Topic: BOMBSHELL: ABC News Killed Epstein-Clinton Story, Says Anchor In Hot Mic Video - page 3. (Read 772 times)

gotta laugh at your trump supporter loyalty, but trying to say those calling him out are the trump fetishes
funnier part is how the interview video you linked actually counters your narrative
1. lawyer contacted trump due to having connections - proof trump involved
2. lawyer is happy to drop legal proceedings for a price 'settled for undisclosed amount' - lawyer happy to be bribed to keep quiet
3. trump gave evidence which helped go against epstein - proof trump knew something
4. trump wasnt deposed(financial handshakes) and distanced himself(personally) from epstein only after lawyers got involved.. not as soon as learning about epsteins proclivities a decade earlier

if you make one more post defending trump. then you might as well just war a trump loyalist shirt

also that video proves epstein stuff was going on more than just 2-3 years ago. thus making this topic about a bombshell redundant
again its all been public info for decades

There is a brown stain on your chest. You might want to take care of that.

i have no fetish for trump. im calling him out because he the current president and he is currently a world power player, not some 'one time famous' guy 20 years ago.. who doesnt matter anymore

but you seem to be defending trump and trying to make him out as a good guy that just happen to have a few bad friends, and saying trump has no clue to the social proclivities of his friends. and pretending trump has a healthy respect for female sexuality, by pretending trump never said gross stuff about his own daughter

makes me believe you are the one with the trump fetish.

also to note the video of him partying with epstein was a broadcast from an american tv news show NBC. so this topic about pretending news about epstein is 'new' 2015+ is solely and illogically untrue

epstein had known parties with young girls, he was even convicted in 2008 for crimes against kids
he also was the cause of UK royal prince andrew and Fergi's divorce due you andrews sexual acts that epstein was part of

so its all been public info since the 90's+

im just guessing her but i should just ask you straight:
are you angry at me for pointing things out about trump.
are you angry that you thought it was limited to just clinton
are you angry that what you thought was new, wasnt new
are you angry that fox news didnt report it first as they seem like certain populations favourite news outlet
are you angry that you didnt find the news broadcasts of 1992,2008 quotes from 2002. and its now hard for you to realise you been following the wrong path

Your fetish for Trump is frankly kind of repulsive. You are the kind of person who would probably get off having him shit on your chest or something.

I have known my postman for 15 years. I am sure he is a great guy too. That doesn't make us close friends or mean we hang out all the time. Don't speak for me. I said they had "very little social contact" not the gibberish you are regurgitating from your fantasies. You might also call that quote about young girls Trump calling him out and warning people, but that doesn't serve your pedo daughter fucking slander narrative does it? Of course not.

If they were such great pals why did he bar Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago resort after he was exposed? Why was he so willing to hand over information to investigators looking into him?

"Edwards: The only thing that I can say about President Trump is that he is the only person who, in 2009 when I served a lot of subpoenas on a lot of people, or at least gave notice to some pretty connected people, that I want to talk to them, is the only person who picked up the phone and said, let’s just talk.  I’ll give you as much time as you want.  I’ll tell you what you need to know, and was very helpful, in the information that he gave, and gave no indication whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward whatsoever, but had good information. That checked out and that helped us and we didn’t have to take a deposition of him in 2009."

https://youtu.be/Yqb59n69Z80

Clinton on the other hand has been on "The Lolita Express" at least 26 times according to records, but same diff right?

the one you said was without epstein is was actually a 2 part picture of the same party ORGANISED BY EPSTEIN which trump was there. like i said look at the clothes and room decor..
here
https://youtu.be/tm6T4_Tm_ho

the other pic was more of a hint to trumps inappropriateness with his daughter. not the overlay of epstein
can you not remember the stuff trump said about his own daughter
just a few examples
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EPEkk6qWkg

still wanna deny that trump had little social connection to epstein? even after the (first) video link i just shown shows otherwise.
ok more pics of them together


and also quotes in 2002 from trump
http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/

15 year friendship and talking about how he knows epstein likes the younger girls and videos of them socialising together
.. if you want to pretend it was just strictly business and nothing social and how trump didnt know anything about epsteins prefrences. then you might be as ditsy as the cheerleaders trump and epstein danced with

Cool story bro. One of those pictures doesn't even have Epstein in it, and another one is a known (horrible) photoshop, but don't let that stop you from confirming your bias.

notice the different hair of trump. which shows how long a time period it involved


note the wall, the door frame and the clothes trumps wearing above.. then below

seems like just a business meeting?

Saying both Clinton and Trump were involved with Epstein is a false equivalence. Clinton has been documented as visiting Epstein island at least a dozen times. Trump has never been there. Trump had a minor business relationship with Epstein that fell through, had very little social contact with him, and has even been documented as providing evidence to prosecutors when Epstein was investigated in the past when no one else was cooperating. The Clinton trail of dirt is wide and deep. Dirt on Trump is virtually non-existent, because if it did exist the establishment would already be leveraging the shit out of it instead of having to make shit up like they currently are.

to answer your question
EVERYONE knew

yes BOTH clinton AND trump were involved with epstein, as was many other high profile guys
if you remember the 'pizzagate' stuff involving the clintons was about clintons involvement with paedo's. but then got turned into making people think it was just a 4chan troll

but those smart enough to avoid the narrative of fox news and instead do real research can find that things have been public for DECADES

Gotcha. Thought you might've seen some connection between Neil Bush, and I wouldn't have been surprised if there were some other random rich people involved as well.

Also -- I don't think you could say this is under the watch of Jeb Bush as Alexander Acosta was a federal attorney (picked by the president, and confiemd by the Senate) I mean he may have some ties to the Bush family or something along those lines, but I can't find that info.

Also yes: The whole reason the anchor is mad isn't that she missed the opportunity to bury a horrible person for doing horrible things. She's mad because she lost a story and this was a big one.

Sorry, I did get Neil Bush mixed up with Jeb Bush, corrected


Jeb doesn't have direct ties with Epstein either AFAIK, simply that the light-touch prosecution deal was brokered under his watch (Jeb Bush was Florida's governor at the time)

---

This whole story seems like MORE bullshit tbh, the newsroom anchors are just autocue readers that don't really care about the content they're delivering. Let it never be forgotten that newsanchor Katie Couric was one of many celebrities attending Epstein's overt "Welcome Home from your child prostitution prison sentence, Jeff!" mansion party in New York. Presumably Couric's excuse is that she was there "reporting undercover", or that she "didn't know"
 
And so it seems like the reaction we're supposed to have to this "leak" is: 'Oh this anchorwoman is a total hero! She's SO against this corruption at the ABC newsroom, I'll totally trust everything that comes out her mouth from now on!!'. She could've quit and gone public, yet she chose to keep her job and keep quiet

How stupid do ABC think it's (non) viewers are?

Another breaking news! 

No surprise really.
https://truepundit.com/video-epstein-medical-examiner-drops-autopsy-bombshell-no-dna-test-conducted-to-confirm-epsteins-identity/
What beach he be strolling around?

It definitely didn't make major headlines, but it also definitely made the news, and, to be fair, there are some pretty big things going on.  I think that if the media thought the Epstein/Robach story would attract the most eyes, it would've gotten the most attention...well, maybe not from ABC.

I'm assuming you mean Jeb Bush? I think Neil Bush is the businessman of the family, with no real ties to Epstein (that I can find from first glance at least)

Don't forget Neil Jeb Bush. Bush was a 2016 presidential candidate, and Florida governor at the time of the 2008 court case, which involved depositions about Epstein prowling for victims at Mar-a-Lago (and this is a big reason why the story took off at all, The Miami Herald was the only sizable media outlet to report on Epstein).



And the FBI. And whoever Epstein was working for to obtain all the blackmail material.

That sounds a lot like he is trying to warn people.

There's this though

https://twitter.com/TimOBrien/status/1147688866289262592?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1147688866289262592&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.breitbart.com%2Fthe-media%2F2019%2F07%2F08%2Fcorporate-media-push-trump-jeffrey-epstein-conspiracy-theories-without-evidence%2F

The same source does claim he visited it only once.

He rode on his plane ONCE, but not to the island, just because they happened to be going the same direction. He also shortly attended ONE of his parties. Enough to see he didn't want to be involved. They has a business relationship of some kind in real-estate that was short lived and ended with conflict. That is about the sum of it.

Well yeah, obviously.

I mean at any point this leak is going to be shut down and silenced. This sort of leak is a major liability for the political elite. It's also a MAJOR liability for the two Pres candidates at the time of thee 2016 election - Clinton and Trump.

I think it's pretty much confirmed that Clinton had been abroad his private jets and islands.

I've read some conflicting info on Trump though -- as there is info that he's helped prosecutors involved in the Epstein prosecution, but there's also some info stating that he was aboard the planes and had parties with Epstein....

Who knows I guess. The only person with the info is dead now.