Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 108. (Read 10495 times)
Your posting and the work that you are doing for them shows your quality. But they will only choose you from many people if they need quality marketing. Some of them are doing massive campaigns and they don't choose much. Forget about regulations in Bounties, that will never gonna live.
indeed I noticed an increasing number of bounty campaign participants. Especially it concerns social networks. In my opinion, managers should limit the number of participants.
Limit the number of participants is as it is dishonest in relation to those who did not have time to enter. I think it's better to focus on quality. For example, accept accounts with a minimum number of subscribers in the campaign - 5000.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Mostly people choose bounty campaign because there are a lot of people who got rich through joining many bountu campaign here, and as we can see joining Facebook, Twitter campaign is easy than joining any bounty campaign that is why many people choose to join bounty because less effort but has a big income if the bounty project will be success.
I think they should limit the number of participants, and the grading should be more serious. I see a lot of scoring bounty alike, though there are those who do not do or leave midway!
indeed I noticed an increasing number of bounty campaign participants. Especially it concerns social networks. In my opinion, managers should limit the number of participants.
More people are beginning to see the opportunities embedded in bounty campaigns. I think they should not be deprived from earning also. Rather those who have been there should try as much as possible to move to higher ranks and try other possible means of earning, apart from the use of social media for bounty.
this will be a problem because when the participants bounty too much then the pay in the can will be less because it is divided to the bounty hunter
Companies are interested when there are a lot of participants. They are not very interested in how much we earn. They need to do a lot of advertising for some budget. The more advertising (participants), the more information about the project
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I noticed that some bounty campaigns already have some limits of people or budget, so they simply close the acceptances of new people once they reach that limit. But more people would also say more advertising for the devs, so it depends if they really care about the quantity of tokens the bounty hunters will get or not. They should also consider that some people could leave the campaign if there is too much competition at a certain point, because the gains would be minimum.What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Bounty campaigns bounty is work that can be used for people that trying to leave their hard work in real life and going to freelance some time
crypto market is expanding everyday ,so more people jump in this forum to get some free coins through bounty.it would be nice if ico projects limit number of participant for every task , that will help improving the quality of posts plus raising the profit for each participant.
Last year i got good amounts. At the moment thereare thousands of participants with multiple fake accounta and i prefer to invest instead of bounties.
There will be lesser for facebook and twitter I think because later its not going to be allowed there soon. Most of the participants who only use facebook and twitter may have to join the forum if they want to earn coins. This could become a mandatory for those who wants to participate in the every campaign. Sad part for them is that they need to have more merits to rank and earn more.
I believe the bounty managers can set other stiff measures to measure rewards for bounty thereby leaving those going into it for cheap money no other option but to opt out
Than more participants than less rewards. But bounty with limited count of participants has hard conditions. I like BeEasy ICO project.
There is no need to do reports. But the conditions of Bounty are rather critical to social accounts as for me.
There is no need to do reports. But the conditions of Bounty are rather critical to social accounts as for me.
There are more participants in bounties but more and more bounties appear as well. I would say it will be a situation like in that proverb: "For every product, there is a buyer" (read "For each bounty, there will be people interested to work").
Oh, It is big problem for participants. Welocal has not too many participants. Join Welocal.
That's a problem that who's behind the bounty should think about.
Putting some restrictions may be helpful, but maybe not profitable if lesser people are joining, you should think in both sides, the only good way is finding a good balance between quality restrictions and people joining
Putting some restrictions may be helpful, but maybe not profitable if lesser people are joining, you should think in both sides, the only good way is finding a good balance between quality restrictions and people joining
More bounty participants is good for the ICO projects, it mean that this projects is made known to more people and potential investors. As long as the ICO project is good and successful, I don't think any participant will mind how many tokens he gets paid in the end. Any regulation and allocation is really up to the bounty manager, and don't think imposing any rigid official regulation will do any good to these free for all ICOs.
We can not stop newcomers in the bounty campaign. But there must be some limitation of participants in the bounty campaign. Otherwise bounty work is loosing charm. Some bounty become spam and some pays very less.
For companies, it is beneficial and effective for them. But for the participants, that means they will choose the bounty by the competition and the reward benefits. But sometimes Bounty program really ruins the ecosystem for those who want to earn money.
Jump to: