can we for once ignore coindesks interpretation of the news which thy sourced from panampost.
can we ignore panamposts interpretation of the news..
and can someone translate the actual banks source info.. so that we can see the actual wording the bank has used.
coindesk has exaggerated far too often with russia, china, etc before. so can we read source material before spreading rumours
http://www.scribd.com/doc/230438003/Resolucion-del-Banco-Central-de-Boliviausing google translate.. what i take from it is that bolivian central bank BCB are telling financial institutions that in article 124 they can move money digitally through mobile apps as long as they meet tight security restrictions and ensure data stays private. and that these institutions can only deal with FIAT..
it then says that BCB has
currency has been detected in some countries the use of virtual currencies like Bitcoin, Namecoin,
Tonal Bitcoin, IxCoin, Devcoin, Freicoin, 10coin, Liquidcoin, Peercoin, Quark, Primecoin,
Feathercoin and others that do not belong to ningian state, country or economic area,
emission and therefore use is not regulated and may cause a loss to their holders
which to me is the standard "investment risk" warning EVERY country has published, and that the BCB RECOMMENDS the ban of financial instittions USING bitcoin.
again like all countries banks have contracts to supply only FIAT. banks tdo not store or hand out cars, tins of beans.. only FIAT.
though im still reading it and will edit this line later. i do not see anywhere that stops INDIVIDUALS from purchasing bitcoins privately. and i do not see PRIVATE businesses cannot handle bitcoins.