Pages:
Author

Topic: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys - page 44. (Read 74618 times)

member
Activity: 406
Merit: 45
can anyone explain what the difference is between the various tools? please give me a few explanatory sentences so that you can understand it even if you are not so deep in it?

- BitCrack
- VanitySearch
- vanitygen
- vanitygen-plus


And what are these exact puzzle numbers?
what is it about puzzle?
https://privatekeys.pw/puzzles/bitcoin-puzzle-tx


puzzle is bitcoin address you need to crack bitcoin address by fine private key
if you got private key you can access to bitcoin and transfer bitcoin to you own as rewards

hint for puzzle is key range of bitcoin tell you know that bitcoin have private key on what range you can find it on range

puzzle 1 to 63 is solve already next will be puzzle 64 or any puzzle not yet solve

choose puzzle you want to solve and try to finish as you want
most select puzzle 64 for now because puzzle 64 is 64 bit is low range it is low bits to easy for crack if high range is very hard to crack it

this puzzle same in this forum
https://privatekeys.pw/puzzles/bitcoin-puzzle-tx
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-challenge-transaction-1000-btc-total-bounty-to-solvers-updated-5218972
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-puzzle-transaction-32-btc-prize-to-who-solves-it-1306983



full member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 219
Shooters Shoot...
i know that programs exists for newer cards (what you are showing it's vanity search right?) quite interesting i get almost same speed on all RTX's 2060 as 3070. 1200-1300 compared to 1400 @ 3070
i have looked at jeanpaul source code and it's state of art nothing to say here, but vanitysearch uses a different concept than brute force and even if i introduced a keyspace to solve btc puzzle it will still not work as intended (i will need to modify a lot more there but maybe i will have a try). I dont want to reinvent the wheel Smiley
haha...no, this is not regular Vanity Search where the MKey/s you see when using regular Vanity Search is addresses, not keys.  When Vanity Search lands on a point, it looks/calculates 6 different addresses because of endo and symm. The 3070 on regular vanity gets over 2000 MKey/s
member
Activity: 71
Merit: 43
i know that programs exists for newer cards (what you are showing it's vanity search right?) quite interesting i get almost same speed on all RTX's 2060 as 3070. 1200-1300 compared to 1400 @ 3070
i have looked at jeanpaul source code and it's state of art nothing to say here, but vanitysearch uses a different concept than brute force and even if i introduced a keyspace to solve btc puzzle it will still not work as intended (i will need to modify a lot more there but maybe i will have a try). I dont want to reinvent the wheel Smiley
full member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 219
Shooters Shoot...
just right click on them and click load solution (or something like this)
// edit
i think we need a complete rewrite of bitcrack, i will try next week to see if i can succeed maybe it will work with newer graphic cards also. (first project in c++ and cuda) Cheesy anyone who can code interested ?
Programs exist for new cards.

Code:
GPU: GPU #1 GeForce RTX 3070 (46x128 cores) Grid(368x512)
1403.307 MK/s (GPU 1403.307 MK/s) (2^33.02) [00:00:06 Elapsed Time][0]
[i] Saving progress now... 10010000000000000000000000000053D30000000
1405.036 MK/s (GPU 1405.036 MK/s) (2^34.02) [00:00:12 Elapsed Time][0]

Just not 100% because you have to use string vs full address but at least you can use the newer cards. But a 3070 using a string gets 1400 +/- MKey/s
legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 2663
Escrow Service
can anyone explain what the difference is between the various tools? please give me a few explanatory sentences so that you can understand it even if you are not so deep in it?

- BitCrack
- VanitySearch
- vanitygen
- vanitygen-plus


And what are these exact puzzle numbers?
what is it about puzzle?
https://privatekeys.pw/puzzles/bitcoin-puzzle-tx
member
Activity: 71
Merit: 43
just right click on them and click load solution (or something like this)
// edit
i think we need a complete rewrite of bitcrack, i will try next week to see if i can succeed maybe it will work with newer graphic cards also. (first project in c++ and cuda) Cheesy anyone who can code interested ?
member
Activity: 260
Merit: 19
the right steps towerds the goal
Why this happens when i open sln file of @NotATether source


2 errors 1 warning

member
Activity: 107
Merit: 61
On V100 speed is drastically slower than normal:

Tesla V100-SXM2- 10809 / 16160MB | 1 target 224.55 MKey/s (6,422,528,000 total) [00:00:26]


Does anyone know the average speed for V100 on original Bitcrack?
Average speed with optimal grid settings is 1500 Mkey/s

Unfortunately at this moment all my 3090 is busy, I have to wait few days to check your version on RTX.
member
Activity: 71
Merit: 43
@NotATether, yes what i have uploaded it's your source code compiled with random mode fixed for cuda (made a PR right now)

//edit
i think we should mention the driver version also, right now i cant see it (im on remote)  Roll Eyes
member
Activity: 260
Merit: 19
the right steps towerds the goal
On V100 speed is drastically slower than normal:

Tesla V100-SXM2- 10809 / 16160MB | 1 target 224.55 MKey/s (6,422,528,000 total) [00:00:26]


Does anyone know the average speed for V100 on original Bitcrack?

[2021-04-02.22:14:56] [Info] Error: misaligned address

Is that on my build of BitCrack (I highly doubt it though; this error is strictly an optimization problem) or someone else's?

the question with debug or release was for _counselor not you zahid.
anyway here is the compiled version with random mode fixed: https://mega.nz/file/rlNSGbqD#D-6wJc1aiNS5Sb05ZAKV1FuGaks2slwR2CGIrUCnywo
as always, dont trust binaries.

Mind sharing with me the modified files through PM so I can commit the changes to my fork?

the question with debug or release was for _counselor not you zahid.
anyway here is the compiled version with random mode fixed: https://mega.nz/file/rlNSGbqD#D-6wJc1aiNS5Sb05ZAKV1FuGaks2slwR2CGIrUCnywo
as always, dont trust binaries.

i download @Minase compiled version and he compiled yours
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
On V100 speed is drastically slower than normal:

Tesla V100-SXM2- 10809 / 16160MB | 1 target 224.55 MKey/s (6,422,528,000 total) [00:00:26]


Does anyone know the average speed for V100 on original Bitcrack?

[2021-04-02.22:14:56] [Info] Error: misaligned address

Is that on my build of BitCrack (I highly doubt it though; this error is strictly an optimization problem) or someone else's?

the question with debug or release was for _counselor not you zahid.
anyway here is the compiled version with random mode fixed: https://mega.nz/file/rlNSGbqD#D-6wJc1aiNS5Sb05ZAKV1FuGaks2slwR2CGIrUCnywo
as always, dont trust binaries.

Mind sharing with me the modified files through PM so I can commit the changes to my fork?
member
Activity: 260
Merit: 19
the right steps towerds the goal
C:\Users\G:\cuBitCrack\cuBitCrack.exe --keyspace ae93ec9126000000:ffffffffffffffff 16jY7qLJnxb7CHZyqBP8qca9d51gAjyXQN
[2021-04-02.22:14:44] [Info] Compression: compressed
[2021-04-02.22:14:44] [Info] Starting at: 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000AE93EC9126000000
[2021-04-02.22:14:44] [Info] Ending at:   000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
[2021-04-02.22:14:44] [Info] Counting by: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
[2021-04-02.22:14:44] [Info] Initializing GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
[2021-04-02.22:14:50] [Info] Generating 39,845,888 starting points (1520.0MB)
[2021-04-02.22:14:54] [Info] 10.0%
[2021-04-02.22:14:54] [Info] 20.0%
[2021-04-02.22:14:55] [Info] 30.0%
[2021-04-02.22:14:55] [Info] 40.0%
[2021-04-02.22:14:55] [Info] 50.0%
[2021-04-02.22:14:55] [Info] 60.0%
[2021-04-02.22:14:56] [Info] 70.0%
[2021-04-02.22:14:56] [Info] 80.0%
[2021-04-02.22:14:56] [Info] 90.0%
[2021-04-02.22:14:56] [Info] 100.0%
[2021-04-02.22:14:56] [Info] Done
[2021-04-02.22:14:56] [Info] Error: misaligned address

ok finely this update is not for 30 series Cry
member
Activity: 71
Merit: 43
the question with debug or release was for _counselor not you zahid.
anyway here is the compiled version with random mode fixed: https://mega.nz/file/rlNSGbqD#D-6wJc1aiNS5Sb05ZAKV1FuGaks2slwR2CGIrUCnywo
as always, dont trust binaries.
full member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 219
Shooters Shoot...
Quote
obvious i click on release not debug let me roll back my driver and try again.. if i can't please share your compiled cubitcrack with me i am very exited to know this will work in 30 series or not..
Make sure the vcxproj file has 10.2 or you will get same error. You have to change the file to the props you are trying to compile with.
full member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 219
Shooters Shoot...
Quote
Try that one

if not work try again with  click cuda_10.1.105_418.96_win10.exe  or cuda_10.1.243_win10_network.exe

I don't know my laptop not work with cuda 10.2

Did you change the vcxproj file to 10.2?  The default vcxproj has 10.1 props, if you do not change it to 10.2, you will get error (if trying to compile with 10.2)
member
Activity: 406
Merit: 45

Did you compile it for release? Or debug?

@Zahid888, you need to install cuda 10.2. Doesnt matter if you have higher version, you need that exact version in order to compile. I can share my build but i'm against precompilled sources (you never know)

obvious i click on release not debug let me roll back my driver and try again.. if i can't please share your compiled cubitcrack with me i am very exited to know this will work in 30 series or not..

download in progress...
 

Try that one

if not work try again with  click cuda_10.1.105_418.96_win10.exe  or cuda_10.1.243_win10_network.exe

I don't know my laptop not work with cuda 10.2
member
Activity: 260
Merit: 19
the right steps towerds the goal

Did you compile it for release? Or debug?

@Zahid888, you need to install cuda 10.2. Doesnt matter if you have higher version, you need that exact version in order to compile. I can share my build but i'm against precompilled sources (you never know)

obvious i click on release not debug let me roll back my driver and try again.. if i can't please share your compiled cubitcrack with me i am very exited to know this will work in 30 series or not..

download in progress...

member
Activity: 71
Merit: 43
Good to hear that speeds aren't abysmal on GeForce cards. Maybe it was because I used the default points/blocks/threads and never bothered turning them for my Tesla card.

On V100 speed is drastically slower than normal:

Tesla V100-SXM2- 10809 / 16160MB | 1 target 224.55 MKey/s (6,422,528,000 total) [00:00:26]


Did you compile it for release? Or debug?

@Zahid888, you need to install cuda 10.2. Doesnt matter if you have higher version, you need that exact version in order to compile. I can share my build but i'm against precompilled sources (you never know)
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 1
by the way if someone hacks an 1 Billion Account do you think there is no problem if you catch the bitcoins? i think that can bring a big trouble like the mafia, what you want to do with it, if you pay it out the bank know there is something wrong Grin and people with not many amount will broke my heart to take the coins.
i only use for education and to know if my wallet is secure.
full member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 219
Shooters Shoot...
I am always impressed with the rocket engineer level discussions in this thread and the puzzle one.
I know a large number of the puzzle ?wallets? have been cracked with this, correct? The prize is then able to be self claimed because with the private key, it would be the same as having the wallet.dat correct?

Correct. If you have the hex private key or the WIF (which bitcrack will give you one of them, can't remember which) then you can import into wallet and claim the BTC. If it gives you hex priv key then you can use simple script to decode to WIF or use a site like bitaddress . org and then import WIF.
Pages:
Jump to: