I am always impressed with the rocket engineer level discussions in this thread and the puzzle one.
I know a large number of the puzzle ?wallets? have been cracked with this, correct? The prize is then able to be self claimed because with the private key, it would be the same as having the wallet.dat correct?
Topic: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys - page 46. (Read 76850 times)
old one BitCrack-master compile error
G:\BitCrack-master\BitCrack-master\CudaKeySearchDevice\CudaKeySearchDevice.vcxproj(59,5): error MSB4019: The imported project "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.1.props" was not found. Confirm that the expression in the Import declaration "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.1.props" is correct, and that the file exists on disk.
new one BitCrack-3000-master compile error
G:\BitCrack-3000-master\BitCrack-3000-master\CudaKeySearchDevice\CudaKeySearchDevice.vcxproj(59,5): error MSB4019: The imported project "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.2.props" was not found. Confirm that the expression in the Import declaration "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.2.props" is correct, and that the file exists on disk.
what can i do
G:\BitCrack-master\BitCrack-master\CudaKeySearchDevice\CudaKeySearchDevice.vcxproj(59,5): error MSB4019: The imported project "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.1.props" was not found. Confirm that the expression in the Import declaration "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.1.props" is correct, and that the file exists on disk.
new one BitCrack-3000-master compile error
G:\BitCrack-3000-master\BitCrack-3000-master\CudaKeySearchDevice\CudaKeySearchDevice.vcxproj(59,5): error MSB4019: The imported project "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.2.props" was not found. Confirm that the expression in the Import declaration "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.2.props" is correct, and that the file exists on disk.
what can i do
Try install CUDA 10.1
install CUDA 10.1 only don't use CUDA 10.2
I have problem before I install CUDA 11.2
then I install CUDA 10.2 I thin newest may be better
after that I install CUDA 10.1 again
I install drive 3 time each time download 2Gb large file
that source code need only CUDA 10.1
Good to hear that speeds aren't abysmal on GeForce cards. Maybe it was because I used the default points/blocks/threads and never bothered turning them for my Tesla card.
On V100 speed is drastically slower than normal:
Tesla V100-SXM2- 10809 / 16160MB | 1 target 224.55 MKey/s (6,422,528,000 total) [00:00:26]
old one BitCrack-master compile error
G:\BitCrack-master\BitCrack-master\CudaKeySearchDevice\CudaKeySearchDevice.vcxproj(59,5): error MSB4019: The imported project "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.1.props" was not found. Confirm that the expression in the Import declaration "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.1.props" is correct, and that the file exists on disk.
new one BitCrack-3000-master compile error
G:\BitCrack-3000-master\BitCrack-3000-master\CudaKeySearchDevice\CudaKeySearchDevice.vcxproj(59,5): error MSB4019: The imported project "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.2.props" was not found. Confirm that the expression in the Import declaration "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.2.props" is correct, and that the file exists on disk.
what can i do
You do not have 10.1 or 10.2 props installed. G:\BitCrack-master\BitCrack-master\CudaKeySearchDevice\CudaKeySearchDevice.vcxproj(59,5): error MSB4019: The imported project "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.1.props" was not found. Confirm that the expression in the Import declaration "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.1.props" is correct, and that the file exists on disk.
new one BitCrack-3000-master compile error
G:\BitCrack-3000-master\BitCrack-3000-master\CudaKeySearchDevice\CudaKeySearchDevice.vcxproj(59,5): error MSB4019: The imported project "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.2.props" was not found. Confirm that the expression in the Import declaration "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.2.props" is correct, and that the file exists on disk.
what can i do
old one BitCrack-master compile error
G:\BitCrack-master\BitCrack-master\CudaKeySearchDevice\CudaKeySearchDevice.vcxproj(59,5): error MSB4019: The imported project "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.1.props" was not found. Confirm that the expression in the Import declaration "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.1.props" is correct, and that the file exists on disk.
new one BitCrack-3000-master compile error
G:\BitCrack-3000-master\BitCrack-3000-master\CudaKeySearchDevice\CudaKeySearchDevice.vcxproj(59,5): error MSB4019: The imported project "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.2.props" was not found. Confirm that the expression in the Import declaration "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.2.props" is correct, and that the file exists on disk.
what can i do
G:\BitCrack-master\BitCrack-master\CudaKeySearchDevice\CudaKeySearchDevice.vcxproj(59,5): error MSB4019: The imported project "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.1.props" was not found. Confirm that the expression in the Import declaration "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.1.props" is correct, and that the file exists on disk.
new one BitCrack-3000-master compile error
G:\BitCrack-3000-master\BitCrack-3000-master\CudaKeySearchDevice\CudaKeySearchDevice.vcxproj(59,5): error MSB4019: The imported project "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.2.props" was not found. Confirm that the expression in the Import declaration "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.2.props" is correct, and that the file exists on disk.
what can i do
It is also possible to bring a AMD Radeon RX 6800 also to work good or do you prefer GTX with CUDA? I can get 8GB with GTX or 16GB with AMD for same price.
Obviously you can't run cuBitCrack on AMD cards. The only choices is clBitCrack, but being alpha software it's provided "as is", ie it may not work at all.
Will it also have an effect if i use another prozessor maybe with 18 cores?
Bitcrack can't run on CPUs yet, and for the other two GPU-based crackers, having many cores makes little difference to the speed.
EDIT: I think I left a bunch of debug printf statements around the error checking parts of the code, so if anybody gets any build errors, it's probably those. I need to remove them when I have the time.
EDIT2:
Thank you for your optimizations, i tested it and from 610-615/MK now i have 700-720MK/s (impressive). RTX 2060
Also i found a bug in random mode (i will try to fix it and maybe do a PR to github, never codded in C/C++, other languages like C#/PHP)
The problem with random is that the keyspace ending is ignored and the keys will increase above the predefined range.
Also i found a bug in random mode (i will try to fix it and maybe do a PR to github, never codded in C/C++, other languages like C#/PHP)
The problem with random is that the keyspace ending is ignored and the keys will increase above the predefined range.
I completely missed your comment the first time
sorry.Good to hear that speeds aren't abysmal on GeForce cards. Maybe it was because I used the default points/blocks/threads and never bothered turning them for my Tesla card.
Random mode wasn't coded by me, I recall there was another guy here who made a fork with those additions, so I based my work on his fork.
old one BitCrack-master compile error
G:\BitCrack-master\BitCrack-master\CudaKeySearchDevice\CudaKeySearchDevice.vcxproj(59,5): error MSB4019: The imported project "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.1.props" was not found. Confirm that the expression in the Import declaration "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.1.props" is correct, and that the file exists on disk.
G:\BitCrack-master\BitCrack-master\CudaKeySearchDevice\CudaKeySearchDevice.vcxproj(59,5): error MSB4019: The imported project "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.1.props" was not found. Confirm that the expression in the Import declaration "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v160\\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 10.1.props" is correct, and that the file exists on disk.
Christ, I think I need to compile on Windows for myself to see what's going on with that OS
So it looks like that BitCrack hates any kind of cicc optimization and will immediately throw a misaligned address even on optimization level 1.
Ptxas optimization still works though, and setting it to the default level 3 triples the speed on my T4. Now before anyone gets excited about this, the speed still sucks compared to older cards (only 60MKeys/s now).
Meanwhile I have pushed the updates to https://github.com/ZenulAbidin/BitCrack-3000
Go get 'em boys.
Ptxas optimization still works though, and setting it to the default level 3 triples the speed on my T4. Now before anyone gets excited about this, the speed still sucks compared to older cards (only 60MKeys/s now).
Meanwhile I have pushed the updates to https://github.com/ZenulAbidin/BitCrack-3000
Go get 'em boys.
Thank you for your optimizations, i tested it and from 610-615/MK now i have 700-720MK/s (impressive). RTX 2060
Also i found a bug in random mode (i will try to fix it and maybe do a PR to github, never codded in C/C++, other languages like C#/PHP)
The problem with random is that the keyspace ending is ignored and the keys will increase above the predefined range.
Excellent... Now I am waiting for such an important person. Who will come and compile it in the Windows version. I think someone must have done this work. I request him to share it with us. So that we can see different results and benchmarks..
what do you mean with Windows Version? you can run it with cmd??
i have some question people, what is the best way if i have an adress for example: 1JH62p5xoFK4jtApBHZdU5xbuUBbHJqznX how is the best way to find the privat key?
and how i must setup the --keyspace?
in hex i have this output 00bd84fe5b326a4e728f21d597f45811f872fe89b7835ab764 is it important for the range or keyspace?
So it looks like that BitCrack hates any kind of cicc optimization and will immediately throw a misaligned address even on optimization level 1.
Ptxas optimization still works though, and setting it to the default level 3 triples the speed on my T4. Now before anyone gets excited about this, the speed still sucks compared to older cards (only 60MKeys/s now).
Meanwhile I have pushed the updates to https://github.com/ZenulAbidin/BitCrack-3000
Go get 'em boys.
Ptxas optimization still works though, and setting it to the default level 3 triples the speed on my T4. Now before anyone gets excited about this, the speed still sucks compared to older cards (only 60MKeys/s now).
Meanwhile I have pushed the updates to https://github.com/ZenulAbidin/BitCrack-3000
Go get 'em boys.
Excellent... Now I am waiting for such an important person. Who will come and compile it in the Windows version. I think someone must have done this work. I request him to share it with us. So that we can see different results and benchmarks..
Been following this thread for some time now.
Was running cuBitCrack on Windows with a Geforce GTX 1650 card. Using Nvidia 452.06 and Cuda 10.2.89. It did work and got around 49 Mkeys/s with cuBitCrack-0.32a 64/128/3200 settings and 634000 targets (compressed and uncompressed).
Don't recall how much on a single compressed target and don't want to take the computer apart just for that.
Bought yesterday an Asus RTX 3060 12 Gb. Off course the Nvidia 452.06 didn't work. Tried 457.30 as well with nil luck. Next step was 461.72 together with Cuda 11.2.2 and can confirm it does run with clBitCrack. However cuBitCrack doesn't work with current setup. At least not for me.
So at the moment I get 150 Mkeys/s on a Windows 10 Pro 64 (20H2), Nvidia 461.72 and Cuda 11.2.2 using clBitCrack (Yoydapros version v11.2-beta) settings 224/512/800 with 634000 targets (compressed and uncompressed). Its calculated to 91,750,400 starting points. If I try to push the slightest on any of the -b/-t/-p settings it gets an error.
Single compressed target gets 730 Mkeys/s with same settings.
I guess I should be happy getting three times the higher speed with the 3060 and running clBitCrack. Would like to try a working cuBitCrack to see if any difference. Does anybody know if there is a Cuda version BitCrack that works with RTX 3060 or higher?
Was running cuBitCrack on Windows with a Geforce GTX 1650 card. Using Nvidia 452.06 and Cuda 10.2.89. It did work and got around 49 Mkeys/s with cuBitCrack-0.32a 64/128/3200 settings and 634000 targets (compressed and uncompressed).
Don't recall how much on a single compressed target and don't want to take the computer apart just for that.
Bought yesterday an Asus RTX 3060 12 Gb. Off course the Nvidia 452.06 didn't work. Tried 457.30 as well with nil luck. Next step was 461.72 together with Cuda 11.2.2 and can confirm it does run with clBitCrack. However cuBitCrack doesn't work with current setup. At least not for me.
So at the moment I get 150 Mkeys/s on a Windows 10 Pro 64 (20H2), Nvidia 461.72 and Cuda 11.2.2 using clBitCrack (Yoydapros version v11.2-beta) settings 224/512/800 with 634000 targets (compressed and uncompressed). Its calculated to 91,750,400 starting points. If I try to push the slightest on any of the -b/-t/-p settings it gets an error.
Single compressed target gets 730 Mkeys/s with same settings.
I guess I should be happy getting three times the higher speed with the 3060 and running clBitCrack. Would like to try a working cuBitCrack to see if any difference. Does anybody know if there is a Cuda version BitCrack that works with RTX 3060 or higher?
will it work with 1 target and 730 Mkeys/s?
I think About buying an GTX 3070 do anybody know how many keys/s it can load? i have seen an answear with 1080 ti and 500mio keys/s will the 3070 find more maybe?
It is also possible to bring a AMD Radeon RX 6800 also to work good or do you prefer GTX with CUDA? I can get 8GB with GTX or 16GB with AMD for same price.
Will it also have an effect if i use another prozessor maybe with 18 cores?
Since we are in the Bitrack forum, I imagine you are wanting to use it. Currently, the RTX 30xx cards are not supported with Bitcrack. The AMD cards do not perform well with the openCL version of bitcrack and you have to make sure you are using a version that actually finds the keys.It is also possible to bring a AMD Radeon RX 6800 also to work good or do you prefer GTX with CUDA? I can get 8GB with GTX or 16GB with AMD for same price.
Will it also have an effect if i use another prozessor maybe with 18 cores?
All things equal, and if it worked, the 3070 should get a little more MKey/s than a 2080Ti.
Is there any 3000 edition that works? i mean someone here has posted a result with gtx 3060 and 800mio keys/s.
i am not inside this forum since beginning i am here since 3 days.
I think About buying an GTX 3070 do anybody know how many keys/s it can load? i have seen an answear with 1080 ti and 500mio keys/s will the 3070 find more maybe?
It is also possible to bring a AMD Radeon RX 6800 also to work good or do you prefer GTX with CUDA? I can get 8GB with GTX or 16GB with AMD for same price.
Will it also have an effect if i use another prozessor maybe with 18 cores?
