Topic: [BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer (Read 31809 times)
I was wondering what happened to blockscan Counterparty block explorer ? Will it ever come back online
[BlockScan] Counterparty (XCP) Block Explorer has been discontinued by the developer as of April 11, 2017
https://www.blockscan.com/
https://www.blockscan.com/
enhanced asset info is not displaying correctly
http://blockscan.com/assetInfo/SILKROADPEPE for example
http://blockscan.com/assetInfo/SILKROADPEPE for example
Blockscan - really useful. I use it a lot. Thanks for hosting this great service 
Something that would be interesting to see on the frontpage, next to XCP supply, # of assets, price, etc, would be number of addresses with Counterparty assets. I know you have this in a graph. Would just be nice to see the number every time I check Blockscan. The GINI can be replaced IMO.
Something that would be interesting to see on the frontpage, next to XCP supply, # of assets, price, etc, would be number of addresses with Counterparty assets. I know you have this in a graph. Would just be nice to see the number every time I check Blockscan. The GINI can be replaced IMO.
Are there possible make option to search all transactions between two address?
If you are referring to just 2 specific addresses, then no. At least not out of the box. Having said that though you could use the APIs and generate a list of transactions for each address, and then programmatically just extract those matching your search criteria.
Cheers
Are there possible make option to search all transactions between two address?
What happened to xdp and xch on blockscan ?
For dogeparty you can use https://dogepartychain.io/ as a substitute. XCH support was discontinued a few months back due to a low visitor rate (from a Blockexplorer viewpoint)
All the available (from Blockscan) API calls are as listed on the site
On your homepage in the API section it reads:
"The following are examples of the available API calls:"
So are these API calls listed there only a subset of available calls. Where is the documentation of the complete set of available calls?
Greets
"The following are examples of the available API calls:"
So are these API calls listed there only a subset of available calls. Where is the documentation of the complete set of available calls?
Greets
Hi
I've just released a tool to allow you to check/retrieve/generate your counterwallet bitcoin addresses/keys using your counterwallet 12 word passphrase. The script runs client side only (in your browser using javascript). No keys, passphrases are transmitted server side. For additional security the script can also be run while in offline/disconnected mode
The tool can be accessed at https://blockscan.com/tool_generatekey. Because it is built purely with javascript and html, all of the code is viewable online.
Feedback welcomed
I've just released a tool to allow you to check/retrieve/generate your counterwallet bitcoin addresses/keys using your counterwallet 12 word passphrase. The script runs client side only (in your browser using javascript). No keys, passphrases are transmitted server side. For additional security the script can also be run while in offline/disconnected mode
The tool can be accessed at https://blockscan.com/tool_generatekey. Because it is built purely with javascript and html, all of the code is viewable online.
Feedback welcomed
Updated to allow offline message signing from any of your counterwallet addresses
The GINI index - very interesting. I hope you will introduce more metrics as well. Makes it fun to compare assets.
For GINI I wonder if an adjusted calculation would add some value. For example, some assets have one owner/distribution address which holds almost all tokens. Look at FLDC. It has GINI > 99%. It's because the owner holds token that are yet not distributed.
Another thing is addresses with dust amounts. GINI is meant for a population (a finite amount of people). Bitcoin is made of an infinite amount of addresses and over time there will be lots of addresses with dust, which makes GINI look too high.
Suggested adjustment: 1) Do not include the one address with the largest holding. 2) Sort addresses and include only those that accumulated own 95% of all assets.
For GINI I wonder if an adjusted calculation would add some value. For example, some assets have one owner/distribution address which holds almost all tokens. Look at FLDC. It has GINI > 99%. It's because the owner holds token that are yet not distributed.
Another thing is addresses with dust amounts. GINI is meant for a population (a finite amount of people). Bitcoin is made of an infinite amount of addresses and over time there will be lots of addresses with dust, which makes GINI look too high.
Suggested adjustment: 1) Do not include the one address with the largest holding. 2) Sort addresses and include only those that accumulated own 95% of all assets.
I agree. I will probably produce a filter for choosing a minimum threshold of number of addresses.
The GINI index - very interesting. I hope you will introduce more metrics as well. Makes it fun to compare assets.
