Pages:
Author

Topic: Bought an account , and received a negative reputation a month later - page 3. (Read 3801 times)

hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
Hah,  Quickseller.  I just take his comments with a gigantic grain of salt.  I wish there was some way to remove him from my trust list.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
theymos finally sent me an IP-redacted seclog AFTER Twipple quoted theymos sending the IP-unredacted one.

Code:
+---------------------+---------------+----------+
| UTC Time            | ip            | type     |
+---------------------+---------------+----------+
| 2015-01-25 14:57:57 | x             | Password |
| 2015-01-25 17:53:01 | x             | Password |
| 2015-01-31 10:49:55 | x             | Password |
| 2015-01-31 10:53:13 | x             | Password |
+---------------------+---------------+----------+

Password events 2 & 3 were from IPs in a netblock with munir.ahmed @ ptcl.net.pk in the WHOIS. Googled that email and found http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=CZPFGta1 - is that Ume?

abuse @ rdsnet.ro in WHOIS for the first IP.
jacek @ euronet.net.pl & piotrs @ euronet.net.pl in WHOIS for the last IP.

In an account sale, I can see if seller password starts as x (their original password), is provided to an escrow as x, the escrow changes it to y, gives it to the buyer as y, and the buyer changes it to z. That's 2 changes. But why change the password 4 times?

This all makes less sense as time goes on.

Yes , thats Ume. So Twipple changed the password on 25th , and provided it to Ume (for the loan) . Then Ume changed the password himself. (2nd one). Then when he sold it to me, He changed the password to the one which is in the the PM image I sent to you(3rd one), and then I am the last one to change it(4th)  after that.

legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
theymos finally sent me an IP-redacted seclog AFTER Twipple quoted theymos sending the IP-unredacted one.

Code:
+---------------------+---------------+----------+
| UTC Time            | ip            | type     |
+---------------------+---------------+----------+
| 2015-01-25 14:57:57 | x             | Password |
| 2015-01-25 17:53:01 | x             | Password |
| 2015-01-31 10:49:55 | x             | Password |
| 2015-01-31 10:53:13 | x             | Password |
+---------------------+---------------+----------+

Password events 2 & 3 were from IPs in a netblock with munir.ahmed @ ptcl.net.pk in the WHOIS. Googled that email and found http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=CZPFGta1 - is that Ume?

abuse @ rdsnet.ro in WHOIS for the first IP.
jacek @ euronet.net.pl & piotrs @ euronet.net.pl in WHOIS for the last IP.

In an account sale, I can see if seller password starts as x (their original password), is provided to an escrow as x, the escrow changes it to y, gives it to the buyer as y, and the buyer changes it to z. That's 2 changes. But why change the password 4 times?

This all makes less sense as time goes on.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
It seems that the sale was in fact faked and he slipped up that no one caught on. I would prepare to get your inbox spammed by a lot of PM's from this person.
Quickseller now whats your problem again ? Why do you think it was faked ? I was the one who started the scam accusation against Ume(before any negative trust was added) , Why would I be stupid enough to do that ?

This?

-snip-
Compare this:

Hi, This is an accusation against Ume https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ume-366936

I bought this account from him this month. Obviously, I am wiilling to provide all the proof for it.

"This" month=March.

With this:

I bought the account from Ume on 31st January.

That month=January. 2 whole months off.

 -snip-
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250


It seems that the sale was in fact faked and he slipped up that no one caught on. I would prepare to get your inbox spammed by a lot of PM's from this person.
Quickseller now whats your problem again ? Why do you think it was faked ? I was the one who started the scam accusation against Ume(before any negative trust was added) , Why would I be stupid enough to do that ?
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
Ok, then the only PM I'm interested in at this point is from a mod/staff member who can show a preponderance of the evidence (logs, hostnames, etc) one way or the other. Don't PM me again Twipple, unless a mod/staff has told you they PMed me that first.

I would be happy to PM an admin or Mod to check that for you and confirm it.
I would also be happy to have an escrow log in to my account and check the messages to confirm that.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
Ok, then the only PM I'm interested in at this point is from a mod/staff member who can show a preponderance of the evidence (logs, hostnames, etc) one way or the other. Don't PM me again Twipple, unless a mod/staff has told you they PMed me that first.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
I might be able to halp you if you send me some BTC as a firned  Cheesy

It seems that the sale was in fact faked and he slipped up that no one caught on. I would prepare to get your inbox spammed by a lot of PM's from this person.

I knew that something was going to happen similar to this when you got tee-added to BadBears list.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
Can't make sense out of this PM I just received, HALP!

Hi, This is an accusation against Ume https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ume-366936

I bought this account from him this month. Obviously, I am wiilling to provide all the proof for it.

"This" month=March.

With this:

I bought the account from Ume on 31st January.

That month=January. 2 whole months off.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLezV_FmX38

https://bitcointalk.org/seclog.php only goes back 1 month, so I can't verify whether the password was changed at the alleged time of account sale.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I think it is too late, it's better to avoid this type of thread (better to "discuss" via PM). Good luck.

Well Honestly, I don't mind it being late. I did send him a PM, but he never replied but continued the discussion here.
Its good to have such memebers in the community who keep a watch out for scams. I created this account lolled, for the exact same purpose.
But Quickseller is overdoing it. Its pretty clear that I bought Twipple, even then he chose to not remove his trust.

No, you sent me one PM and then literally 5 mins later you created this thread.


Thats not true. I sent you a message yesterday . Here is proof. Still denying it ?




I am going to ask you one last thing
I am not sure about the signing transactions part yet, but please confirm this for me :
Are you saying that Twipple was an alt of taco , because the address that twipple posted : 15ZX2yUZio9HeSWUeWubxznQyaYcYFBFzB

had the funds move into another address 17c2cHYmTT4LzRfi3UPP8ozcRHbxTrwca6 , which has a previous input from an address: 1Fo6Uy8JWnV9SnDM5LBnYA8nnCQgbfbyDT

Which was involved with taco's address ?







copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
I think it is too late, it's better to avoid this type of thread (better to "discuss" via PM). Good luck.

Well Honestly, I don't mind it being late. I did send him a PM, but he never replied but continued the discussion here.
Its good to have such memebers in the community who keep a watch out for scams. I created this account lolled, for the exact same purpose.
But Quickseller is overdoing it. Its pretty clear that I bought Twipple, even then he chose to not remove his trust.

No, you sent me one PM and then literally 5 mins later you created this thread.

I disagree with most of what you said above however I am not going to respond to each point individually.

Either way. Just because you purchased an account that was involved with a scam and/or associated with a scammer does not mean that any negative trust that results from such scam should be removed.
/thread
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I think it is too late, it's better to avoid this type of thread (better to "discuss" via PM). Good luck.

Well Honestly, I don't mind it being late. I did send him a PM, but he never replied but continued the discussion here.
Its good to have such memebers in the community who keep a watch out for scams. I created this account lolled, for the exact same purpose.
But Quickseller is overdoing it. Its pretty clear that I bought Twipple, even then he chose to not remove his trust.
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
I think it is too late, it's better to avoid this type of thread (better to "discuss" via PM). Good luck.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
The message above inthe picture  shows that Ume contacted TBZ at a time , hourse before he sold and gave me the account details (2nd picture in the link above. )
Ume was banned for some other reason, and Twipple got banned due to begging  ^

It happened at the same time as a coincidence, and can be confirmed by a mod.
Nope. And how would you know the reason that Ume was banned? lol(led)
What Nope? How do you know it wasn't banned?
Did I ever say I know the reason why Ume was banned ? lol(led) back.
I just said,I know why Twipple was banned. It was because Ume before selling the account, sent a message begging. To prove which, I provided the picture above.


5. I was the one who created the scam accusation against Ume, and its funny, that I am the one paying for it.
If you seriously think that you could create a scam accusation against Ume one day and then the same day try to buy an account from him and seriously think it is not involved in some kind of scam then I am sorry but you are an idiot.
Ok , here you are wrong again. Without reading things , you shouldn't comment.
The scam accusation against Ume wasn't against some shitty he had done. It was for the reason , that he was giving out loans only to get more accounts in his possession. He hasn't been in any scam that I know of.
I checked Twipples account before buying it. It wasn't involved involved in any scam.

5. I was the one who created the scam accusation against Ume, and its funny, that I am the one paying for it.
If you seriously think that you could create a scam accusation against Ume one day and then the same day try to buy an account from him and seriously think it is not involved in some kind of scam then I am sorry but you are an idiot.
I am off for work, and will wait for Ume to reply when he is back online .
Right, "he"

Excuse me ? I can't go to work without your permission now ? I don't have time like you to stay on the forum 24 hours, farming 100's of accounts and selling them .
Maybe you should let your ego out of the way ,and make a sensible judgement, that I purchased an account from Ume, and I am not scamming or was involved in any scam  of any kind.


ALso, I am not sure about the signing transactions part yet, but please confirm this for me :
Are you saying that Twipple was an alt of taco , because the address that twipple posted : 15ZX2yUZio9HeSWUeWubxznQyaYcYFBFzB

had the funds move into another address 17c2cHYmTT4LzRfi3UPP8ozcRHbxTrwca6 , which has a previous input from an address: 1Fo6Uy8JWnV9SnDM5LBnYA8nnCQgbfbyDT

Which was involved with taco ?
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100

1. Twipple takes a loan from Ume, and gives his account as collateral. - During this time Twipple was a Member status
No, as shown above, Ume and Twipple were likely the same person before the loan was taken out.


No they were not. Look at the posting history . I can give an escrow or you access to the account, and you can see all the messages of the Twipple account, to see Twipple and Ume are not the same person. Twipple defaulted on a loan, and that is how Ume got it.

4. I contacted Ume , and bought Twipple's account, and right after I bought it, I saw a message sent to TBZ before I bought it begging for money. I just ignored it, and a day later Twipple got banned for 7 days due to Begging.
First you said it was banned after two days, I have shown that they were banned at the same time, now you are saying it was banned the next day. Which one is it?

Does it  matter ? Finding faults in statements that don't matter ? I don't remember if it was a day or 2. I jsut remember it getting banned during that time period. Its not even relevant in this context, but you are just saaying this to find lies and making your point strong through an argument that doesn't matter.

Really ? It does prove, that Ume used the account for begging before I bought it from him.




full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
If you are talking about Ume, you should have a look at this.
He got away by claiming that his account was hacked.

Well thats what I have always been saying. I still don't see why Quickseller would neg rep, when clearly I bought the account.
If I took a loan from Twipple(as Twipple), I would just get back the possession of the account by just paying back. Not defaulting and then hoping to buy it back.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Hi, This is an accusation against Ume https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ume-366936

I bought this account from him this month. Obviously, I am wiilling to provide all the proof for it.

I would request Quickseller to remove the negative trust that he has put on it. This account was posted by Ume in an auction.


Also, before it was sold to me, Ume sent a PM to the ButterZone begging for money , and I was banned from the forum for a week for that.

I can obviously, provide proof for it, but am outside. I have asked Ume to clear it up . Sent him a message.

Also, I am requesting Quickseller to remove his negative trust.



Hi guys . I m Ume .

Just wanted to clear somethings .
(I'm replying from mobile cant add refrences)
First of all i started loaning sone btc to users with collateral but as the user twipple came in asked for loan when his member status was (member) he asked me for loan of .05 or so cant remember . After the due date of paying i created a thread .saying help me what to do with his account he did'nt contact me never spends the money which i lent . So what should i do they all said sell his account . But i did like 10 posts and still it remain on member level . After with the current owner of twipple paid me upfront without using escrow and i release details (twipple was not me )
@lolled did you bought account using alt ?

I never hacked or scammed any person here .

@quickseller you know that i made a mistake only i gave rep my self you said to remove i did . But after that i never gave loan to anyone because i thought i dont have enough reputation or experience .

I never beg here for anything . Never scammed anyone . For being good on this forum you get neg trust thats not fair .
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1064
If you are talking about Ume, you should have a look at this.
He got away by claiming that his account was hacked.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
The reason I think they are one and the same is because twipple did not start posting until almost exactly until the loan was due, then stopped posting at almost the exactly the same time that ume was banned, and resumed posting at almost the exact same time that ume was likely unbanned. Additionally the funds from the loan were not spent until after the loan was due.

Additionally, the posting style of both accounts is very low quality and spammy.

Well , Like I had already said before, here is the explanation to that.

1. Twipple takes a loan from Ume, and gives his account as collateral. - During this time Twipple was a Member status
No, as shown above, Ume and Twipple were likely the same person before the loan was taken out.
2. After the due date is over, Ume created this thread : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/want-some-help-regarding-loans-941098 
asking if its fine if he sells Twipples account  as he didn;t pay back on loan.
Agreed, however I still argue that they are the same person the entire time.
3. Ume , then created an auction for selling an account : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/selling-fm-941258
He realized, that he would get a better price for selling the account if he got it to a full member status. And he made some posts after seizing the account .
I won't dispute that.
4. I contacted Ume , and bought Twipple's account, and right after I bought it, I saw a message sent to TBZ before I bought it begging for money. I just ignored it, and a day later Twipple got banned for 7 days due to Begging.
First you said it was banned after two days, I have shown that they were banned at the same time, now you are saying it was banned the next day. Which one is it?
Here is a picture :
http://i.imgur.com/aQqEP15.png
that proves nothing.
The message above inthe picture  shows that Ume contacted TBZ at a time , hourse before he sold and gave me the account details (2nd picture in the link above. )
Ume was banned for some other reason, and Twipple got banned due to begging  ^

It happened at the same time as a coincidence, and can be confirmed by a mod.
Nope. And how would you know the reason that Ume was banned? lol(led)

5. I was the one who created the scam accusation against Ume, and its funny, that I am the one paying for it.
If you seriously think that you could create a scam accusation against Ume one day and then the same day try to buy an account from him and seriously think it is not involved in some kind of scam then I am sorry but you are an idiot.
I am off for work, and will wait for Ume to reply when he is back online .
Right, "he"



Either way. Just because you purchased an account that was involved with a scam and/or associated with a scammer does not mean that any negative trust that results from such scam should be removed.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
The reason I think they are one and the same is because twipple did not start posting until almost exactly until the loan was due, then stopped posting at almost the exactly the same time that ume was banned, and resumed posting at almost the exact same time that ume was likely unbanned. Additionally the funds from the loan were not spent until after the loan was due.

Additionally, the posting style of both accounts is very low quality and spammy.

Well , Like I had already said before, here is the explanation to that.

1. Twipple takes a loan from Ume, and gives his account as collateral. - During this time Twipple was a Member status

2. After the due date is over, Ume created this thread : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/want-some-help-regarding-loans-941098  
asking if its fine if he sells Twipples account  as he didn;t pay back on loan.

3. Ume , then created an auction for selling an account : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/selling-fm-941258
He realized, that he would get a better price for selling the account if he got it to a full member status. And he made some posts after seizing the account .

4. I contacted Ume , and bought Twipple's account, and right after I bought it, I saw a message sent to TBZ before I bought it begging for money. I just ignored it, and a day later Twipple got banned for 7 days due to Begging.

Here is a picture :
http://i.imgur.com/aQqEP15.png

The message above inthe picture  shows that Ume contacted TBZ at a time , hourse before he sold and gave me the account details (2nd picture in the link above. )
Ume was banned for some other reason, and Twipple got banned due to begging  ^

It happened at the same time as a coincidence, and can be confirmed by a mod.


5. I was the one who created the scam accusation against Ume, and its funny, that I am the one paying for it.

I am off for work, and will wait for Ume to reply when he is back online .


Pages:
Jump to: