Topic: Bounties required KYC. - page 2. (Read 3472 times)
Many ICO projects require KYC, but after completing the task of bounty hunters, they want the kyc, and I think this is ridiculous. I don't find it right to change the rules later.
I believe that KYC doesn't help the fight with scammers. I don’t like to share my personal data. No one guarantees me the confidentiality and security of this information. Already now my email is filled with spam, because in many spreadsheets this information was visible and accessible. And it’s no secret that you can buy everything in the Internet and documents too.I think that when hunter didn't get the verification KYC -it's another opportunity not to pay for the work of the bounty hunters in the project.
Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
No, it is managers job to remove such entries and to remove spammers from campaign and I don't feel comfortable to share my information. Good portion of these information will go to scammers, they will sell it on dark market and you could get into trouble when they use data. In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
In principle, to some extent I agree with this requirement, for a bounty company this is useful, it will remove multi-accounts, but on the other hand you transfer your personal information into the wrong hands and you don’t know how it can be used
I definitely do not agree with this procedure. For me, confirming my identity is not the most desirable action. I would just like to participate in the bounty and not reveal my identity
I don't think there's any need to reveal your identity right now. I always feel uncomfortable about this and I think that my data at any time can disappear somewhere that can not be pleasant to me
Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
I think it is very risky for bounty if you use KYC to prevent multiple accounts, it's just that you might be able to use KYC without an ID card, maybe the proof of address is enough, or using an IP detector In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
KYC for bounty i am not support this because i think need kyc for their customer who purchase their token as a bounty hunter i am not their customer i am just promote their project. so i think no need kyc for bounty hunter.
Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
If you are seeing any bounty campaign that requires kyc from the participants then you need to stay away from such a bounty, so many people are so willing to give out their private information to people they don't know all in the name of getting some free coins without considering the fact that these informations can be sold on the black market to hackers
Agreed but kyc is still rare bounty manager that apply may be more find bounty manager that requires enter POA. Just yesterday I found bounty a reset their rules because a lot of fake accounts or multiple accounts. It is actually very detrimental to us who fair play and kyc required to be more fair again.
I think that the introduction of the KYC for the bounty will not eliminate the scammers but will force them to buy fake documents. In general this will contradict the anonymity of the crypto currency.
It is rather ridiculous and tragic that ICO teams, which themselves do not undergo any verification and often simply disappear with the collected funds of investors, also demand that they provide our confidential information. The paradox is that we are not their clients, because we do not invest in their projects. A client is one who pays his money and such clients are investors. The ICO team pays us for the services we provide to advertise their ICO projects, so they are our clients. Do our customers require us to pass a KYC check?
Now, most of the companies are asking for KYC in order to get a bounty reward because they need to follow the audit procedure in order to track where the tokens have been distributed. Whether KYC is required or not we don't know but surely we have submitted the documents in order to get the bounty reward.
I dont agree with this making distribution too hassle and time consuming for participants but still its their rules as a ICO initiators. If you dont agree with them just dont join with their bounties. Still lots of potential projects out there that dont require KYC on their Bounty.
Although I don't fully support the idea of revealing ones identity in the name of KYC however its becoming very worrisome these days as cheating has become order of the day, thus KYC will checkmate all these forms of untrustworthy mostly associated with bounty hunters.
gone are the days when alot of investors pump money to invest in ICO and most ICO reach hardcap so they have no problem when bounty hunters dump their token because percentage allocated to them is very small but today its very rear to see most ico reaching hardcap so most ICO are looking for ways to prevent dashing out free token to hunter that doesnt merit it and KYC is one of the effective way to do that. some ICO are operating in countries that crypto is regulated so they need kyc.
Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
You are a little confused with the gift of God scrambled eggs. The KYC check has as its task the prevention of laundering dirty money and it is not intended so that someone does not have several accounts on this forum. For such states as the USA and China, which actually became the initiators of such a check, believe me, how many accounts will there be anyway. Therefore, KYC verification should be applied only to investors. I don’t like at all that some ICO teams that do not pass any checks themselves and are more likely to be fraudsters violate my right to confidentiality, and using fraud when, without prior agreement on the conditions of joining the ICO signature campaign, us as bounty hunters, undergo such a KYC check at the end of the ICO or even after its completion. The meaning of such a test is completely distorted and is used only to ensure that part of the bounty hunters do not pay out the tokens they have earned. In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?
In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
It’s good to have KYC cause it’s starting to look like the majority of those that don’t do KYC are scammers. Just like when you’re trading and looking for which exchanger to join, it’s always recommended to join the ones that are requesting KYC and also being regulated, cause others that don’t do that are usually scammers. So it’s good for ICOs to have KYC. In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.
What is your Opinion?
Free comment.
I totally agree with you mate, and you get a lot point here.
Also it would stop all people have intention to make a malicious activity.
Also it would stop all people have intention to make a malicious activity.
if the bounty doesn't matter, as long as it's not an airdrop campaign! I doubt the Airdrop campaign must include KYC.
there is no harm in bounty requiring KYC because it is also a policy imposed by the development team from the bounty, yet in KYC most don't need to fill in the personal details that are too detailed, and also now most KYC can use driving licenses only and in a driving license even though there is no personal data that is too detailed and has a validity period, and one more thing, in my opinion, KYC is used only to find out if the participant in the bounty is actually a person or just a BOT.
Jump to: