Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 35. (Read 10495 times)
too many participants is actually very good for ico as more and more people will help promotion. but for us this is very little bad because the results obtained are also getting less of course
I think that is good. The more participants, the more popular the ICO will be. Instead they give the token to the participants instead of giving out money to advertise their project with a larger sum for the bounty.
The more participants that appear here then the good stuff for us. When they appear, then the chances of success were getting bigger and have no effect with the lack of our income.
Last year my wife got like 20k in total now she doing even more but got only 400 in 4 months!
Yes, the more participants the less reward that will be obtained. But in some bounty there are limitations on the number of participants, examples such as bounty monoreto. They limit only 1000 participants in the socmed campaign. On bountyhive also applies the same thing. So if you're worried about the least reward you get it's a bounty that limits the number of participants. Or you can join the bounty that gives the token isnt a stake on the bounty.
Just think positive, okay many new participants in the market now this reduce the rewards of others But i think that way to get potential buyers, because if the project is good, the buyers can work for bounty and invest in tokens sale and get the both
It is inevitable because crypto gets more and more popular and of course many people like the idea to get some tokens for free.
I used to register in all bountyhive's ICO a couple of months ago, now it's impossible to jump in, lol. Even new project is already full. (I'm talking about telegram, twitter and facebook)
At the moment, you need to be around the clock on the bountyhive and catch campaigns to jump in)) sometimes I think that some of the participants are just bots.
More people - less profit in one hand and more different Bounties in another. It's better to take part in those which are more limited campaigns. .
I used to register in all bountyhive's ICO a couple of months ago, now it's impossible to jump in, lol. Even new project is already full. (I'm talking about telegram, twitter and facebook)
If there is a bounty project that has enough participants, that means Bounty is so popular that many people are interested in following it. And the influence of the many participants bounty this tehadap bounty participants are on the distribution of tokens later. the more participants bounty, the smaller the part we get. but in fact it is not a serious problem.
I think most of bounty program are strict on there rule but the problem here was it so many bot account still joining in campaign and more bounty hunters was big help on bounty programs because it helps a lot to find more investors.
Now very often many bounty managers began to appear campaigns with a limited number of participants.The main thing is not to miss such campaigns.
I think this is the right decision, the fewer participants, the more rewards, which means everyone is happy)
still I would introduce a restriction on the ranks, starting from member +
It's call "competition". Everything related with money is not easy. And i think all project like a huge amount of participant in their bounty campaign, because it'll help them in marketing and the project more and more popular
Now very often many bounty managers began to appear campaigns with a limited number of participants.The main thing is not to miss such campaigns.
We can't limit the participants in every bounty campaign since there motive is like us to earn reward for every bounty campaign. So any chance to participate in any campaign will make them consider as an opportunity to earn so they grab them immediately.
there are still many campaign options that you can participate in bounty. such as youtube campaign, article campaign, newsletter, and signature campaign.
Hi.
I also think like you. There are just more and more people interested in cryptocurrencies, which will of course make the stakes smaller.
I also think like you. There are just more and more people interested in cryptocurrencies, which will of course make the stakes smaller.
It is sad, but true, that bounties will became less and less profitable with time, because to limit the participants isnt good for the projects advertising.
In my opinion and to be honest I do not think that it is worth to particiapte in twitter or facebook bounties. The only time i took part in twitter bounty was for an ICO about a year ago and that time also I hardly got 30$ of tokens, i cant image what would be the situation is now.
Instead try content/article writing campaigns.
Instead try content/article writing campaigns.
Jump to: