◈◈Bitcredit ◈◈ Migrating to UniQredit◈◈ - page 239.

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Statistics Engine 0.0.6 stsrting to be a lot more accurate and responsive. Likely Friday will see it deployed in all working wallets along with many other updates.

Quote from: tamara163 on January 05, 2015, 12:50:26 PM

and where to download normal wallet?windows

https://github.com/bitcreditscc/bitcreditswin

tamara163

legendary

Activity: 1027

Merit: 1000

and where to download normal wallet?windows

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: crush on January 04, 2015, 05:32:07 PM

Quote from: bitcreditscc on January 04, 2015, 04:49:25 AM

As i work out some of the algorithms and think on how best to reward those who contribute to the bank, grants and the reserve, i am more convinced that a modified PoS (selective staking) is not ideal. As a result i am going for a custom solution. Also, likely I may have BitBank become a completely separate currency that is based of Bitcredits, that is to say that there will be a fork, Bitcredits will continue as normal, but from that point a new chain is in effect that supports BitBank, this is because i want BitBank to be cross-chain capable, meaning that i will add support for some of the major currencies.

Totally confused..

Did the ICO already happen? What was the price? And only solomining for now?

ICO suspended i'm taking the time to work on the code. yes for now it's solo-mining it's pretty easy.

Considering the sudden jump in blocks produced i'm guessing a lot of hash has been thrown on.

crush

full member

Activity: 260

Merit: 100

Quote from: bitcreditscc on January 04, 2015, 04:49:25 AM

As i work out some of the algorithms and think on how best to reward those who contribute to the bank, grants and the reserve, i am more convinced that a modified PoS (selective staking) is not ideal. As a result i am going for a custom solution. Also, likely I may have BitBank become a completely separate currency that is based of Bitcredits, that is to say that there will be a fork, Bitcredits will continue as normal, but from that point a new chain is in effect that supports BitBank, this is because i want BitBank to be cross-chain capable, meaning that i will add support for some of the major currencies.

Totally confused..

Did the ICO already happen? What was the price? And only solomining for now?

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

As i work out some of the algorithms and think on how best to reward those who contribute to the bank, grants and the reserve, i am more convinced that a modified PoS (selective staking) is not ideal. As a result i am going for a custom solution. Also, likely I may have BitBank become a completely separate currency that is based of Bitcredits, that is to say that there will be a fork, Bitcredits will continue as normal, but from that point a new chain is in effect that supports BitBank, this is because i want BitBank to be cross-chain capable, meaning that i will add support for some of the major currencies.

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Progress Report

What is this?

I am running preliminary tests on a statistics engine which will be the core of BitBank, what it basically does is collect information about each users transactions, compare with the general network and present figures. These figures have a direct influence on your trust rating and credits score.

Your trust rating and credit score are central to your ability to use BitBank facilities.

For now I am focusing on expanding the rudimentary algorithms in the engine to be able to provide accurate useable information. Again, forget the whitepaper for now, i have ideas and i like to try to implement them more than i like writing about them.

Note:- the slight rebranding to drop the "s" is part of a drive to expand beyond just the main chain.

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: z21770179 on January 02, 2015, 11:48:09 AM

Maybe you can contact the new exchange：http://trade.jiuzhou168.info E-mail:[email protected]

Here you can trade with BTC, also with RMB.

Thanks

z21770179

sr. member

Activity: 474

Merit: 250

Maybe you can contact the new exchange：http://trade.jiuzhou168.info E-mail:[email protected]

Here you can trade with BTC, also with RMB.

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: antonio8 on January 02, 2015, 10:46:13 AM

Quote from: bitcreditscc on January 02, 2015, 12:48:06 AM

Quote from: antonio8 on January 02, 2015, 12:20:15 AM

@ bitcreditscc

Just found this ann and your coin but a little confused.

I read that the wallet should be version 2.1.6 but as some one posted earlier, I also downloaded from the OP and the wallet says v1.2.06.1. I also tried the link in your post #192 and the download says v0.3.1 but when running the wallet it says v0.10.99.0. When I open the one from your post #192 the wallet does look like what you have posted in #193 but the version numbers don't match up.

Like I said, I am confused on what wallet to be on and what download to use.

Hello

v0.3.1 is a release candiate, which is what it says in the wallet and my post, it is an update on which i am basing some of the major stuff i am working on.

Use the one in the OP if you are mining that link always points to the latest stable build..

Quote

the wallet is still marked as pre-release since there are features i want to add.

the 10.99 is some remnant from upstream since with every update i rebase to the latest code, then work in every change.

Ok but can you verify that the link in the OP is correct?

Like I said earlier, you said to make sure we are on version 2.1.6 but the OP download says version 1.2.06.1. Is this just an issue where the 1.2.06.1 is just a glitch and it is actually v2.1.6?

I just don't want to be wasting time on a wrong wallet.

yes the version system is very confusing. The one in the OP is correct, i'll correct the post to reflect the current number. Was hoping not to touch anything until today's nightly build is completed

antonio8

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1000

Quote from: bitcreditscc on January 02, 2015, 12:48:06 AM

Quote from: antonio8 on January 02, 2015, 12:20:15 AM

@ bitcreditscc

Just found this ann and your coin but a little confused.

I read that the wallet should be version 2.1.6 but as some one posted earlier, I also downloaded from the OP and the wallet says v1.2.06.1. I also tried the link in your post #192 and the download says v0.3.1 but when running the wallet it says v0.10.99.0. When I open the one from your post #192 the wallet does look like what you have posted in #193 but the version numbers don't match up.

Like I said, I am confused on what wallet to be on and what download to use.

Hello

v0.3.1 is a release candiate, which is what it says in the wallet and my post, it is an update on which i am basing some of the major stuff i am working on.

Use the one in the OP if you are mining that link always points to the latest stable build..

Quote

the wallet is still marked as pre-release since there are features i want to add.

the 10.99 is some remnant from upstream since with every update i rebase to the latest code, then work in every change.

Ok but can you verify that the link in the OP is correct?

Like I said earlier, you said to make sure we are on version 2.1.6 but the OP download says version 1.2.06.1. Is this just an issue where the 1.2.06.1 is just a glitch and it is actually v2.1.6?

I just don't want to be wasting time on a wrong wallet.

Fitamp

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

Quote from: bitcreditscc on January 02, 2015, 04:00:29 AM

Quote from: Fitamp on January 02, 2015, 03:47:15 AM

So I have 8 gb of ram, mining this would be "setgenerate true -1" in console correct? or is there a "setgenerate true 'Number of threads' " that i should use?

yes you are correct, setgenerate true -1 will mine with all available threads. 8 GB ram is more than enough for most processors. Since each thread will take ~750 MB

To simplify the process, the next update will have GUI option for this among other things.

Awesome thanks

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: zeustiao on January 02, 2015, 04:21:23 AM

anything news with the dev? Huh

The underlying engine is almost complete, meaning phase one of the implementation is almost complete. Keep on mining and i promise in two to five days you'll see an update release candidate with some clear advances.

zeustiao

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

anything news with the dev? Huh

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: Fitamp on January 02, 2015, 03:47:15 AM

So I have 8 gb of ram, mining this would be "setgenerate true -1" in console correct? or is there a "setgenerate true 'Number of threads' " that i should use?

yes you are correct, setgenerate true -1 will mine with all available threads. 8 GB ram is more than enough for most processors. Since each thread will take ~750 MB

To simplify the process, the next update will have GUI option for this among other things.

Fitamp

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

So I have 8 gb of ram, mining this would be "setgenerate true -1" in console correct? or is there a "setgenerate true 'Number of threads' " that i should use?

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: antonio8 on January 02, 2015, 12:20:15 AM

@ bitcreditscc

Just found this ann and your coin but a little confused.

I read that the wallet should be version 2.1.6 but as some one posted earlier, I also downloaded from the OP and the wallet says v1.2.06.1. I also tried the link in your post #192 and the download says v0.3.1 but when running the wallet it says v0.10.99.0. When I open the one from your post #192 the wallet does look like what you have posted in #193 but the version numbers don't match up.

Like I said, I am confused on what wallet to be on and what download to use.

Hello

v0.3.1 is a release candiate, which is what it says in the wallet and my post, it is an update on which i am basing some of the major stuff i am working on.

Use the one in the OP if you are mining that link always points to the latest stable build..

Quote

the wallet is still marked as pre-release since there are features i want to add.

the 10.99 is some remnant from upstream since with every update i rebase to the latest code, then work in every change.

NoobKidOnTheBlock

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 500

FLY DONATION ADDRESS IN SIGNATURE

Quote from: antonio8 on January 02, 2015, 12:20:15 AM

@ bitcreditscc

Just found this ann and your coin but a little confused.

I read that the wallet should be version 2.1.6 but as some one posted earlier, I also downloaded from the OP and the wallet says v1.2.06.1. I also tried the link in your post #192 and the download says v0.3.1 but when running the wallet it says v0.10.99.0. When I open the one from your post #192 the wallet does look like what you have posted in #193 but the version numbers don't match up.

Like I said, I am confused on what wallet to be on and what download to use.

Yes I am also having problems figuring out which is the proper wallet that we are supposed to be using right now for this coin and would like this to be cleared up so that I could continue mining this coin Wink

antonio8

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1000

@ bitcreditscc

Just found this ann and your coin but a little confused.

I read that the wallet should be version 2.1.6 but as some one posted earlier, I also downloaded from the OP and the wallet says v1.2.06.1. I also tried the link in your post #192 and the download says v0.3.1 but when running the wallet it says v0.10.99.0. When I open the one from your post #192 the wallet does look like what you have posted in #193 but the version numbers don't match up.

Like I said, I am confused on what wallet to be on and what download to use.

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

If you are having problems, it's a safer bet to ask a question than to make theories

Or do you need a translation?

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: siameze on January 01, 2015, 05:03:18 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: bitcreditscc on December 17, 2014, 12:01:39 AM

My mistake, seems my computer is inaccessible from outside the local network. I have posted a 500 x 20 Bounty for the first active 20 nodes.

Your source is as broken as can be.

Code:

root@:~/bitcredits# ./autogen.sh
./autogen.sh: 9: ./autogen.sh: autoreconf: not found

Code:

Makefile.am: required file `./NEWS' not found
Makefile.am: required file `./README' not found
Makefile.am: required file `./AUTHORS' not found
Makefile.am: required file `./ChangeLog' not found
configure.ac:11: required file `src/config/bitcredits-config.h.in' not found

Code:

root@:~/bitcredits# ./configure
./configure: line 2750: syntax error near unexpected token `disable-shared'
./configure: line 2750: `LT_INIT(disable-shared)'

Straight to the garbage bin with this one.

Agreed. This was most likely built with a coin generator. Binaries go haywire in WINE too. The fact that it is another ico coin isn't going to help either.

Yes please , do tell, which coin generator is producing Momentum based coin? For that matter based off the latest bitcoin source code? I think you should get your facts straight before posting.

If you are having problems, it's a safer bet to ask a question than to make theories

Topic: ◈◈Bitcredit ◈◈ Migrating to UniQredit◈◈ - page 239. (Read 284530 times)