Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitmark - page 54. (Read 622228 times)

sr. member
Activity: 380
Merit: 275
November 15, 2015, 08:56:34 PM
Still Alive?
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
November 01, 2015, 05:28:01 AM
In case anyone else needs active peers / nodes:

http://www.blocktree.io/peers/BTM/

addnode=146.0.32.101
addnode=139.162.128.92
addnode=70.168.53.153
addnode=174.36.9.130
addnode=144.76.239.66
addnode=46.254.14.245
addnode=173.192.30.99
addnode=2a01:7e01::f03c:91ff:fe67:dba
addnode=72.220.127.239
addnode=5.101.96.124
addnode=2002:c063:6cf::c063:6cf
addnode=98.115.147.74
addnode=204.68.122.11
addnode=85.24.169.215
addnode=131.203.125.3
addnode=93.158.203.147
addnode=69.254.243.205
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 1001
November 01, 2015, 04:48:51 AM
Yep....that is an improvement. Just fired up my Bitmark wallet, and it flew in comparison to a month ago.
I liked Bitmark from the beginning, very sad to see how things turned out.
Hows coinsolidation ? He still involved with BTM ?
full member
Activity: 486
Merit: 104
November 01, 2015, 04:28:35 AM
Someone has been hitting the bitmark network with a fairly strong hashrate.

Coinwarz reported it yesterday as 6.45 GH/s,  I calculated it for blocks issued on 10/31/2015 as of 22:14 UTC, (143 blocks) as 6.56 GH/s, and today, 11/1/2015 between blocks 49860 and 49880, at a very healthy 21.27 GH/s, which actually resulted in the chain running fast, (about 16% faster  than the nominal 120 second block time), until about 5AM UTC.  

Between block 49880 and the last one 49881 (which just was validated or "mined" at 9AM UTC), there was a long interblock time of 3hours 45minutes; which would point to some multipool or large private farm leaving the nework (Averaging just the last 5 blocks indicates 152 MH/s on the chain. )  So yes, bitmark is still suffering from the mutlipool / crazy hash rate swings issue, but ....
        
We're working on choosing and implementing a KGW - DGW style algo to fix this (chain either too slow or too fast) and also to regulate the subsidy block reward. My timeframe is to have it done and tested by the end of the year and and announce a mandatory hard fork for some time soon after the new year.

Please chime in if you have ideas and/or concerns regarding either the difficulty regulating algo or the block reward (subsidy) algo, or anything else about bitmark.

Once the coin mechanics are taken care of, we will focus on the more exciting part of this coin's future, marking.

It seem to me there's quite a bit of life and interest in the coin yet.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
October 27, 2015, 03:46:18 AM
Apparently there is still some interest. Mining spiked before the diff change, might be someone that wants the upper hand when the diff changed or something.
legendary
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
October 26, 2015, 07:12:33 AM
This coin is so dead.
full member
Activity: 159
Merit: 100
October 06, 2015, 03:35:46 AM
Where is the BTM hash rate coming from? I mine on Scryptpool but can't find another pool which has 670 mb?
Thanks

not sure where the other pool is, used to mine btm through hash2coins but they no longer have the port for it.
the op hasn't been changed for months so cant trust the links there.
can ask in slack.
 
full member
Activity: 230
Merit: 100
October 05, 2015, 04:16:36 PM
Where is the BTM hash rate coming from? I mine on Scryptpool but can't find another pool which has 670 mb?
Thanks
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
October 03, 2015, 02:35:37 AM
is anything happening here, maybe in slack?

can i get an invite to btm slack, assuming it's still active?
full member
Activity: 162
Merit: 100
September 25, 2015, 09:33:52 PM
how is the legal action against Nathan Rixham progressing?
legendary
Activity: 1241
Merit: 1005
..like bright metal on a sullen ground.
September 25, 2015, 07:32:24 PM
Will be delisted from bittrex on November 1st  Cry
full member
Activity: 486
Merit: 104
September 11, 2015, 04:04:25 PM
Here's a couple that should be running 24/7:
204.68.122.11
70.168.53.153

Here's also a listing of current peers (Fri Sep 11 21:04:07 UTC 2015) on a particular node:

        "addr" : "144.76.64.123",
        "addr" : "46.254.14.245",
        "addr" : "174.36.9.130",
        "addr" : "70.168.53.148",
        "addr" : "192.99.47.133",
        "addr" : "204.68.122.11",
        "addr" : "85.24.169.215",
        "addr" : "131.203.125.3",
        "addr" : "198.205.118.181",
        "addr" : "144.76.64.123",
        "addr" : "146.0.32.101",
        "addr" : "69.254.243.205",
        "addr" : "178.32.251.114",
        "addr" : "173.192.30.99",
        "addr" : "72.220.127.239",
        "addr" : "70.168.53.148",
        "addr" : "178.32.251.114",
        "addr" : "198.205.118.181",
        "addr" : "5.101.96.124",
        "addr" : "98.115.147.74",
        "addr" : "70.168.53.148",
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
September 11, 2015, 02:44:04 AM
I'll ask in slack about the node issue.

The original dev is no longer involved but there is currently active development going on from dbkeys and the developer he's hired to implement his ideas.

I see... well then i hope somebody will answer before 7 days on slack
legendary
Activity: 826
Merit: 1002
amarha
September 10, 2015, 02:08:03 PM
I'll ask in slack about the node issue.

The original dev is no longer involved but there is currently active development going on from dbkeys and the developer he's hired to implement his ideas.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
September 10, 2015, 01:43:31 PM
I guess that with high difficult and very low hashrate blocks are generated very low, Last block was generated yesterday (47003) , Add Block Maturity: 720 Blocks,It take a day to confirm a transaction as someone noted earlier. Its could be of the more slow that I've seen.I'm not surprised about why  it is reaching the bottom. So wich the next thing is?  Is dev active on here?

Isn't the first one asking for so much work to be mature

Somebody has some nodes that works? I tried running the wallet for at least 1 hour but no nodes that are inside the qt wallet worked

As you can see i posted a request for nodes that didn't got answered, so i suppose there isn't a community behind this coin and even the dev isn't active or is ignoring this thread
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
September 10, 2015, 11:25:14 AM
I guess that with high difficult and very low hashrate blocks are generated very low, Last block was generated yesterday (47003) , Add Block Maturity: 720 Blocks,It take a day to confirm a transaction as someone noted earlier. Its could be of the more slow that I've seen.I'm not surprised about why  it is reaching the bottom. So wich the next thing is?  Is dev active on here?
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
September 04, 2015, 09:14:23 AM
Somebody has some nodes that works? I tried running the wallet for at least 1 hour but no nodes that are inside the qt wallet worked
legendary
Activity: 826
Merit: 1002
amarha
August 16, 2015, 08:14:42 AM
I assume the buying/volume is from people reading the chat in slack related to the new dev nearing completion on dbkeys' new algo.

Since people are wondering about why there's suddenly so much more buy support and volume, that's my best guess.
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1119
It's all mathematics...!
August 16, 2015, 04:59:34 AM
Don't forget the cheap BTM on cryptsy...maybe a buy wall on cryptsy for the scraps!
Cheers!
member
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
August 16, 2015, 02:23:43 AM
6 confrim needed ? 1 confirmation for 1 day ? Huh

yep, BTM tx's are painful now, but I just discovered a new client is on the way that should fix that ... things are looking up for BTM!!

looks like we are coming back!

Pages:
Jump to: