Actually, there are bounty campaigns which limits their participants. Though it is not that big of a deal really. Investors would tend to invest and, can, at the same time join bounty. They know too well that if they do believe the project then it is better to throw your money than catching some free small money being partitioned in different campaigns to a lot of participants. Also, participants would tend to find another campaign if they think there are too many participants already so in other words it tends to limit themselves rather than implementing something to limit them.
Yes it is really true. Last year there are so many users who creates so many account so that why developers or managers of this forum create an merit to have a bounty hunters who is really trusted and doing good without taking money eagerly. 
Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 40. (Read 10495 times)
There are too many participants in the bounty now because they know that this is very profitable. This is also a way to publicize their ICO through bounty campaigns to make people popular with investors.
In my opinion there are so many bounty that has too much participants specially in twitter and facebook. But it depend on bounty manager how many they want to accept, what about bounty manager limits thier participants upto 200-250 participants only specially in social media so that the participants can earn more salary.
Participants bounty quite a lot, it signifies that bounty really liked by the fans.
Following the ico project does not need much capital and little risk. The landing is also not complicated.
The number of people participating in the bounty is meager but they own too many media accounts, so the number of accounts listed in the spreadsheet is often very much. The number of reports listed above reaches thousands of accounts.
Maybe bounty is one easy way to earn money and profit in the world of crypto. Bounty does not require a lot of capital and bounty does not have a big risk as when we invest.
many problems at least the participants did not matter, I think a project is looking at the quality of our work and the current rankings. Maybe that's fair to me.
It's fine for me since we have to right to change the rules or what so ever because we are just like them. We're here because we wanted to earn some money and ofcourse many bounty hunters will benefit on the side of the coins since they can reach more people.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I just joined Welltrado bounty campaign.
Looks like a good project.
Will try to participate in only this one.
Participating in a bounty with too many participants means that you should expect less rewards because many of you are going to share the bounty pool allocated in a particular campaign. This also means that the project is good that's why many participated.
I am agree to you, the best Campaign to join has a limit participant. Certainly you have a great deal of sharing, and the spreadsheet is always updated. But I think it is not wrong to join a campaign with many participant as long as it is legit. If your reward is low, it is better to hold it until the value is high.
I am looking at the spreadsheet of every bounty program that launched so many bounty participants who follow it this way I think is not too problematic, the problem is nowadays very many bounty programs are not successful in ico and this will delay our profit or our income in bounty campaign.
Gentlemen! Do not forget that the number of ICO projects is also increasing, thereby increasing the number of places for bounty hunters!
yes too much joins the bounty especially on fb and twitter as well as on the signature so it's a little bit different in the coin because of too much bounty in the bounty but it's pretty good too many to blame because if you go badly know just got a good deal just bounty
I think it is hard to limit the participants because the allocation will be divided into the number of participants so there is nothing wrong with that especially the allocation is high. It is a sign that more and more people every day get acquainted with cryptocurrency. Bounty campaigns are becoming more and more involved. Projects that have good ideas and potential will attract investors to enter the cryptocurrency market. Many people join the bounty and I'm sure many of them invest in the ICO too.
I agree with you, today many people are interested in crypto currency, it's good or bad, it's hard to say, because the less people know, the more we have the profit, the more people know, we do our work better. 
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I am one of so many participants in bounty. Yes I admit that some of the bounty I joined are soany participants especially in facebook and twitter campaign and sometimes signature campaign also. In some cases even though there are so many participants some participants are not accepted or do not have stakes. I can't blame anyone why bounty has so many participants. They / we are accepted because we are qualified. Like me, what if they really need money too ?
I think it is hard to limit the participants because the allocation will be divided into the number of participants so there is nothing wrong with that especially the allocation is high. It is a sign that more and more people every day get acquainted with cryptocurrency. Bounty campaigns are becoming more and more involved. Projects that have good ideas and potential will attract investors to enter the cryptocurrency market. Many people join the bounty and I'm sure many of them invest in the ICO too.
There are to many participants but different choices they want to participate in a bounty campaigns. Facebook, Twitter, signature and even in translation campaign. They gives are more rewards so don't lose hope be part of all.
Its okay for me if the bounty participants in social was limiting only with almost 1000 or 2000 participant because the lesser participant the higher you chance to get profit,and as i know many people was using now dummy account to join in social so i think its unfair for us ,so now i was hoping for the good of many bounty hunters.
If you want to advertise in the whole world you have to need more participants. How can you grow if only few people working around you? I think you need more participants. In terms of reward you can earn the same maybe much better, so don't worry about new participants they do what you can not do.
Jump to: