Topic: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys - page 73. (Read 77647 times)
So what is the benchmark speed with 3090 card?
3090 on vanitygen, clBitCrack and VanitySearch works. cuBitCrack was never able to start. gives an error message
Code:
ID: 0
Name: GeForce RTX 3090
Capability: 8.6
MP: 82
Cores: 656 (8 per MP)
Memory: 24576MB
https://i.ibb.co/MR8WV0J/55.png Name: GeForce RTX 3090
Capability: 8.6
MP: 82
Cores: 656 (8 per MP)
Memory: 24576MB
If you can, I'm interested in stats for prefix lengths between 4 and 10, legacy address format. Can you show me screenshots of those too, using all your cores (just for the heck of it) and the 3090? I'd do this myself but I don't have a recent NVIDIA GPU to test with.
Sorry friend, I pointed out that these are not my screenshots RTX3090 they came across me in the tlegram channel, someone shared, I unfortunately only RTX2080Ti, I think in the very near future there will be other details about the working settings and performance of RTX3090.
Has anyone managed to run cuBitCrack on 30XX?
I can't say about the work of RTX30XX in cuBitCrack came across screenshots as far as you can tell from them this is 6 RTX3090 cards working in vanitygen, can someone correct me. Where can I see that the RTX3090 is about 70% more productive than the RTX2080Ti. but whether you can trust these screenshots I can't say.
Interesting key rate of 19.63721 Gigakeys/second you have there with that 3090, your 40 cores only contribute ~150 Mkeys/second so they're no good for large prefix lengths. But even with your GPU it's still going to reach 50% of the space in 11 years so what's the length of the prefix you're searching for? It'll help me gauge how much computing power I'd need to put in to compute private keys of different prefix lengths in a single day.
If you can, I'm interested in stats for prefix lengths between 4 and 10, legacy address format. Can you show me screenshots of those too, using all your cores (just for the heck of it) and the 3090? I'd do this myself but I don't have a recent NVIDIA GPU to test with.
Has anyone managed to run cuBitCrack on 30XX?
I can't say about the work of RTX30XX in cuBitCrack came across screenshots as far as you can tell from them this is 6 RTX3090 cards working in vanitygen, can someone correct me. Where can I see that the RTX3090 is about 70% more productive than the RTX2080Ti. but whether you can trust these screenshots I can't say.
Has anyone managed to run cuBitCrack on 30XX?
With a RTX 30xx card? Or a different one? If different, what card are you using?
I use 1070, I was planning to buy 3080, but now I'm thinking.
I still hope that the author will show up.
[/quote]
You may have to change the CUDA version to 11.0 or some other newer version if they make it for the 300xx, change CCAP, and maybe the SDK, but I'm not sure why it wouldn't work.
With a RTX 30xx card? Or a different one? If different, what card are you using?
[/quote]
I use 1070, I was planning to buy 3080, but now I'm thinking.
I still hope that the author will show up.
After installing the new driver version (456.38), bitcrack gives an error (Error: too many resources requested for launch).
The problem is solved by rolling back to the previous version, but the question arises about the new 30XX line of nVidia.
The problem is solved by rolling back to the previous version, but the question arises about the new 30XX line of nVidia.
BitCrack last updated on early of this year, so it's possible it won't be compatible with newer nvidia gpu. Consider use another tools such as https://github.com/JeanLucPons/Kangaroo
I am considering other options, most of all curious is the tool https://github.com/JeanLucPons/BTCCollider, but you cannot specify where, what and how to search on it.
After installing the new driver version (456.38), bitcrack gives an error (Error: too many resources requested for launch).
The problem is solved by rolling back to the previous version, but the question arises about the new 30XX line of nVidia.
Did you try to adjust the -b -t -p sizes? The problem is solved by rolling back to the previous version, but the question arises about the new 30XX line of nVidia.
What speeds do you get with older driver?
At my requests 91-92 Mkey / s, after installing a new driver and reducing the -t parameter to 384, the speed dropped to 74 Mkey / s.
After installing the new driver version (456.38), bitcrack gives an error (Error: too many resources requested for launch).
The problem is solved by rolling back to the previous version, but the question arises about the new 30XX line of nVidia.
The problem is solved by rolling back to the previous version, but the question arises about the new 30XX line of nVidia.
BitCrack last updated on early of this year, so it's possible it won't be compatible with newer nvidia gpu. Consider use another tools such as https://github.com/JeanLucPons/Kangaroo
I am considering other options, most of all curious is the tool https://github.com/JeanLucPons/BTCCollider, but you cannot specify where, what and how to search on it.
After installing the new driver version (456.38), bitcrack gives an error (Error: too many resources requested for launch).
The problem is solved by rolling back to the previous version, but the question arises about the new 30XX line of nVidia.
Did you try to adjust the -b -t -p sizes? The problem is solved by rolling back to the previous version, but the question arises about the new 30XX line of nVidia.
What speeds do you get with older driver?
At my requests 91-92 Mkey / s, after installing a new driver and reducing the -t parameter to 384, the speed dropped to 74 Mkey / s.
After installing the new driver version (456.38), bitcrack gives an error (Error: too many resources requested for launch).
The problem is solved by rolling back to the previous version, but the question arises about the new 30XX line of nVidia.
Did you try to adjust the -b -t -p sizes? The problem is solved by rolling back to the previous version, but the question arises about the new 30XX line of nVidia.
What speeds do you get with older driver?
developer is missing, hope he is enjoying cracked address and now forget his community
a lot of people don't want to believe the enormous size of the private key to search and the impossibility of ever succeeding in finding anything in that vast space so they waste a lot of time for a while before they realize it. besides the "puzzle" this was supposed to solve is also starting to get real hard even though it is still at the very low key ranges so that also isn't going anywhere.
After installing the new driver version (456.38), bitcrack gives an error (Error: too many resources requested for launch).
The problem is solved by rolling back to the previous version, but the question arises about the new 30XX line of nVidia.
The problem is solved by rolling back to the previous version, but the question arises about the new 30XX line of nVidia.
when --count is coming ?
developer is missing, hope he is enjoying cracked address and now forget his community
and how gpu is checking 100m/sec keys with --stride that is confusing
lets say --stride is 2 and gpu calculations is 100/sec than GPU will work like this
so in one second = 2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24,26...............190,192,194,196,198,200
next second will be = 202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216...............390,392,394,396,398,400
right?
lets say --stride is 2 and gpu calculations is 100/sec than GPU will work like this
so in one second = 2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24,26...............190,192,194,196,198,200
next second will be = 202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216...............390,392,394,396,398,400
right?
when --count is coming ?
No it's a brainless application.
You need fast indexing of the targets and a more directional approach.
Filter off the dust and the file will be ~120 Megs.
In it's current state it's just a heater and it's not going to find anything, not now not ever.
You need fast indexing of the targets and a more directional approach.
Filter off the dust and the file will be ~120 Megs.
In it's current state it's just a heater and it's not going to find anything, not now not ever.
bro hope you have car, which one model/year you have ?
No it's a brainless application.
You need fast indexing of the targets and a more directional approach.
Filter off the dust and the file will be ~120 Megs.
In it's current state it's just a heater and it's not going to find anything, not now not ever.
You need fast indexing of the targets and a more directional approach.
Filter off the dust and the file will be ~120 Megs.
In it's current state it's just a heater and it's not going to find anything, not now not ever.
currently bitcrack running features like if stride is 100
count+stride+count+stride = 1+100+1+100 = total 202
looking update with new switch --count as define by user ( --count 200) and stride 100 ( user count is checking keys)
user-count + stride + user-count+ stride + user- count = 300+100+300+100+300 = total 1100
addons if --keyspace is 1:3000, new switch --loop --count 2000 --stride 100
user-count + stride + user-count+ stride + user- count = 2000+100+2000(its reach at end but still countin in loop from 1(startkey))+100+2000 continue loop
--count will be keys need to be check and stride
hope this feature will make bitcrack more effective and attractive
Thankx
count+stride+count+stride = 1+100+1+100 = total 202
looking update with new switch --count as define by user ( --count 200) and stride 100 ( user count is checking keys)
user-count + stride + user-count+ stride + user- count = 300+100+300+100+300 = total 1100
addons if --keyspace is 1:3000, new switch --loop --count 2000 --stride 100
user-count + stride + user-count+ stride + user- count = 2000+100+2000(its reach at end but still countin in loop from 1(startkey))+100+2000 continue loop
--count will be keys need to be check and stride
hope this feature will make bitcrack more effective and attractive
Thankx
Promising tool,
However even with 1080TI, you still need 25472017000000 years to complete a full priv key check.
So only possiblity is luck and you reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllllllyyyyyyyyyyy need to be lucky
However even with 1080TI, you still need 25472017000000 years to complete a full priv key check.
So only possiblity is luck and you reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllllllyyyyyyyyyyy need to be lucky
Jump to: