Topic: BitShares PTS (formerly ProtoShares) Mandatory Upgrade & Snapshot Announcement - page 67. (Read 218419 times)
November 05, 2013, 09:54:46 AM
I have been mining all day and got nothing... running 2 instances with 8 hpm each
November 05, 2013, 09:54:18 AM
I can't import a private key to QT, it always gives error. Looks like it is still checking the Bitcoin Privkey format.
November 05, 2013, 09:51:21 AM
Where can I see more details on the mining procedure? Shares accepted etc? What are the commands?
Thank you in advance!
All solo mining right now. Thank you in advance!
How many blocks has everyone got? I just landed my 5th.
November 05, 2013, 09:44:56 AM
Where can I see more details on the mining procedure? Shares accepted etc? What are the commands?
Thank you in advance!
Thank you in advance!
November 05, 2013, 09:44:49 AM
FreeTrade, please don't make any changes in client, because the present client has a botnet-resistant and IT Administrator resistant (this resistant is light but useful for other people)
Nothing is IT admin resistant, resistance is futile.
Good to see a new algo .
I love this subforum.
November 05, 2013, 09:36:22 AM
FreeTrade, please don't make any changes in client, because the present client has a botnet-resistant and IT Administrator resistant (this resistant is light but useful for other people)
November 05, 2013, 09:32:40 AM
I have started the mining and my hashing is 2.02 but the generate value is still false.Am i still Mining ??
November 05, 2013, 09:00:59 AM
No luck in mining so far. Would any nice folks out there who have mined something like to make the first non-code base transaction? I'll send you a picture of some pizza, or my dvd collection.
Please donate here:
PZNUWR6L18Vd3jSaABbFnFm2hEnkzyh6Mv
Please donate here:
PZNUWR6L18Vd3jSaABbFnFm2hEnkzyh6Mv
Only 400 blocks have been mined. Most miners on here (including me) have 0 balance.
I will be happy if I manage to get a block overnight.
November 05, 2013, 08:55:20 AM
No luck in mining so far. Would any nice folks out there who have mined something like to make the first non-code base transaction? I'll send you a picture of some pizza, or my dvd collection.
Please donate here:
PZNUWR6L18Vd3jSaABbFnFm2hEnkzyh6Mv
Please donate here:
PZNUWR6L18Vd3jSaABbFnFm2hEnkzyh6Mv
November 05, 2013, 08:36:34 AM
I am offering an up-to 55 PTS bounty to the person who compiles me a Windows x64 version with MAX_NONCE as 1<<22 instead of 1<<26. I will run it concurrently with the traditional version (3 threads each).
Bounty: 15 for first block, 20 for second, 12.5 for third, 7.5 for fourth mined with the new version.
(Also, if someone would compile me one with 1<<18, that would be great too, since it would fit into my 3MB cache. Same bounty conditions.)
Alternatively, someone compile something like mikealh's primecoin which allow one to set miner parameters.
Bounty: 15 for first block, 20 for second, 12.5 for third, 7.5 for fourth mined with the new version.
(Also, if someone would compile me one with 1<<18, that would be great too, since it would fit into my 3MB cache. Same bounty conditions.)
Alternatively, someone compile something like mikealh's primecoin which allow one to set miner parameters.
November 05, 2013, 08:33:55 AM
"category" : "orphan" 
November 05, 2013, 08:30:14 AM
Intel i7 930 @ 2.80GHz
{
"blocks" : 360,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00000095,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : 4,
"hashespermin" : 5.80769558,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
{
"blocks" : 360,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00000095,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : 4,
"hashespermin" : 5.80769558,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
November 05, 2013, 08:12:21 AM
But look here, we need possible maximal hashing power in one instance miner for effective catching blocks. I think it is better to mine with two instances configured as 3 and 1 processes than 2 and 2 (for 4-core cpu).
just use 64bit linux =D an you can run any number of threads unless they fill all your ram. and even more if you have memory deduplication
November 05, 2013, 07:43:47 AM
But look here, we need possible maximal hashing power in one instance miner for effective catching blocks. I think it is better to mine with two instances configured as 3 and 1 processes than 2 and 2 (for 4-core cpu).
November 05, 2013, 07:28:11 AM
I'm just curious, I keep seeing this in the log file. Is the miner going round and round itself?
testHash ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Hash Target 000fff0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Its appearing fairly often.
testHash ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Hash Target 000fff0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Its appearing fairly often.
This means a nonce has been tested and turned up no collisions. Sometimes a nonce will turn up more than 1 collisions and the best one will be used, sometimes there are none, and we have to assign a value to that outcome which is fffffff....
November 05, 2013, 07:26:15 AM
PS will you accept fixes to build system for linux?
Thanks, best to address those to ByteMaster at Invictus.
November 05, 2013, 07:24:07 AM
{
"blocks" : 246,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00000095,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : 1,
"hashespermin" : 1.09617466,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
Is there anything wrong with this? I mean,it says ""generate" : false,".
I'm mining on windows x86 with dual core cpu.
"blocks" : 246,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00000095,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : 1,
"hashespermin" : 1.09617466,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
Is there anything wrong with this? I mean,it says ""generate" : false,".
I'm mining on windows x86 with dual core cpu.
This is some insignificant bug. To make sure that the miner works you can check cpu load for PTS wallet process in Task Manager.
November 05, 2013, 07:18:02 AM
{
"blocks" : 246,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00000095,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : 1,
"hashespermin" : 1.09617466,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
Is there anything wrong with this? I mean,it says ""generate" : false,".
I'm mining on windows x86 with dual core cpu.
"blocks" : 246,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00000095,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : 1,
"hashespermin" : 1.09617466,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
Is there anything wrong with this? I mean,it says ""generate" : false,".
I'm mining on windows x86 with dual core cpu.
I have this worry with my FX 8350, set an alarm to get up and start this on its release and still waiting for a block lol....
November 05, 2013, 07:16:19 AM
Using 64bit linux kernel and 64bit userland you can adress up to 256TiB in single process.
For me client runs fine on 24 core linux machine with 64G ram.
For me client runs fine on 24 core linux machine with 64G ram.
This. And also, what OS are you running ?
I run gentoo linux
November 05, 2013, 07:14:17 AM
{
"blocks" : 246,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00000095,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : 1,
"hashespermin" : 1.09617466,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
Is there anything wrong with this? I mean,it says ""generate" : false,".
I'm mining on windows x86 with dual core cpu.
"blocks" : 246,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00000095,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : 1,
"hashespermin" : 1.09617466,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
Is there anything wrong with this? I mean,it says ""generate" : false,".
I'm mining on windows x86 with dual core cpu.
Jump to: