Pages:
Author

Topic: [BitFunder] IceDrill.ASIC IPO (235 Thash Mining Operation powered by HashFast) - page 45. (Read 378671 times)

full member
Activity: 179
Merit: 100
I've asked Eric (the independent accountant who compiled the financial report) to answer any relevant questions regarding it as it is his direct work-product.

If you ask a question on-topic, it will be answered. I've asked Eric to ignore obvious trolls (common, current practice).

You will have access to him this week, so please feel free to ask away.
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
ok, id just like to ask, how many more sierra units is icedrill still waiting for? or have they had all their units now?
full member
Activity: 453
Merit: 101
RISE WITH RAYS FOR THE FUTURE
It seems odd to me that the note on the cash flow statement for payment on the Sierras says:

"As per sales contract"

Cash flow is always done from actual payments.  Why did the accountant need to refer to the contract rather than either Bitcoin transactions or dollar payment receipts?  


Because of BTC/USD has gone up from moment of IPO

In which case you show the ACTUAL BTC paid and the exchange rate at the time.

As was done with the Cointerra investment, where a Bitpay invoice was used.

Was the Hashfast contract actually paid, or is there still outstanding amounts?  As you note BTC/USD has changed a lot since the IPO.  If BTC were held, they represent a significant gain for INVESTORS, not for a back room deal where Icedrill backdates a sale to themselves.
I know, in my answer was littlebit of sarcasm and joke.
If bitcoin price would be lower at payment moment it would be bitpay invoice, but now its only "Transaction to HashFast".

About 20 000 btc transaction to hashfast, is there transaction id?

I would like to see receipt with amount of sierra units and price in bitcoin.<- Is it possible, DeadTerra?

The bitcoin transactions for the units have been posted here before they amount to 20 000 BTC which was locked at 100 USD per BTC, giving us 2 mill USD for the 235 Thash worth of equipment.
The full trail and math will be in the audit so you can look at them yourself Smiley
We also have the receipts from HF if you don't believe me.
//DeaDTerra
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 501
It seems odd to me that the note on the cash flow statement for payment on the Sierras says:

"As per sales contract"

Cash flow is always done from actual payments.  Why did the accountant need to refer to the contract rather than either Bitcoin transactions or dollar payment receipts?  


Because of BTC/USD has gone up from moment of IPO

In which case you show the ACTUAL BTC paid and the exchange rate at the time.

As was done with the Cointerra investment, where a Bitpay invoice was used.

Was the Hashfast contract actually paid, or is there still outstanding amounts?  As you note BTC/USD has changed a lot since the IPO.  If BTC were held, they represent a significant gain for INVESTORS, not for a back room deal where Icedrill backdates a sale to themselves.
legendary
Activity: 1304
Merit: 1015
full member
Activity: 453
Merit: 101
RISE WITH RAYS FOR THE FUTURE
It seems odd to me that the note on the cash flow statement for payment on the Sierras says:

"As per sales contract"

Cash flow is always done from actual payments.  Why did the accountant need to refer to the contract rather than either Bitcoin transactions or dollar payment receipts?  


Because of BTC/USD has gone up from moment of IPO
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 501
It seems odd to me that the note on the cash flow statement for payment on the Sierras says:

"As per sales contract"

Cash flow is always done from actual payments.  Why did the accountant need to refer to the contract rather than either Bitcoin transactions or dollar payment receipts?  

full member
Activity: 453
Merit: 101
RISE WITH RAYS FOR THE FUTURE
member
Activity: 105
Merit: 11
285k in DC costs?  For 8 active Sierras?  Each one is 4U, so 32U.  How much of this is lining your pockets.  What a joke.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1119
wow you guys must travel first class... 15k for travel and accommodation...
full member
Activity: 179
Merit: 100
Back in Montreal.

Minestate monitor going to be down for a while, we're incorporating some of the latest cgminer (4.0.0+) changes, mainly based off HF fw 0.4 (dynamic core shedding et al changes).

(https://github.com/ckolivas/cgminer/commits/master)

Apologies for the status reporting downtime, the mine is up while it's happening...
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Hodl!
Damn, is there a Doctor in the house, Doctor Emmet Brown? Doctor Who? Doctor Rodney McKay maybe? ... Hell, I'll take Doctor Oz if his ageing reversal protocol involves some kind of time machine hardware.... No doctors?  Lieutenant Barclay?
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.
Whut? 235Th divided by 1.2TH nominal = 196 machines, 20,000 BTC / 196 = 102 BTC each, WTF did we pay retail?Huh


The extra super top secret nda deal... Unbelievable.
Exact price is 10204$/ One sierra unit.
One sierra unit was priced 9500$.
So, NDA deal mean that IceDrill is also overpayed 704$ per unit?
http://thegenesisblock.com/cointerra-and-hashfast-sell-17m-of-bitcoin-miners-open-second-batch-sales/


They were supposed to be October Units.

It would have been at the October Baby Jet Price of $5,600 or $14/GH For Retail
IceDrill would have been paying $8.62/GH

Also understand these units were supposed to arrive prior to First Batch from my understanding so yes they were getting them far below "retail" if delivery was on time.
full member
Activity: 453
Merit: 101
RISE WITH RAYS FOR THE FUTURE
Whut? 235Th divided by 1.2TH nominal = 196 machines, 20,000 BTC / 196 = 102 BTC each, WTF did we pay retail?Huh


The extra super top secret nda deal... Unbelievable.
Exact price is 10204$/ One sierra unit.
One sierra unit was priced 9500$.
So, NDA deal mean that IceDrill is also overpayed 704$ per unit?
http://thegenesisblock.com/cointerra-and-hashfast-sell-17m-of-bitcoin-miners-open-second-batch-sales/
sr. member
Activity: 299
Merit: 250
Whut? 235Th divided by 1.2TH nominal = 196 machines, 20,000 BTC / 196 = 102 BTC each, WTF did we pay retail?Huh


The extra super top secret nda deal... Unbelievable.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Hodl!
Whut? 235Th divided by 1.2TH nominal = 196 machines, 20,000 BTC / 196 = 102 BTC each, WTF did we pay retail?Huh
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
yeah that's nearly impossible to make back now... tell us how you plan on making profit for yourself.
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1020
Be A Digital Miner
Ouch.   20,000 BTC were given to HF for 235TH/s?   If all were hashing perfectly that is 235 / 22,350 (network size) X 3600 BTC per day (since hashing at pools) = 38 BTC per day.
If the network never grows and the data center hosting was free, that 20,000 BTC will be returned in 526 days.
What is in this for you, DT and Will, since you don't get money until the 20,000 is paid back right?   Why are you still doing this?
Pages:
Jump to: