Pages:
Author

Topic: ◈◈Bitcredit ◈◈ Migrating to UniQredit◈◈ - page 75. (Read 284526 times)

hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
A review of BITCREDIT has been submitted by a user.

You can read the review of 'bitcredit' HERE

Brought to you by: allcryptocoins.net

Please remove the review of Bitcredit, not only is it highly biased and inappropriate, we have not opened up to anyone for review.

The article in question is no different from assessing a car's performance before the engine has even been built.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
till now, successfully synced till 210005 and banknode started on 2 nodes:

91.230.123.101:8888
91.230.123.11:8877

Edit2: after he found a block, the mining process stop
Edit: on both nodes "getblocktemplate" tells me that my bnminingkey is invalid, but mining works ...

Code:
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01       - Connect 1 transactions: 0.01ms (0.012ms/tx, 0.000ms/txin) [0.00s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-840000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7 , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-600000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01     - Verify 0 txins: 14.20ms (0.000ms/txin) [65.05s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Running BitcreditMiner with 1 transactions in block (289 bytes)
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2015-10-02 07:22:01   nActualTimespan = 447470  before bounds
2015-10-02 07:22:01 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60    nActualTimespan = 480
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Before: 20025e53  025e530000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 After:  2001e186  01e186eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
2015-10-02 07:22:01   nActualTimespan = 447470  before bounds
2015-10-02 07:22:01 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60    nActualTimespan = 480
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Before: 20025e53  025e530000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 After:  2001e186  01e186eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01       - Connect 1 transactions: 0.01ms (0.015ms/tx, 0.000ms/txin) [0.00s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-840000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7 , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-600000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01     - Verify 0 txins: 16.55ms (0.000ms/txin) [65.07s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Running BitcreditMiner with 1 transactions in block (289 bytes)

Good, good, we are getting somewhere. Now, check your balances.dat and look for the address you are trying to use to mine. the balance is xxxxx/100000000. if that number is > 50000 then your key is valid.

1) Remember you cannot mine consecutive blocks with the same key (i'll write a method to automatically try multiple keys later)

2) If your balances.dat is corrupted (you can tell if there are negative numbers), then your key may be rejected.

5zoh1bN2XTbFrbM5yPiBEK1R2nomhPa9dY,5152535000000
6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB,5439320000000
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
please recheck the ratings/grantdb.dat to be created if not found.

case:
1. blockchain till 210008
2. ratings/grantdb.dat does not exists
3. start the wallet
4. wallet try to read the grantdb.dat.
5. not found, sigfault

hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
now i'm synced to 210005, block accepted with correct data. Just pushed fix for vote prefix, small pull and make shaould make ordinary non-BN nodes build grantDB automatically.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
till now, successfully synced till 210005 and banknode started on 2 nodes:

91.230.123.101:8888
91.230.123.11:8877

Edit2: after he found a block, the mining process stop
Edit: on both nodes "getblocktemplate" tells me that my bnminingkey is invalid, but mining works ...

Code:
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01       - Connect 1 transactions: 0.01ms (0.012ms/tx, 0.000ms/txin) [0.00s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-840000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7 , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-600000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01     - Verify 0 txins: 14.20ms (0.000ms/txin) [65.05s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Running BitcreditMiner with 1 transactions in block (289 bytes)
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2015-10-02 07:22:01   nActualTimespan = 447470  before bounds
2015-10-02 07:22:01 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60    nActualTimespan = 480
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Before: 20025e53  025e530000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 After:  2001e186  01e186eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
2015-10-02 07:22:01   nActualTimespan = 447470  before bounds
2015-10-02 07:22:01 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60    nActualTimespan = 480
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Before: 20025e53  025e530000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 After:  2001e186  01e186eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01       - Connect 1 transactions: 0.01ms (0.015ms/tx, 0.000ms/txin) [0.00s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-840000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7 , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-600000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01     - Verify 0 txins: 16.55ms (0.000ms/txin) [65.07s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Running BitcreditMiner with 1 transactions in block (289 bytes)

Good, good, we are getting somewhere. Now, check your balances.dat and look for the address you are trying to use to mine. the balance is xxxxx/100000000. if that number is > 50000 then your key is valid.

1) Remember you cannot mine consecutive blocks with the same key (i'll write a method to automatically try multiple keys later)

2) If your balances.dat is corrupted (you can tell if there are negative numbers), then your key may be rejected.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
till now, successfully synced till 210005 and banknode started on 2 nodes:

91.230.123.101:8888
91.230.123.11:8877

Edit2: after he found a block, the mining process stop
Edit: on both nodes "getblocktemplate" tells me that my bnminingkey is invalid, but mining works ...

Code:
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01       - Connect 1 transactions: 0.01ms (0.012ms/tx, 0.000ms/txin) [0.00s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-840000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7 , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-600000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01     - Verify 0 txins: 14.20ms (0.000ms/txin) [65.05s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Running BitcreditMiner with 1 transactions in block (289 bytes)
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2015-10-02 07:22:01   nActualTimespan = 447470  before bounds
2015-10-02 07:22:01 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60    nActualTimespan = 480
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Before: 20025e53  025e530000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 After:  2001e186  01e186eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
2015-10-02 07:22:01   nActualTimespan = 447470  before bounds
2015-10-02 07:22:01 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60    nActualTimespan = 480
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Before: 20025e53  025e530000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 After:  2001e186  01e186eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01       - Connect 1 transactions: 0.01ms (0.015ms/tx, 0.000ms/txin) [0.00s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-840000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7 , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout  address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-600000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01     - Verify 0 txins: 16.55ms (0.000ms/txin) [65.07s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Running BitcreditMiner with 1 transactions in block (289 bytes)
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
bnminingkey is not the address who received the 50k ??
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
seems like my banknode minigkey is invalid ... ?!?

2015-10-02 07:12:59 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2015-10-02 07:12:59   nActualTimespan = 447470  before bounds
2015-10-02 07:12:59 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2015-10-02 07:12:59 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60    nActualTimespan = 480
2015-10-02 07:12:59 Before: 20025e53  025e530000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-10-02 07:12:59 After:  2001e186  01e186eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
2015-10-02 07:12:59   nActualTimespan = 447470  before bounds
2015-10-02 07:12:59 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2015-10-02 07:12:59 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60    nActualTimespan = 480
2015-10-02 07:12:59 Before: 20025e53  025e530000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-10-02 07:12:59 After:  2001e186  01e186eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
2015-10-02 07:12:59 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:12:59 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:12:59 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:12:59 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:12:59       - Connect 1 transactions: 0.01ms (0.013ms/tx, 0.000ms/txin) [0.00s]
2015-10-02 07:12:59 ERROR: ConnectBlock(): banknode miningkey invalid
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
sr. member
Activity: 260
Merit: 250
After trying to connect to your node, deamon starts and then stops

Quote
...
2015-10-02 05:59:16 LoadBlockIndexDB: last block file = 1
2015-10-02 05:59:16 LoadBlockIndexDB: last block file info: CBlockFileInfo(blocks=76225, size=125333529, heights=133783...210005, time=2015-06-08...2015-10-01)
2015-10-02 05:59:16 Checking all blk files are present...
2015-10-02 05:59:16 LoadBlockIndexDB(): transaction index disabled
2015-10-02 05:59:16 LoadBlockIndexDB(): address index disabled
2015-10-02 05:59:16 LoadBlockIndexDB(): hashBestChain=00ce37d19bfcdb3184bafe3126fb6935ec08dd5e6c77a634cdfef05d88deb0f6 height=210005 date=2015-10-01 21:46:40 progress=0.993764
2015-10-02 05:59:16 init message: Verifying blocks...
2015-10-02 05:59:16 Verifying last 50 blocks at level 4
2015-10-02 05:59:16  === Grant Database Block Height -1 ===


sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
bitcredit-cli getblock 008f3c91e5dc40b00a991fc93d4d56ea16fe51236c93900b14466815ac8c13fb
{
    "hash" : "008f3c91e5dc40b00a991fc93d4d56ea16fe51236c93900b14466815ac8c13fb",
    "confirmations" : 1,
    "size" : 289,
    "height" : 210005,
    "version" : 2,
    "merkleroot" : "cd11870528d8d011111f3f46d0a4b41c215752fe5e049128af23aa4a2f1bce1d",
    "tx" : [
        "cd11870528d8d011111f3f46d0a4b41c215752fe5e049128af23aa4a2f1bce1d"
    ],
    "time" : 1443764842,
    "nonce" : 1,
    "BirthdayA" : 50805649,
    "BirthdayB" : 51070687,
    "bits" : "20025e53",
    "difficulty" : 0.00000003,
    "chainwork" : "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000f58883919",
    "previousblockhash" : "005286b1c29917aa464967ee2294957b5869761679c939fcdd6bf8df4fb4e802"
}


bitcredit-cli getrawtransaction "cd11870528d8d011111f3f46d0a4b41c215752fe5e049128af23aa4a2f1bce1d"
01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fffff fff0d035534030110062f503253482fffffffff04c06d6b48000000001976a9146af0e2751aecb3 d5e4813548b08cc748d663f8da88ac0095ba0a000000001976a91408226e8d382b07d2cfe02c678 937c82275b960aa88ac0095ba0a000000001976a9146d7733df664a56f942602300facd7c4119d5 2bd988ac403a690d000000001976a914dcee7e519cc25c52f52439dc9012e3d884d5ef1888ac000 00000


bitcredit-cli decoderawtransaction 01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fffff fff0d035534030110062f503253482fffffffff04c06d6b48000000001976a9146af0e2751aecb3 d5e4813548b08cc748d663f8da88ac0095ba0a000000001976a91408226e8d382b07d2cfe02c678 937c82275b960aa88ac0095ba0a000000001976a9146d7733df664a56f942602300facd7c4119d5 2bd988ac403a690d000000001976a914dcee7e519cc25c52f52439dc9012e3d884d5ef1888ac000 00000
{
    "txid" : "cd11870528d8d011111f3f46d0a4b41c215752fe5e049128af23aa4a2f1bce1d",
    "version" : 1,
    "locktime" : 0,
    "vin" : [
        {
            "coinbase" : "035534030110062f503253482f",
            "sequence" : 4294967295
        }
    ],
    "vout" : [
        {
            "value" : 12.15000000,
            "n" : 0,
            "scriptPubKey" : {
                "asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 6af0e2751aecb3d5e4813548b08cc748d663f8da OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
                "hex" : "76a9146af0e2751aecb3d5e4813548b08cc748d663f8da88ac",
                "reqSigs" : 1,
                "type" : "pubkeyhash",
                "addresses" : [
                    "5zoh1bN2XTbFrbM5yPiBEK1R2nomhPa9dY"
                ]
            }
        },
        {
            "value" : 1.80000000,
            "n" : 1,
            "scriptPubKey" : {
                "asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 08226e8d382b07d2cfe02c678937c82275b960aa OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
                "hex" : "76a91408226e8d382b07d2cfe02c678937c82275b960aa88ac",
                "reqSigs" : 1,
                "type" : "pubkeyhash",
                "addresses" : [
                    "5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7"
                ]
            }
        },
        {
            "value" : 1.80000000,
            "n" : 2,
            "scriptPubKey" : {
                "asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 6d7733df664a56f942602300facd7c4119d52bd9 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
                "hex" : "76a9146d7733df664a56f942602300facd7c4119d52bd988ac",
                "reqSigs" : 1,
                "type" : "pubkeyhash",
                "addresses" : [
                    "6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL"
                ]
            }
        },
        {
            "value" : 2.25000000,
            "n" : 3,
            "scriptPubKey" : {
                "asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 dcee7e519cc25c52f52439dc9012e3d884d5ef18 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
                "hex" : "76a914dcee7e519cc25c52f52439dc9012e3d884d5ef1888ac",
                "reqSigs" : 1,
                "type" : "pubkeyhash",
                "addresses" : [
                    "6BCRBKZLmq2JwWLWDtJZL26ao4uHhqG6mH"
                ]
            }
        }
    ]
}


getworktemplate after I found 210005 if failing with
bitcredit-cli getblocktemplate
error: {"code":-1,"message":"CreateNewBlock() : TestBlockValidity failed"}

and stoped mining
sr. member
Activity: 260
Merit: 250
Quote

{
    "chain" : "main",
    "blocks" : 210005,
    "headers" : 211752,
    "bestblockhash" : "00ce37d19bfcdb3184bafe3126fb6935ec08dd5e6c77a634cdfef05d88deb0f6",
    "difficulty" : 0.00000003,
    "verificationprogress" : 0.99435650,
    "chainwork" : "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000f58883919"
}

banknode-cli getblock 210005
error: {"code":-5,"message":"Block not found"}

banknode-cli getrawtransaction 00ce37d19bfcdb3184bafe3126fb6935ec08dd5e6c77a634cdfef05d88deb0f6
error: {"code":-5,"message":"No information available about transaction"}

banknode-cli decoderawtransaction 00ce37d19bfcdb3184bafe3126fb6935ec08dd5e6c77a634cdfef05d88deb0f6
error: {"code":-22,"message":"TX decode failed"}

banknode-cli getpeerinfo
[
    {
        "id" : 62,
        "addr" : "146.90.136.80:8877",
        "addrlocal" : "104.238.186.50:41852",
        "services" : "0000000000000001",
        "lastsend" : 1443765257,
        "lastrecv" : 1443765257,
        "bytessent" : 18246,
        "bytesrecv" : 965808,
        "conntime" : 1443742681,
        "pingtime" : 0.07829900,
        "version" : 70012,
        "subver" : "/Section32:0.30.17.3/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "startingheight" : 2930,
        "banscore" : 0,
        "servicesdesc" : "MSG RELAY ASSETS ESCROW IBTP BANK BRIDGE",
        "synced_headers" : 91381,
        "synced_blocks" : -1,
        "inflight" : [
        ],
        "whitelisted" : false
    },
    {
        "id" : 209,
        "addr" : "91.230.123.101:8877",
        "addrlocal" : "104.238.186.50:35119",
        "services" : "0000000000000001",
        "lastsend" : 1443765337,
        "lastrecv" : 1443765337,
        "bytessent" : 3096,
        "bytesrecv" : 3320,
        "conntime" : 1443760295,
        "pingtime" : 0.06890100,
        "version" : 70012,
        "subver" : "/Section32:0.30.17.3/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "startingheight" : 12143,
        "banscore" : 0,
        "servicesdesc" : "MSG RELAY ASSETS ESCROW IBTP BANK BRIDGE",
        "synced_headers" : -1,
        "synced_blocks" : -1,
        "inflight" : [
        ],
        "whitelisted" : false
    },
    {
        "id" : 249,
        "addr" : "91.230.123.11:8877",
        "addrlocal" : "104.238.186.50:52638",
        "services" : "0000000000000001",
        "lastsend" : 1443765264,
        "lastrecv" : 1443765264,
        "bytessent" : 504,
        "bytesrecv" : 766,
        "conntime" : 1443765143,
        "pingtime" : 0.10624100,
        "version" : 70012,
        "subver" : "/Section32:0.30.17.3/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "startingheight" : 8625,
        "banscore" : 0,
        "servicesdesc" : "MSG RELAY ASSETS ESCROW IBTP BANK BRIDGE",
        "synced_headers" : -1,
        "synced_blocks" : -1,
        "inflight" : [
        ],
        "whitelisted" : false
    }


It could be on my end or am I just messing commands ?
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
Code:
{
    "version" : 301703,
    "protocolversion" : 70012,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 153.90010703,
    "darksend_balance" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 210005,
    "timeoffset" : 0,
    "connections" : 2,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 0.00000003,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1442735310,
    "keypoolsize" : 3,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "relayfee" : 0.00001000,
    "errors" : "Warning: We do not appear to fully agree with our peers! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade."
}

{
    "chain" : "main",
    "blocks" : 210005,
    "headers" : 211752,
    "bestblockhash" : "00ce37d19bfcdb3184bafe3126fb6935ec08dd5e6c77a634cdfef05d88deb0f6",
    "difficulty" : 0.00000003,
    "verificationprogress" : 0.99435650,
    "chainwork" : "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000f58883919"
}



I'm still learning, what else command to use ? This transaction gets the same warning.
It's a cold wallet, with bn mining set to BN address, what I found out lastly is that when I firstly was using bn mining (before conf bnmining= was introduced) it was mining to bn empty cold wallet.

"getblock "
"getrawtransaction  "
"decoderawtransaction "

it will list the transactions you published.

Aslo do "getpeerinfo"  and post that too

try connecting to 23.94.239.139. if your block is valid, it will sync  my node
sr. member
Activity: 260
Merit: 250
Code:
{
    "version" : 301703,
    "protocolversion" : 70012,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 153.90010703,
    "darksend_balance" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 210005,
    "timeoffset" : 0,
    "connections" : 2,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 0.00000003,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1442735310,
    "keypoolsize" : 3,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "relayfee" : 0.00001000,
    "errors" : "Warning: We do not appear to fully agree with our peers! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade."
}

{
    "chain" : "main",
    "blocks" : 210005,
    "headers" : 211752,
    "bestblockhash" : "00ce37d19bfcdb3184bafe3126fb6935ec08dd5e6c77a634cdfef05d88deb0f6",
    "difficulty" : 0.00000003,
    "verificationprogress" : 0.99435650,
    "chainwork" : "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000f58883919"
}



I'm still learning, what else command to use ? This transaction gets the same warning.
It's a cold wallet, with bn mining set to BN address, what I found out lastly is that when I firstly was using bn mining (before conf bnmining= was introduced) it was mining to bn empty cold wallet.

EDIT:
hmmm, time to delete these dust wallets, maybe it's a part of disagreement ?
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
Everyone synced to 210004 should be able to start their banknodes now. Also if someone broadcasts a valid block...ie contains grants, the chain will move for everyone

I looked at the price too, price went down but buy support is the same amount.
is there a win build for the new wallet or anyone with banknodes on 17.3 windows can start too..?

Not yet, but should be available sometime in the morning. For now all the guys who were debugging are synced to 210004. What we are doing now is verifying that everything is being built ok (specifically the databases) once we are sure, we'll start the net. I want each user to be able to build all their databases without need for external sources.

While people can just as easily bootstrap, it is very important that the software work without reliance on such manual , complicated methods. I know many prefer a moving network, but we've already spent a lot of time and effort ironing out issues, let's just do it right and never have to look back at this portion of code until we are doing routine maintenance.

Sorry but I'm not so sure about it, same conditions but different output, in my case since I started segenerate (grantdb.dat created) I'm at block 210005

decode the block and post the transactions you broadcasted, also if you are not connected to the others then the block will just be on your end.
sr. member
Activity: 260
Merit: 250
Everyone synced to 210004 should be able to start their banknodes now. Also if someone broadcasts a valid block...ie contains grants, the chain will move for everyone

I looked at the price too, price went down but buy support is the same amount.
is there a win build for the new wallet or anyone with banknodes on 17.3 windows can start too..?

Not yet, but should be available sometime in the morning. For now all the guys who were debugging are synced to 210004. What we are doing now is verifying that everything is being built ok (specifically the databases) once we are sure, we'll start the net. I want each user to be able to build all their databases without need for external sources.

While people can just as easily bootstrap, it is very important that the software work without reliance on such manual , complicated methods. I know many prefer a moving network, but we've already spent a lot of time and effort ironing out issues, let's just do it right and never have to look back at this portion of code until we are doing routine maintenance.

Sorry but I'm not so sure about it, same conditions but different output, in my case since I started segenerate (grantdb.dat created) I'm at block 210005
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
Everyone synced to 210004 should be able to start their banknodes now. Also if someone broadcasts a valid block...ie contains grants, the chain will move for everyone

I looked at the price too, price went down but buy support is the same amount.
is there a win build for the new wallet or anyone with banknodes on 17.3 windows can start too..?

Not yet, but should be available sometime in the morning. For now all the guys who were debugging are synced to 210004. What we are doing now is verifying that everything is being built ok (specifically the databases) once we are sure, we'll start the net. I want each user to be able to build all their databases without need for external sources.

While people can just as easily bootstrap, it is very important that the software work without reliance on such manual , complicated methods. I know many prefer a moving network, but we've already spent a lot of time and effort ironing out issues, let's just do it right and never have to look back at this portion of code until we are doing routine maintenance.
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
Everyone synced to 210004 should be able to start their banknodes now. Also if someone broadcasts a valid block...ie contains grants, the chain will move for everyone

I looked at the price too, price went down but buy support is the same amount.
is there a win build for the new wallet or anyone with banknodes on 17.3 windows can start too..?
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
Everyone synced to 210004 should be able to start their banknodes now. Also if someone broadcasts a valid block...ie contains grants, the chain will move for everyone

I looked at the price too, price went down but buy support is the same amount.
member
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
Quote


So next block must be mined by another banknode, according to the new rules?

lg t.

If we get a new windows build out/approved I will turn my bank nodes on.
Pages:
Jump to: