Topic: BOMBSHELL: ABC News Killed Epstein-Clinton Story, Says Anchor In Hot Mic Video - page 2. (Read 769 times)

No, both things you said are not the same. Answer the question.

both things i said say the same thing. underage girls at trumps parties and being introduced to epstein and trump knowing it

Did this happen or didn't it? You seem to have revised your claim.


I would take the time to explain the massive gaps in your logic, but everyone else already sees and you don't care, so lets just skip it.

Thank you. Sworn in, right?    

^^^ And you have proof of this how?!     

a. mar a lago was trumps house
meaniing he set the guest list.

b. the video of the lawyer said that trump had info that helped the case against epstein

c. the video with the lawyer was talking about virginia roberts who was raped at 17 meaning that to be introduced to epstein shw had to be younger than 17.. (thats how time flows.. intro, then assault)
its logic.. atleast review the evidence and dont review how deep you can stick head in the sand

You also quoted yourself as my quote. Don't do that, I don't want your words ever confused for mine.

See that's interesting speaking of quotes...


They said no such thing in the video, I was just making sure there wasn't some like ultrasonic frequency speech hidden in the clip or something. This is a great example of the kind of bullshit you call evidence along with your Photoshop job. Your interpretations and assumptions are not evidence, that is called fantasy.

oh and yes i quoted your quotes of you quoting my quotes where i quoted the sources. that way you cant keep playing ignorant because you quoted me giving you the information. thus obviously you cannot pretend to have never seen the sources before
P.S trump banned epstein in 2008. yt was quoting him in 2002 as someone that liked young girls.
trump was partying with epstein and had under 18's attending the party. (virginia roberts)

1. Great, just tell me the minute and second mark and quote. Also, tell me how is it you came to be aware what happened in Trumps mind, and how exactly you expect to prove this?

2. Once again, with those psychic abilities being able to know what is in the minds of others you should be working for Mrs. Cleo making the big bucks instead of wasting your time here. Most people would call a claim to know what a person knew and intended at a certain point in time in the past without substantiation a flimsy premise, but you have those special ESP powers, so that doesn't apply here.

That's not funny. What is funny is the pule of shit on your chest.


Its almost like I already addressed this and Trump banned him from Mar-a-Lago once he found out...

You keep imagineering Trump crimes while the real evidence against Epstein and the Clinton's stacks up to the sky. Maybe some one will buy your pathetic attempts to distract from it.
[/quote]

1. the video YOU linked both says that trump invited underage girls to his parties to meet epstein. and how trump knew of epsteins proclivities YEARS before it went to court. and how trump only "banned him from mar-a-lago AFTER IT STARTED TO CAUSE LEGAL ISSUES

2. trump knew about it in the 90's and millenia but didnt distance himself untill AFTER the lawyers started calling trump.
thats not finding out about epstein coz the lawyers said trump provided good info that helped the case
also was the quotes from trump praising epstein for his proclivities
what he then did was just try to distancing himself from being tied to any legal issues AFTER THE FACT. once it started getting dicey with lawyers phone calls

do you not even bother to listen to the video. or just found a website that said it was a trump defence and you blindly accepted a websites summary and linked the video without checking it out

That's not funny. What is funny is the pile of shit on your chest.


Its almost like I already addressed this and Trump banned him from Mar-a-Lago once he found out...

You keep imagineering Trump crimes while the real evidence against Epstein and the Clinton's stacks up to the sky. Maybe some one will buy your pathetic attempts to distract from it.

even funnier is techshares own link


at 6:50 it shows that one of epsteins victims who was not even 18 was at mar a lago
who owned mar a lago
trump

its funny how tecshare tried to use a link to defend trump. but the link actually reveals trumps involvement

i see you both still ignoring the video footage from ncb in 1992
it really must be silent in your world of head in the sand living

He's got Photoshop.

^^^ Talk, talk, talk. Can't even show a pic, or even a link.

you said 'Trump had a minor business relationship with Epstein that fell through, had very little social contact with him,'
i debunked the minor business relationship as theres proof everywhere it was more then a decade of friendship
i debunked the lack of social contact again via the proof of their interactions lasting over a decade

its not an assumption. theres photos and videos that show there was more than
'minor business relationship, very little social contact'

sorry but the videos and photos and quotes and eye witnesses prove more than your lack of evidence of the opposite

anyway back to my original point. this topic is void on content.. as the 'story' has been in the public domain for decades. the only thing this topic is about is how someone got fired to releasing a video.. but the content of the video is not a 'bombshell'

You aren't linking him to anything. All of your assertions require assumptions, interpretations, and other conclusions generally unsupported by evidence. You winge on about blind loyalty to distract people from your own evident blind hatred. The difference between you and me is I am asking for evidence, you are manufacturing it via interpretation. The relationship between Bill Clinton and Epstein is not equivalent to the relationship between Trump and Epstein, and the assertion that it is is disingenuous and based in your need to have Trump shit on your chest because it is the only way you know to make the pain go away.

i think its time you stopped taking drugs now.
firstly your defending trump like he is your pop idol.. then in the same breath trying to hide your loyalty by saying anyone that links him to bad stuff is his fan

sorry but your 'cover up' to hide your obsession makes no sense to a sober person.

the only reason why he is mentioned is because clinton is old old news and not a relevant person today. but trump is in the white house right now meaning his actions are relevant as they can affect people.

but your denial of trumps grotesque quotes about his own daughter and other women and even how he has been seen for 15 years having social parties with epstein and cheer leaders and such. just shows how ignorant you are to see the evidence and prfer to be blind to it to defend trump

you said little social intraction and

sorry but blind loyalty is not contagious people wont become trump fans and follow your lead

and people can see your loyalty even if you try to hide it
its just a shame that you dont see it because it looks like you will end up just defending him as if your life depends on it.
you said 'Trump had a minor business relationship with Epstein that fell through, had very little social contact with him,'
i debunked the minor business relationship as theres proof everywhere it was more then a decade of refriendship
i debunked the lack of social contact again via the proof of their interactions lasting over a decade

the only thing i could possibly think you meant was a game of word play
'trump had a minor business relationship'
'trump had a 'underage child' business relationship. meaning he was manager of a child sex trafficking ring alongside epstein..
is that the hint you are trying to suggest?

Trump wipes his ass with toilet paper. You know who else wiped their ass with toilet paper?

HITLER

Proof Trump was involved with Hitler.



You know who knew something about Hitler?

TRUMP

Proof Trump knew about the concentration camps in WW2 and was complicit.

You should seek treatment for Trump Derangement Syndrome, letting people shit on your chest is not hygienic.