Since we are in the Bitrack forum, I imagine you are wanting to use it. Currently, the RTX 30xx cards are not supported with Bitcrack. The AMD cards do not perform well with the openCL version of bitcrack and you have to make sure you are using a version that actually finds the keys.It is also possible to bring a AMD Radeon RX 6800 also to work good or do you prefer GTX with CUDA? I can get 8GB with GTX or 16GB with AMD for same price.
Will it also have an effect if i use another prozessor maybe with 18 cores?
All things equal, and if it worked, the 3070 should get a little more MKey/s than a 2080Ti.
Is there any 3000 edition that works? i mean someone here has posted a result with gtx 3060 and 800mio keys/s.
i am not inside this forum since beginning i am here since 3 days.
I think About buying an GTX 3070 do anybody know how many keys/s it can load? i have seen an answear with 1080 ti and 500mio keys/s will the 3070 find more maybe?
It is also possible to bring a AMD Radeon RX 6800 also to work good or do you prefer GTX with CUDA? I can get 8GB with GTX or 16GB with AMD for same price.
Will it also have an effect if i use another prozessor maybe with 18 cores?
Since we are in the Bitrack forum, I imagine you are wanting to use it. Currently, the RTX 30xx cards are not supported with Bitcrack. The AMD cards do not perform well with the openCL version of bitcrack and you have to make sure you are using a version that actually finds the keys.It is also possible to bring a AMD Radeon RX 6800 also to work good or do you prefer GTX with CUDA? I can get 8GB with GTX or 16GB with AMD for same price.
Will it also have an effect if i use another prozessor maybe with 18 cores?
All things equal, and if it worked, the 3070 should get a little more MKey/s than a 2080Ti.
I think About buying an GTX 3070 do anybody know how many keys/s it can load? i have seen an answear with 1080 ti and 500mio keys/s will the 3070 find more maybe?
It is also possible to bring a AMD Radeon RX 6800 also to work good or do you prefer GTX with CUDA? I can get 8GB with GTX or 16GB with AMD for same price.
Will it also have an effect if i use another prozessor maybe with 18 cores?
It is also possible to bring a AMD Radeon RX 6800 also to work good or do you prefer GTX with CUDA? I can get 8GB with GTX or 16GB with AMD for same price.
Will it also have an effect if i use another prozessor maybe with 18 cores?
Can you hack a wallet with a lot of bitcoins using this tool?
Yes you can!! Rent all the GPUs that you can and let the program run non-stop until you find a wallet with a lot of bitcoins in it! It's easy! Shouldn't take long either, maybe a few days to a week at the most. 
If you had a quantum computer, you could decipher anything and steal all the cryptocurrency...
lol
So it looks like that BitCrack hates any kind of cicc optimization and will immediately throw a misaligned address even on optimization level 1.
Ptxas optimization still works though, and setting it to the default level 3 triples the speed on my T4. Now before anyone gets excited about this, the speed still sucks compared to older cards (only 60MKeys/s now).
Meanwhile I have pushed the updates to https://github.com/ZenulAbidin/BitCrack-3000
Go get 'em boys.
Ptxas optimization still works though, and setting it to the default level 3 triples the speed on my T4. Now before anyone gets excited about this, the speed still sucks compared to older cards (only 60MKeys/s now).
Meanwhile I have pushed the updates to https://github.com/ZenulAbidin/BitCrack-3000
Go get 'em boys.
why this will happen when i run 2 windows in same time then close the other one then speed will boost for few seconds 
Well one of the two CUDA kernels that were running on the GPU have exited so naturally the other CUDA kernel should get all the clock cycles that were previously reserved for the other kernel.
Very satisfying and technical answer as i expect..
PS. Bear with me everyone I'm trying to push the mods on Github
why this will happen when i run 2 windows in same time then close the other one then speed will boost for few seconds
Well one of the two CUDA kernels that were running on the GPU have exited so naturally the other CUDA kernel should get all the clock cycles that were previously reserved for the other kernel.
is it better to use more than 1 target? for example if i use one target and it needs 1 year to crack and then i let it work on the 2nd one and it also needs 1 year will it found 2 targets together in maybe 2 years or faster?
then it cracks from 20 targets one of them in 20 years? (only example)
then it cracks from 20 targets one of them in 20 years? (only example)
I'm sure there's an optimal number of targets to search for simultaneously, but Bitcrack can't calculate this number yet. Too low and you're not making full use of the GPU, while too high and you're going to make each iteration slower.
and it is possible to run the script offline?
Bitcrack doesn't have a networking feature so yes.
PS. Bear with me everyone I'm trying to push the mods on Github
and it is possible to run the script offline?
What you mean offline?
BitCrack is work offline already no need internet connection
try unplug LAN cable or off WIFI it still work
Jump to: