Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 106. (Read 10495 times)
yes you'll right, bounty is more popular in this cryptocurrency.. last year too many participants will enter here to get extra income lfor their daily needs. last year its too easy to rank up and increase profit,but for now its too hard to get rank up because of the merit system thats why other participants didnt continue their account because of their own reason. i want to suggest that to have an easy way to get a merit..
There are many bounty campaigns that limit the amount of bounty hunters from the very beginning. Typically, this is 200-500 participants. Try to view the forum more often to be among these lucky ones.
I've seen such a campaign bounty, but rarely enough. Many projects simply close registration for new members when they see that things are going well. If things go wrong, they are recruiting participants to the very end. As a result, each participant receives a meager amount of profit.
I doubt that in the near future something will change. How can you choose the best participants in the social bounty? Even a schoolboy can cope with social bounty, so there are always a lot of participants. Another thing in the bounty of creating content.
It is true that a lot of new participants have joined bounty campaigns and this has reduced the reward which will be distributed. But the fact remains that there are some campaigns like signature which usually set limits of participation and usually have the highest percentage of rewards.
The forum is not as easy to get along as it used to be. Mere website registration might take some dollar from you, then u think of getting merit or perhaps put some currency to be copper member. I already knew some times back with a post on how the forum will prepare for a large forum membership.
That is true....too many participants but, Let the money go round! Participants who needs more money should prove by way of putting in more effort. Besides, we have more ICO'S coming out on daily basis.
I have a suspicion that some bounty platforms use a farm bot, an example: at night I receive the notice, on bountyhive the new company, and in the morning there are no empty seats for participants any more. How to explain it? 
It's a publicity campaign. It is annoying to you but the opposite is a good sign for the development team. Anyhow, the% of allocations for the campaign remain unchanged
maybe it's also the cause that makes total supply for bounty decreased, and the number of requirements that must be done by bounty campaign participants, as should reports every week and kyc.
According to my observation if one campaign limit the number of bounty hunters that able to participate the loses is not for the bounty hunters but for them. Bounty hunters play some major roles to promote the project effectively.
Developers are interested in the maximum possible number of participants. That's why I expect that rewards for participants of bounties will decrease with time. People from poor countries can participate for smaller rewards.
We have already mentioned above, and I will agree with this. The problem is not the number of participants, but some of them are registered and do nothing. They are shielded by their shares.
I don't know... everybody should be able to join bounties if he wants, you don't have to bee that close, people may lose interest
There are many bounty campaigns that limit the amount of bounty hunters from the very beginning. Typically, this is 200-500 participants. Try to view the forum more often to be among these lucky ones.
There are too many participants in bounty campaign, the competition is getting high. We cannot avoid it because peoples have right to enjoy this industry. So I hope that this industry will also get better.
It seems to me that the problem is not that there are too many participants in Bounty projects. The problem is that too many projects are scam. This is a much bigger problem than the number of participants.
Not surprisingly, this type of earnings is becoming more popular every day. High competition will cause a reduction in payments. With each passing day, the number of new ISO projects is shrinking, which ultimately leads to a profit cuts per person or a tightening of entry barriers.
Have a look into Crowdholding.
They are a co-creation platform where you sign up for free, give feedback and earn crypto for your responses to tasks. They already have over 15k users and I think they are going to grow and have a very good future.
It's great because you can respond to tasks and earn other altcoins (DeepOnion, ITT, Smartcash) and also Crowdholding's YUP (which is on exchanges)
If you want to actually contribute towards crypto projects and also earn for your good ideas, check out Crowdholding.
https://www.crowdholding.com
They are a co-creation platform where you sign up for free, give feedback and earn crypto for your responses to tasks. They already have over 15k users and I think they are going to grow and have a very good future.
It's great because you can respond to tasks and earn other altcoins (DeepOnion, ITT, Smartcash) and also Crowdholding's YUP (which is on exchanges)
If you want to actually contribute towards crypto projects and also earn for your good ideas, check out Crowdholding.
https://www.crowdholding.com
We will not see less participants with you, the more this direction develops, the more participants will be in any business, and the crypto currency will not be an exception. But all this will only facilitate the involvement of new people in crypto-currencies, and this is very good news, at least for me. Success in this direction depends only on the number of people.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Yes, too much people now are tended to be involved in any ICO. And sure, other participants have less opportunities to earn good rewards. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Jump to: