ANNOUNCING RECORD PROFITS!!!
฿28.50000228 PAID
A dividend of 0.00000057 BTC/share was paid on bitfunder.
Taking price of 0.00004 BTC/share (the new offer), this translates to 1.425 % /week = 108% /year.
Seems like a good investment to me.
(those are just numbers, not projections of future profit)
Question is: are those actual profits? It's easy to dividend out some of your capital (by not deducting all costs before claiming a profit) to try to attract interest in your shares. Also remember their sales are in USD (even if transacted in BTC they set prices in USD) - so with BTC having fallen sharply the same USD sales as in rpevious perod would generate more BTC profit. Whilst that's great it has to be taken into account when looking at growth - as we can't expect BTC to lose 2/3 of its value every week.
Some weeks back they paid for advertising on reddit. If thats not counted in when working out profits then the figures are rather deceptive. And that's a problem I've seen on lots of BTC "businesses" - that they calculate profits in a very perverse manner.
What I want to see in accounts is a statement of all accounts at the start of a period and then a statement for the end - with profit being the difference between the two. Unfortunately what we often get (mining companies being the worse for this) is income less immediate operational costs being all called profit - and dividended out causing a fall in book value. That leads to the situation where new investment regularly has to be raised to continue paying out old investment - a business model that has only ever worked well for ponzis. Alternative being a fall in share price followed by collapse when capital is finally depleted (see Ziggap).
I'm hoping that isn't the case here - and these represent actual profits with no loss to the capital of the company. But I'm not optimistic that's the case given the rush to shovel out more shares without even publishing the accounts.
Incidentally, has anyone worked out what "overwhelming demand" these shares are being sold in response to? Does the company have an overwhelming demand for more capital maybe? It certainly isn't an overwhelming demand for more shares - as there's only two sizable Bids up at non-trivial prices. And both those are well below last IPO batch price. There was one decent sized panic-buy after the dividend was paid but otherwise no indication of any significant demand whatsoever.