Topic: Bounties are STUPID - page 23. (Read 4894 times)
Stupid you say is too hash a word although I do not know your disappointment or the loses but bounties are not stupid.They really play major roles in the success story of evey project and all developers understand this.That is why even though investors complain,bounties still leave on.
What's the point in distributing 2% towards bounties??
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
If you are not satisfied then simply leave and find something better, we dont need bounty hunters who are not satisfied with their work. And these bounty participants are not useful for the projects because everytime they complain. If you promote something then you should be a positive. Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
What's the point in distributing 2% towards bounties??
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
Right. Actually, investors are not interested in people who may have bonuses but do not invest in money. I still like the paid options. Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
It is only a publicizing technique. What's more, numerous individuals knows the icos because of bounties. It doesnt cost such a great amount for sharing on the off chance that you contrast the amount they gain and it
Bounty is a very smart way because it can cut advertising costs. this is a very good way because in this way there are many people who can invest even though it's only small so I think Bounty is the best method for new companies that need investors to develop their projects.we can see from the big projects that exist now, there are many big projects because of the Bounty.
It is not honest that some people receive tokens for free while others pay money for it, but the projects need an advertisement, and the easiest way is to allocate a part of the total supply tokens for this purpose. I think the decision is to make the Bounty payments in Bitcoin or Ethereum, not in the project tokens.
You mean that some of bointy participants are stupid? Yeah, i agree with you, there are a lot of stupid people, who always asks "when moon", "when payment", "when end"..
It is only a publicizing technique. What's more, numerous individuals knows the icos because of bounties. It doesnt cost such a great amount for sharing on the off chance that you contrast the amount they gain and it
the distribution of tokens and bounty participants dumping it on the exchange on the day the token is listed is a good strategy for the project promotion and for it to be listed on other exchanges. besides the marketing purpose for the project more parties will be interested to the project if they see volume in the exchange.
What's the point in distributing 2% towards bounties??
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
Why you think so?
Am certain the main why you say bounties are inept is a result of the manner in which the bounties are dump when the token get into trade. Yet, we need to take a gander at the great part and advantages bounties likewise offers to icos, free advertising at no cost to the undertaking. I dont think the issue is the bounties dump rather it is the conveyance of the task. on the off chance that a venture is in the same class as the whitepaper. It will justify itself and speculators will be beneficial and cheerful over the long haul.
Bounties are very good for every successful project. Bounty hunters do not just perform their tasks, take their pay and walk away with it. Some may sell immediately but for most, they become part of the project and thus support it even after the ICO. This mostly gives the project a stronger support.
It is part of their marketing strategy to hire people that will help them spread the word. That is one of their way to advertise their product to reach people. This will attract potential investors. There are many scam ICOs, but there are still legit and have potentials in the future.
I think bounties are not stupid. The thing is bounties helps keep the project going. This the means of spreading the words and you know most of the bounty hunters are also investors. This is not stupid.
I believe that Bounty plays a big role in the development and success of the project.
actually, it all depends on how we can choose a good bounty to follow. the bounty that legit will give satisfactory results, while a failed bounty will not pay the bounty hunters, so as a bounty hunter we must be smart to choose a bounty so we can get a legitimate bounty.
What's the point in distributing 2% towards bounties??
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
Of course not all bounties are ico stupid. Therefore you must be careful in choosing the words that you will make. I still trust the bounty that I followed and certainly the ico goal too.
Promotion is a marketing strategy. And the allocation for bounties is usually very small, only about 1-5% of the tokens sold. The development team must have considered it, because this forum, social media, and articles have influenced the popularity of an ICO.
Participation in bounty programs lately does not bring the same profits, but do not hang your nose, the market sooner or later will go up, and then all your tokens will rise in price, the main thing is to remain patient.
believe it or not, bounties are great ways to promote your ICO
consider the fact that ICOs are startups that are not fully functional.
paying for bounties just similar to paying for marketing, only they are paying their own coin, which is way cheaper than hiring a marketing firm.
You are right, with a Bounty, every new company does not need to pay advertising directly because with Bounty they can pay if the company is successful and also cheaper. there are many companies that are successful because of advertising through Bounty so I think this is an effective way.consider the fact that ICOs are startups that are not fully functional.
paying for bounties just similar to paying for marketing, only they are paying their own coin, which is way cheaper than hiring a marketing firm.
believe it or not, bounties are great ways to promote your ICO
consider the fact that ICOs are startups that are not fully functional.
paying for bounties just similar to paying for marketing, only they are paying their own coin, which is way cheaper than hiring a marketing firm.
You are right, with a Bounty, every new company does not need to pay advertising directly because with Bounty they can pay if the company is successful and also cheaper. there are many companies that are successful because of advertising through Bounty so I think this is an effective way. consider the fact that ICOs are startups that are not fully functional.
paying for bounties just similar to paying for marketing, only they are paying their own coin, which is way cheaper than hiring a marketing firm.
I don't concur your point. Numerous bounties may be trick yet the manner in which the reason for existing is a sharp method to free promoting themselves. Coincidentally, the are some great bounties undertaking to join, in any case, rather than utilizing your available time on surfing the web, you can take an interest in ventures and even get more learning and smart thought. It isn't moronic in any way
Jump to: