Pages:
Author

Topic: BitPonzi.Net - Offline - page 2. (Read 34755 times)

ama
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
October 14, 2011, 08:09:59 AM
Wow!! If I'd known that would get such quick results I'd have done it earlier and with all my rounds Cheesy.

50 deposits and Jackpot: 4.485.  You can say it's being a success, yes.  Will it go over the 72 deposits of InfiniteBitponzi3 round?  Will any of them reach 100 deposits?
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
October 13, 2011, 10:40:26 PM
Maybe I'm just taunting him now, but if your doing to attack a site, at least do it successfully. BitPonzi never went down for more than a minute or so, it was just really slow the whole time.

But really, whats the point? Stop acting like a little kid, if your have a complaint about the site, post it.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
October 13, 2011, 06:03:57 PM
Yep... the site is still somewhat functional, I'm trying to log into remote admin and its incredibly slow. I think they've switched from attacking bitcoind to a plain overload the server with requests attack. Going to see if I can block all IPs except my own and cloudflare's since all requests should go through them anyway.

I'm just glad this isn't the same botnet thats attacking the mining pools.. I'd have no chance against that.
ama
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
October 13, 2011, 05:56:21 PM
Undecided  Knew it was too good to last... attack?

It seems so.  I hope he gets tired soon.  It's getting old.
member
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
October 13, 2011, 05:52:35 PM
 Undecided  Knew it was too good to last... attack?
member
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
October 13, 2011, 04:48:37 PM
lol, well in that case the Crap_2 round is mine too. Although that's more of an experiment. First one was successful, but as the name suggested, a bit crap! This one is intended to be slightly less crap, but we'll see.

Don't know... it looks too crapy!    Grin    You said you were a bit... mmmhhh... let say 'happy' when you created the first one, didn't you?   LOL

lol, i was... but then it made a half decent profit, and (i think) paid everyone out. Maybe bar one, not sure. Anyway, it's designed to be v low risk obviously, but despite the low jackpot %, the fairly high minimum bet means a half decent jackpot should still arise, and I plan to (try to) keep it alive until then. We'll see anyway. Just can't believe my dwarf exploded!
ama
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
October 13, 2011, 04:44:30 PM
lol, well in that case the Crap_2 round is mine too. Although that's more of an experiment. First one was successful, but as the name suggested, a bit crap! This one is intended to be slightly less crap, but we'll see.

Don't know... it looks too crapy!    Grin    You said you were a bit... mmmhhh... let say 'happy' when you created the first one, didn't you?   LOL
member
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
October 13, 2011, 04:42:09 PM
wow.. this is mad. Wish the confirmations would come quicker, i can't reinvest!!  Shocked
member
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
October 13, 2011, 04:37:30 PM
Wow!! If I'd known that would get such quick results I'd have done it earlier and with all my rounds Cheesy.

Well, it seems that as soon as we know it's yours we all want to play.   Grin

lol, well in that case the Crap_2 round is mine too. Although that's more of an experiment. First one was successful, but as the name suggested, a bit crap! This one is intended to be slightly less crap, but we'll see.
ama
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
October 13, 2011, 04:32:54 PM
Wow!! If I'd known that would get such quick results I'd have done it earlier and with all my rounds Cheesy.

Well, it seems that as soon as we know it's yours we all want to play.   Grin
member
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
October 13, 2011, 04:30:02 PM
Wow!! If I'd known that would get such quick results I'd have done it earlier and with all my rounds Cheesy.
member
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
October 13, 2011, 04:17:13 PM
Shocked Who dares to tarnish the good name of the Forever Game by attaching a fee. lol. Just so everyone knows, I haven't created that round, so don't expect any booby prizes from it as with the others.

Is somebody "copying" all the names of your rounds or are those last ones really yours?

Only one that's been copied is the forever game, no idea who created the other stupid rounds. I don't think I've ever seen another deposit made to a round from 1758d. Ah... if you mean has the dwarf bank been copied, then the Super-Dwarf Bank is mine. Seemed like the site was too quiet to make a small version so thought I may as well go for it with a bigger one. I'll reinvest a few times if it takes off and make sure the jackpot is nice, then see what happens. So come on people... get depositing, things are sooo boring lately.
ama
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
October 13, 2011, 03:54:52 PM
Shocked Who dares to tarnish the good name of the Forever Game by attaching a fee. lol. Just so everyone knows, I haven't created that round, so don't expect any booby prizes from it as with the others.

Is somebody "copying" all the names of your rounds or are those last ones really yours?
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
October 13, 2011, 11:28:00 AM
Correction: Server under attack again... I'm getting really sick of this shit
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
bitcoin hundred-aire
October 12, 2011, 11:05:06 PM
Server down!

This is why you don't ponzi at bitponzi  Roll Eyes
ama
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
October 12, 2011, 11:03:20 PM
Server down!
ama
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
October 12, 2011, 04:24:52 PM
Shocked Who dares to tarnish the good name of the Forever Game by attaching a fee. lol. Just so everyone knows, I haven't created that round, so don't expect any booby prizes from it as with the others.

Man I was about to post asking you about the weird 17/5/13 right now when I saw your post.  I couldn't believe you did that!   Grin
member
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
October 12, 2011, 04:14:46 PM
 Shocked Who dares to tarnish the good name of the Forever Game by attaching a fee. lol. Just so everyone knows, I haven't created that round, so don't expect any booby prizes from it as with the others.
member
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
October 12, 2011, 01:18:38 PM

I still don't get the point of that kind of games.
It's more of a race to get the jackpot. The early entries pay into the jackpot and if there is enough people participating they get their entry refunded. The late entries make it so the early entries are less likely to have a net loss, while taking a chance and trying to be the last bidder.

It doesn't have much incentive unless the jackpot is high enough, which is why there's a bounty address.

It's not really a ponzi scheme but more of a lottery race.

It's something to experiment with and stuff. The way it works would let me make the game, and then make a deposit into the bounty, which I can only hope there's enough participants that I get refunded at least that and my initial deposit. The %s are setup so that 50% of each submission goes into the pot, allowing rapid bid endings to secure earlier bids, while the prize people want is the jackpot.

I don't plan on trying to get the jackpot myself, so with the 2% extra fee on it, I would need 35-40 participants to break even if I include a bonus 0.1btc through bounty.


Although this style of game might be better suited to a non-poniz based system where people just submit btc for tickets. and there are no returns but 98% of the btc goes towards the jackpot.
ama
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
October 12, 2011, 11:55:07 AM

I still don't get the point of that kind of games.

Is there a system of refunding bitcoin of submitters who submit too much/little, or too late? (More importantly too late)

Too late was treated here before, and it's consider a "donation" to the site.  If you deposit too late might be because you try to snip, and you should pay your risk, or because there is something wrong with the server, in which case mb300sd is understandable and reasonable enough to pay you back (been there myself a few days ago, when the server had so much down time).

Too litle/much is different, it's obviously a mistake.  Small mistake in the first case; big mistake in the second case.  The first one can pass as a little donation to the site, the second one... well, better don't make it.  I've made the first of them a couple of times, already (sent 0.05 instead of 0.5 or 0.01 instead of 0.1, no big deal).     Smiley
Pages:
Jump to: