7CHZyqBP8qca9d51gAjyXQN
is that right?
other question: if i have tweo cards in my system, can i user all cards parallel?
ID: 0
Name: GeForce RTX 3070
Memory: 8192MB
Compute units: 46
ID: 1
Name: GeForce RTX 3070
Memory: 8192MB
Compute units: 46
Jump to: