bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy - page 78.

bitcoindaddy

hero member

Activity: 481

Merit: 500

Quote from: Clipse on August 05, 2011, 12:04:24 PM

When using pools that use mine_slush and altslicescheduler, shouldnt it remove the slice part on the pool if it starts to mine there and the pool allready went above the predefined 10.35% ?

What I notice is that it gives slush for instance a slice of 300sec(or whatever it sliced at) then it would eventually hop to slush even if its at >10.35% (my example it was at 40%) and then finish the 300sec slice. I think it should be able to notice the pool is assigned mine_slush (or atleast its defined something other than just mine) and clear the slice as soon as it hops there(or before it hops there)

See my posted issue regarding this topic:

https://github.com/c00w/bitHopper/issues/128

Clipse

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 502

When using pools that use mine_slush and altslicescheduler, shouldnt it remove the slice part on the pool if it starts to mine there and the pool allready went above the predefined 10.35% ?

What I notice is that it gives slush for instance a slice of 300sec(or whatever it sliced at) then it would eventually hop to slush even if its at >10.35% (my example it was at 40%) and then finish the 300sec slice. I think it should be able to notice the pool is assigned mine_slush (or atleast its defined something other than just mine) and clear the slice as soon as it hops there(or before it hops there)

gnaget

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 102

Quote from: Starlightbreaker on August 05, 2011, 11:56:32 AM

Hm.
bithopper refuses to hop from digbtc, even after i disabled digbtc.

He fixed that issue last night, did you get latest?

Starlightbreaker

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1006

Hm.
bithopper refuses to hop from digbtc, even after i disabled digbtc.

bitcoindaddy

hero member

Activity: 481

Merit: 500

Quote from: paraipan on August 05, 2011, 11:17:46 AM

Quote from: joulesbeef on August 05, 2011, 11:12:32 AM

Quote

the "selective" lag problems with bitclockers could appear from more factors than just low QOS account or IP ban, could be geographic location too

pool.bitclockers.com 8332 Denver
pool2.bitclockers.com 8332 Chicago
pool3.bitclockers.com 8332 Czech Republic

I shouldnt have any problems with the first two, especially the second.. but i do

man you force me do this

... from where you're mining ? give the coast at least or something... like plains of the purple buffalo

edit: and the third ?

Isn't the problem with the API and not the pool address?

paraipan

legendary

Activity: 924

Merit: 1004

Firstbits: 1pirata

Quote from: joulesbeef on August 05, 2011, 11:12:32 AM

Quote

the "selective" lag problems with bitclockers could appear from more factors than just low QOS account or IP ban, could be geographic location too

pool.bitclockers.com 8332 Denver
pool2.bitclockers.com 8332 Chicago
pool3.bitclockers.com 8332 Czech Republic

I shouldnt have any problems with the first two, especially the second.. but i do

man you force me do this

... from where you're mining ? give the coast at least or something... like plains of the purple buffalo

edit: and the third ?

Clipse

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 502

Quote from: joulesbeef on August 05, 2011, 11:12:32 AM

Quote

the "selective" lag problems with bitclockers could appear from more factors than just low QOS account or IP ban, could be geographic location too

pool.bitclockers.com 8332 Denver
pool2.bitclockers.com 8332 Chicago
pool3.bitclockers.com 8332 Czech Republic

I shouldnt have any problems with the first two, especially the second.. but i do

Ive been testing flowers poclbm mod out since last night and waiting for new bitclockers block to start, will let you know if this solve the issue for me (as it apparently did for flowers)

joulesbeef

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

moOo

Quote

the "selective" lag problems with bitclockers could appear from more factors than just low QOS account or IP ban, could be geographic location too

pool.bitclockers.com 8332 Denver
pool2.bitclockers.com 8332 Chicago
pool3.bitclockers.com 8332 Czech Republic

I shouldnt have any problems with the first two, especially the second.. but i do

Clipse

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 502

Quote from: EskimoBob on August 05, 2011, 11:07:04 AM

Hi, before I do my next git pull, I like to see what has changed. I did read the git --help but for some reason, I fail to find out any specific changes (especially in pools.cfg and user.cfg.default). I use c00w master branch.

Thank you

Read up on latest commits on the github page, much easier to read there than using the commit info from the client.

EskimoBob

legendary

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank

Hi, before I do my next git pull, I like to see what has changed. I did read the git --help but for some reason, I fail to find out any specific changes (especially in pools.cfg and user.cfg.default). I use c00w master branch.

Thank you

gnaget

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 102

Quote from: bitcoindaddy on August 05, 2011, 10:03:59 AM

Quote from: gnaget on August 05, 2011, 09:57:06 AM

Can someone post the info for digbit? I can't even find their URL

[digbtc]
name: DigBTC.net
mine_address: digbtc.net:8332
api_address:http://digbtc.net/
api_method:re
api_key:Round Shares: ([ 0-9]+)
url: http://www.digbtc.net/main.php

Thank you sir

paraipan

legendary

Activity: 924

Merit: 1004

Firstbits: 1pirata

Quote from: user7516 on August 05, 2011, 09:56:01 AM

Just updated to v0.1-11-g689817b and get this error:

Code:

[17:43:03] received lp from: digbtc
Unhandled Error
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Python27\Lib\c00w-bitHopper\bitHopper.py", line 298, in 
    main()
  File "C:\Python27\Lib\c00w-bitHopper\bitHopper.py", line 294, in main
    reactor.run()
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 1162, in run
    self.mainLoop()
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 1171, in mainLoop
    self.runUntilCurrent()
---  ---
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 793, in runUntilCurrent
    call.func(*call.args, **call.kw)
exceptions.TypeError: pull_lp() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)
[17:43:05] RPC request [56528000] submitted to DigBTC.net

I have to re-install twisted?
This error I had never received before. I use AOCLBF 1.77 with phatk 2.0 and bitHopper with --scheduler AltSliceScheduler.
And what about bitclockers? I change my ip, register new accaunt, but still have a lag issue with it.

give it a try without "--scheduler AltSliceScheduler"
edit: the "selective" lag problems with bitclockers could appear from more factors than just low QOS account or IP ban, could be geographic location too

joulesbeef

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

moOo

Quote

Estimated Reward this Round: -0.47 BTC (has started @ -0.50 BTC)
does this "-" mean minus and why?

there coder sucks... mine with caution, no one has gotten paid from there yet.

Quote

I understand that people don't want to get trapped on a small GH/s pool for days at a time- if that's the case, remove the pool.

you can always use a different hopper. or an older version

With slicing we found the block for the 2gighash pool digbit, and i got 1/3 a coin for about 20 minutes of work at 300mhz
No one would have mined there without slicing... too small..do you need me to do the math?

it lowers the variance and more pools is better,

I do agree eventually we need slicing to take ghashes into account

paraipan

legendary

Activity: 924

Merit: 1004

Firstbits: 1pirata

Quote from: gnaget on August 05, 2011, 09:57:06 AM

Can someone post the info for digbit? I can't even find their URL

don't have it either, I just thought he was referring to DigBTC.net one of the last pools added

edit: name fix update on git

bitcoindaddy

hero member

Activity: 481

Merit: 500

Quote from: gnaget on August 05, 2011, 09:57:06 AM

Can someone post the info for digbit? I can't even find their URL

[digbtc]
name: DigBTC.net
mine_address: digbtc.net:8332
api_address:http://digbtc.net/
api_method:re
api_key:Round Shares: ([ 0-9]+)
url: http://www.digbtc.net/main.php

Clipse

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 502

Quote from: djex on August 05, 2011, 09:44:42 AM

How can I make bitHopper mine longer on a certain pool with slicing? Right now there all evenly sliced but I want to mine longer on faster pools so I get more shares in.

Right now it doesnt know the poolspeed afaik, we need dynamicpenalty adjustment that takes poolspeed/duration into consideration for this kind of adjustment with slicedscheduler.

gnaget

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 102

Can someone post the info for digbit? I can't even find their URL

user7516

newbie

Activity: 41

Merit: 0

Just updated to v0.1-11-g689817b and get this error:

Code:

[17:43:03] received lp from: digbtc
Unhandled Error
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Python27\Lib\c00w-bitHopper\bitHopper.py", line 298, in 
    main()
  File "C:\Python27\Lib\c00w-bitHopper\bitHopper.py", line 294, in main
    reactor.run()
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 1162, in run
    self.mainLoop()
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 1171, in mainLoop
    self.runUntilCurrent()
---  ---
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 793, in runUntilCurrent
    call.func(*call.args, **call.kw)
exceptions.TypeError: pull_lp() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)
[17:43:05] RPC request [56528000] submitted to DigBTC.net

I have to re-install twisted?
This error I had never received before. I use AOCLBF 1.77 with phatk 2.0 and bitHopper with --scheduler AltSliceScheduler.
And what about bitclockers? I change my ip, register new accaunt, but still have a lag issue with it.

ewibit

legendary

Activity: 2955

Merit: 1049

Quote from: djex on August 05, 2011, 09:44:42 AM

How can I make bitHopper mine longer on a certain pool with slicing? Right now there all evenly sliced but I want to mine longer on faster pools so I get more shares in.

perhaps it makes sense to make a priority list (e.g. 1 - 5) for priorities of pools?!

Clipse

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 502

Quote from: paraipan on August 05, 2011, 09:24:19 AM

Quote from: Clipse on August 05, 2011, 09:17:11 AM

Ive noticed something strange, my pools report constantly higher accepted shares than webui of bithopper ?

example: bithashers atm reporting 800 submitted/accepted shares in bithopper webui but the website reports 1250 accepted shares.

you almost surely deleted bH database... bithashers it's the total shares submitted from signup or round ones ?

Nope didnt delete my stats.db, however I just realised the flowers poclbm mod doesnt report submitted shares to the webui, doh Wink

Topic: bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy - page 78. (Read 355678 times)