Traces? Do you believe they've found, to quote Prendergast (sic) "Kenilworth Exploration has already a single hit of 107/gt Au-Gold in our one diamond drill."
In gold mining standards that's almost pure gold!
(btw does anyone else find his kindy-level grammar, not just in the quote above but throughout all his writing, oddly incongruent with his wide range of academic qualifications?)
"According to the World Gold Council (WGC), larger and better quality underground mines contain around 8 to 10g/t, with marginal underground mines have averages of around 4 to 6g/t. Open pit mines usually have lower grades from 1g/t to 4g/t, but can be highly valuable despite the lower average grade."
source
http://goldinvestingnews.com/world-class-gold-depositsC'mon guys do some basic research! At least google g/t gold. Or maybe what comes first, drilling or survey?
You bring up valid points.
I had not actually noticed the 107 g/t.
But this could just be a mistake
Maybe it should read 1.07 g/t.
To further staff this idea I checked the other documents for spelling mistakes.
You'll find both Prendergast and Prendegast used for the same person.
We'll also find the 107 g/t mention there.
Which really stands out as the odd number.
Because the other findings seem more realistic.
So should 107 g/t be a mistake and really be 1.07 g/t.
It seems strange that they wouldn't mention the 2.2 g/t they've found.
A company can't afford to make mistakes (or mislead) like this.
107 g/t has been mentioned by Prendergast several times now.
Enough chances to correct this mistake.
So I would assume he knows little of gold extraction.
We could also still be talking to someone posing as Prendergast.
Maybe Prendergast (Leo?) could make a video talking about Kenilworth AND Bitcoin.
Because I no longer have any inclination to purchase shares.