Topic: [BitFunder] IceDrill.ASIC IPO (235 Thash Mining Operation powered by HashFast) - page 8. (Read 378671 times)

Thats exactly what i did say in the PM and here on the forum.

im not concerned about coinbase or anything else,
simple fact is 0 balance is a 0 balance no matter how you look at it
I am simply asking for 29750 to provide an alternative for those with absolute 0 btc in their possession.

im not trying to give him a hard time,
but in time he has spent writing that last reply,
i could of sent him a signed message from the shares btc address and it could of verified already.

Thank you for pointing these things out.

Here is a current update on the claim process.

Accounts which have been successfully claimed:

Accounts which have recognizable claim transactions but are missing a finalizing output transaction to show the existing capacity to spend funds. If your address is listed here, please withdraw funds to a BTC address of your choice before 12/1.

If you do not have even 2x0.00013117 that you could potentially send yourself then please just say so that way 29750f0e1c2fbb3bb can handle your case with a "backup authentication methods" or "legacy methods". You will just have to wait for those.

I could be wrong but it appears you are trying to give a hard time to the one person actually trying to provide updates and get this unfortunate "investment" wrapped up.

Once you do the Proof simply move the 2x0.00013117 back to your wallet.

If you are somehow worried about connecting your addresses then use a third party wallet like coinbase to send funds to and withdraw them to your IceDrill address, better than a mixer!


You potentially have a year to claim this so no rush....

You can publish what ever you want, as long as you have the decency to remove anything that could be used to make claim on my shares

You still haven't provided an solution to the question, for people with a 0 Balance.
If this (2x0.00013117) is such a minor thing, how about you send it to the address in the PM and ill send it right back.
it will solve both problems

Should I publish your PM to illustrate everyone on how not to write a message? As I said I can not do 1:1 customer service, and I will not waste time on emotionally charged messages and/or obvious trolling attempts.

Proof by transaction doesn't require you to "put" more money into it, since you as the owner of the address have full control over the funds. It's your BTC address, you should have the private key. If that's not the case you need to either wait for backup authentication methods to be employed in the next few months or if that also fails, need to wait for legacy methods to be available. Also note that the smallest transaction amount I advertised (2x0.00013117) currently has a market value of about 10 UScent. That's less than it would take to write a letter or make a phone call to a bankruptcy attorney.

+1

can we get an answer to this


since apparently sending you a pm means being ignored for 2 weeks

Still it's impossible to send anything when wallet balance ==0.
What about my 0.1 BTC withdrawal request from 2nd Oct? Without that I can't do anything.
Or maybe there will be someone nice to loan me 0.1 BTC. I will give back in ~1hour.

I'll post a listing with confirmed claimed addresses soon. Also the transactions don't need to be included in the same block. I relaxed the description of how to show "proof by transaction" quite a bit. Within same timeframe means sufficiently close in the block chain to infer correlation between these two transactions. If a bus hits me tomorrow or an external entity needs to review the claims process, they should be able to deduce it from inspecting the transactions on the address either programmatically or manually.

Thank you very much, this explains it. I had no idea blockchain.info had an "advanced mode".

Bugger, might have to redo, pushed out two separate tx, but they ended up in different blocks.

That list of confirmed addresses would be handy.....

Going to take a crack at answering this.

Enable Advanced Mode - https://blockchain.info/tx/b6f8e59b0b21bcb58619c15f19bd7b29c09d0750eaaf43bb4da498ed70cf1447?show_adv=true

You'll see 3 outputs.

1V2PqZ1r1q3kR3wsXon8KSpRzKTLr2Q4j - (Unspent) 0.13117745 BTC
1V2PqZ1r1q3kR3wsXon8KSpRzKTLr2Q4j - (Unspent) 0.13117745 BTC
1V2PqZ1r1q3kR3wsXon8KSpRzKTLr2Q4j - (Unspent) 0.0369451 BTC

The last output I believe is change.


I also believe "in the same timeframe" is a single block confirmation but honestly could be wrong here.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/deadterra-40976

That last post date...the community needs to stop blindly investing in things just because a trusted name is behind it. Because that failed magnificently, didn't it?

I might be a retard, since noone has asked this question yet, but how is this an example transaction? All I see on your linked transaction is a single amount of 0.2993 BTC transferred from an address to itself. At first I thought that maybe blockchain.info consolidates identical outputs, but even then — 0.2993 is not even a multiple of 0.13117745. I don't see TWO outputs, I don't see the specified amount — for me it seems to be just a random transaction.

Could anyone explain to me what I am missing here?

Also, you said you will also accept two transactions of the specified amount "in the same timeframe". What is this timeframe? A minute? Same block? A century?

Thank you in advance and I'm glad this thing finally seems to be moving forward.

...like, using his victims to help him launder money? smart.

Your instructions seem to require additional expense. How is that in the best interest of the shareholders? Please provide instructions that don't incur expenses/fees.

Further, what is the point of correlating two transactions to an address of record you already have? Again, this makes little sense to me.


It is lovely that you are in a position to collect information about the ID business practices. Of course, we're not getting paid either.

ok. I think I managed to do what was asked.

Can we see a list of 'verified' addresses at some point so we can make sure our processes worked?

And what about those withdrawal issue on Cryptomex? I understand that Cryptomex is not your domain but you may kick some ass, so they will push that withdrawals thats hang over a month!

Well if we end up owning Simon Barber, can he come cut my lawn once a month or something?

To all which don't receive a reply to a PM I apologize. I simply don't have enough time to perform 1 on 1 customer service. I tried to provide clear instructions for everyone to follow so they can get cleared for receiving payouts and keep them somewhat informed. I am currently consolidating the financials and collecting information about the business practices at ID and compile it in a way for everyone to inspect. Also let me make clear that I am not getting paid for this. I am doing this to provide shareholders with the transparency they need to make an informed assessment of ID after the fact.

There is a lot of data which you don't see and which is hard to communicate given the degree of failure of this fund. Simply put 75% of the fund was destroyed by the actions of HashFast, 10% was wasted on expensive upkeep and a few percent were redirected into refocusing efforts of the business. You may blame current management for failing to serve in the best interest of their shareholders but that doesn't affect the 75% failure.

You'll get numbers and fancy graphics as soon as all transactions are sufficiently annotated. Also sorry for my point-blank tone of conversation - but I don't see any value in sugar coating anything here. Also keep in mind that ID is still involved in recovery actions against HashFast. As long as that process is ongoing it is hard to draw final conclusions.

I just figured out who 29750f0e1c2fbb3bb is,

Its Eddie from scamfast, you can tell same level of customer support,
Getting answers via PM is like drawing blood from a stone.

Kudos for doubling down on the scam good sir