For GINI I wonder if an adjusted calculation would add some value. For example, some assets have one owner/distribution address which holds almost all tokens. Look at FLDC. It has GINI > 99%. It's because the owner holds token that are yet not distributed.
Another thing is addresses with dust amounts. GINI is meant for a population (a finite amount of people). Bitcoin is made of an infinite amount of addresses and over time there will be lots of addresses with dust, which makes GINI look too high.
Suggested adjustment: 1) Do not include the one address with the largest holding. 2) Sort addresses and include only those that accumulated own 95% of all assets.
For GINI I wonder if an adjusted calculation would add some value. For example, some assets have one owner/distribution address which holds almost all tokens. Look at FLDC. It has GINI > 99%. It's because the owner holds token that are yet not distributed.
Another thing is addresses with dust amounts. GINI is meant for a population (a finite amount of people). Bitcoin is made of an infinite amount of addresses and over time there will be lots of addresses with dust, which makes GINI look too high.
Suggested adjustment: 1) Do not include the one address with the largest holding. 2) Sort addresses and include only those that accumulated own 95% of all assets.
Updated the AssetInfo sections to include the Gini Coefficient..
To whoever, who provided this suggestion last year, thanks!
Just a short update...
The Blockchain Voting (Powered by Counterparty) vote Scoreboard service is now online at https://www.blockscan.com/votes
Cheers
A feature request: Provide a way to search description text. I'd like to be able to provide a link that shows any and all assets that have a certain hash in their description ordered by block number. The reason is that I've put out a set of artworks that each come with a Counterparty token and the way the artwork is connected with the token is by putting a hash of an image of the artwork in the description field of the token when it's first issued.
An advanced asset search is now available at http://blockscan.com/search?mod=asset
Works great. I'm going to have to write a general asset + proof of existence type article based on this.
Great! Let me know when your article is complete and I will put a link in the "what's new" section of Blockscan's main page to your article.
A feature request: Provide a way to search description text. I'd like to be able to provide a link that shows any and all assets that have a certain hash in their description ordered by block number. The reason is that I've put out a set of artworks that each come with a Counterparty token and the way the artwork is connected with the token is by putting a hash of an image of the artwork in the description field of the token when it's first issued.
An advanced asset search is now available at http://blockscan/search?mod=asset
Works great. I'm going to have to write a general asset + proof of existence type article based on this.
A feature request: Provide a way to search description text. I'd like to be able to provide a link that shows any and all assets that have a certain hash in their description ordered by block number. The reason is that I've put out a set of artworks that each come with a Counterparty token and the way the artwork is connected with the token is by putting a hash of an image of the artwork in the description field of the token when it's first issued.
An advanced asset search is now available at http://blockscan.com/search?mod=asset
A feature request: Provide a way to search description text. I'd like to be able to provide a link that shows any and all assets that have a certain hash in their description ordered by block number. The reason is that I've put out a set of artworks that each come with a Counterparty token and the way the artwork is connected with the token is by putting a hash of an image of the artwork in the description field of the token when it's first issued.
Very cool. That simplifies things for me and reduces the number of Bitcoin transactions by one for the process as well!
In general, I think each type of transaction should display everything a user might want to know about it. For an issuance, seeing everyting a user might set for a new asset in Counterwallet would be cool. Obviously, seeing all of that info can be daunting for new users so there is something be said for keeping it simple (or making an advanced view link).
In general, I think each type of transaction should display everything a user might want to know about it. For an issuance, seeing everyting a user might set for a new asset in Counterwallet would be cool. Obviously, seeing all of that info can be daunting for new users so there is something be said for keeping it simple (or making an advanced view link).
Inspired by our convo at the XCP forums, I think it would be good for your asset issuances detail page to show the description and any other data pertinent to an issuance. For example, I can't see the description given when FLDC was issued in this transaction: http://blockscan.com/txInfo/429963
I've updated the issuance page to show the description with the initial asset issuance and also the associated address responsible for additional issuance. If there is any other "pertinent" data that is left out let me know. Given that the issuance page is basically a high level overview, certain information such as fees, etc have been left out
http://blockscan.com/assetInfo/FLDC#issuance
Jump to: