Ideally there can never be too many participants for a bounty program from the project's perspective unless the bounty pool is capped, I.e. from a hunters perspective it means 2 things when a bounty has so much participants,
1. the project is great and everyone wants a piece of the tokens
2. The bounty budget is very high and hunters want the money
The first type of bounty I would ideally go for, because I know the tokens will be valuable in the future, while the second type I may pass on because why have 10k people competing for $1million when you can have 500 competing for $500k
Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 36. (Read 10495 times)
I advise you not to participate in such bounty. I advise you to spend time finding prospective companies with a small number of participants.
Although too many participants in bounty program but the number of the ICO also increased alot, there are new ICO everyday and this is need advertising. So more participants in bounty will better to get more investor, and to promote the advantages of cryptocurrency.
I must say that when the participants of a campaign are bigger, we can not get all of our rewards. If the campaign is for longtime, then the reward we receive will be less, because while the campaign takes longer the participants are increasing. Or I think maybe even so many participants are joining a campaign because they know the project is good.
Everyone wants to make money, there is no one that will turn down the chance to be able to make a lot of money just from doing posts on a forum, this is why there are so many participants. It also works in the favor of the owners of the projects too, because the more people that are participating in their bounties, the more people that are promoting it, which means the more people that they can reach
As you say, too many people are participating in the bonus campaign making the rewards less and less, I think it is better to set a higher limit on participants as well as limit participants for a project.
or now many bounty hunter had participated in bounty campaign. they promote it to popular social media website like facebook and twitter more campaign more profit without releasing money. only have to do is patience and hard work. ask manager if you had a problem to its campaign.
I just hope that dev further increase the token that will be distributed to the bounty hunter if one day the project experience swelling bounty participants
This problem of overpopulation by participants of all types of generosity ICO projects, I do not yet see. To very promising campaigns of generosity ICO is really more interesting and there sometimes it gathers in the signature campaign for up to 300 participants or more, but in all the others it can be just a few dozen, and sometimes even a dozen is not recruited. Therefore, there is no need to limit the number of participants in the campaign for signing the ICO. And in general, it is necessary to introduce various kinds of restrictions. We already see what such limitations lead to, for example, the introduction of the merit system. We wanted better, but it turned out as always.
You can take part bounty which has limits dor participants. And nobody will make obstractions for you to earn on bounty good money. Bounties is already strict
I dont participate on bounty thst has too many participants because i know to myself that i will not earn a good profit when the bounty has too many participants so i just participated on bounty that has a limited participant only.
I think if bounty is crowded by investors and participants will increase the percentage of success
The choice is always yours! Choose those companies where the least number of people, either put up with it and do a good job)
You can take part bounty which has limits dor participants. And nobody will make obstractions for you to earn on bounty good money. Bounties is already strict
Yes, this problem is really very common, but I know that you can still find a bounty in which there will not be so many participants! In my opinion d all the same it is necessary to choose the bounty of a strong project, which will not be a scam!
If my opinion is now many bounty projects that limit the participants who will join the bounty. One of them is a sylon that limits signature participants so that later payment can be more leverage.
I think it is the policy of each dev that regulates the rule of bounty, we can not do anything because it proves more bounty participants then the more likely the project will be successful so we can only surrender
Yes, now in many bounty campaigns come a lot of participants. But still, sometimes come across such bounty, where few participants. I hope for me these bounty will be successful)
Yes I already know the phenomenon, and I feel the effects of too many campaign participants, rather than positive, so many know about the crypto world, and I do not mind the results that I have a little or a lot
too much is involved in the bounty because the bounty is too big for bitcoin signature but it is quite a bit because the manager is too busy but the bounty is really good because you really have to earn a little after a long time bounty hard work and perseverance
I do not think that it's such a problem. Yes, lots of people participate in bounties and thus leads to decreased stakes or whatever they call it. But if the project is legit then it's definitely worth trying. As for me, I try to participate only in bounties that I find most promising and perspective like that one
Jump to: