Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 52. (Read 10495 times)
well, some ppl talk about it everywhere, they making their own blogs to popularise bounties, and i dunno why, what point to cut the tree on that you are sitting, not smart at all, but anyway we cant control it, so new ppl coming, some ppl stopping or started to trade etc.
I am very worried about this, usually when ico nearly finished many participants who joined using their account that has a high rank, I think this is very detrimental to the participants who follow the project from the beginning of ico that has low rank, sometimes tokens they get the same, I would like if all projects provide a deadline for registration for bounty so as not to overdo participants
Thats right mate many new participants are joining in the bounty campaigns but we cannot force the ico’s to be strict on it, and if thats the case thats too hard to implement because of there busyness and ico’s want is just to advertise and to have many investors to invest their projects so its okay not be strict in accepting more bounty hunters.
Bounty and too many participants make bounty project hard for bounty hunters to sign in and this even let the tokens so low when distributed
We still can earn though there are many participants who join bounty campaign because the allocations are talking about million of dollars and even if how many participant will share that bounty still it is good as a sideline or another source of income. But if you are focusing too much on the system and earn then definitely it will not be enough to sustain the cost of living. The good thing about the huge number of participants joining in bounty campaign is that it will make the ICO project to be more successful since there are many who are doing the campaign. This will make the ICO developer happier than before since the bounty reward is still the same and they could not increase it since it is already computed and allocated in their ICO project.
i think in coming future we will be seeing in more strict rules like increase in no. of followers, certain no. of tweets, account age etc which are becoming more of a trend nowadays in all bounty campaigns. if increase in good icos keeps on matching with increase in no. of bounty hunters i think there won't be much problem, plus still there is a lot of money that crypto has to offer.
For me this only indicates the legitimacy of a certain ICO, which tells that the more bounty participants the more legit project it has because many bounty hunters trust it. But it's not always the case, look at centra there are lots of lots of people believe on it to think that they've plan it's plot to deceieve the people from the very beginning. Though ctr pays thr bounty portion but they are charge into many fraudulent acts.
I think each person should do a calculation before registering that bounty. If you find that the campaign has many people regist, you should stop and select another project (for stakes projects only). That just helps you save time and help others make a profit. If the people behind the registration more and more, will only make each person in the campaign receive very little
I do that, but almost everywhere I see about 400+ participants in signature campaign and about 2000+ participants in Twitter campaign. 
I think each person should do a calculation before registering that bounty. If you find that the campaign has many people regist, you should stop and select another project (for stakes projects only). That just helps you save time and help others make a profit. If the people behind the registration more and more, will only make each person in the campaign receive very little
I think they have considered the sharing of bounty results, the more bounty ico participants are getting crowded and that's good, nothing is set up anymore...
My main thought, that we need to confess - bounties will not cap the participants, the more people - the better advertisement they get
There are already bounty companies that limit the number of participants and the rank of participants. I advise you to participate in such bounty.
Most likely Bounty programs will limit the number of participants in certain campaigns. The main thing is not just to fixate on Twitter and Facebook, well, learn to write posts and translate
There are already bounty companies that limit the number of participants and the rank of participants. I advise you to participate in such bounty.
Actually if you look closely on popular campaigns and campaigns that are managed by known profiles, you'll notice that they are really picky on who can join on their campaign. It is almost like impossible to find a decent campaign and have it not have many participants because of the good profit that it proposes. If you think that campaigns are not regulated well enough then I think do your research like read carefully their bounty announcements.
I agree with you, most of the campaigns that are managed by experienced managers have a way of selecting high rewarding campaigns and scrutinize the participants to ensure quality bounty activities.
Yes, I agree. Most bounty campaign are composed of legit and experienced development team members are the great chances that will pay high rewards at the end of the ICO. But payments will totally matter the numbers of participants who joined the campaign. The greater the number of the participants who participated the less the reward that is being distributed depending by each ranks stated points.
Really? i have not noticed so far. the bounty campaign that i am currently in is almost empty. but as i just read, it is not empty everywhere. apparently some bounty campaigns are overrun and others are nearly empty.
That may be because the bounty campaign in which you are participating is a bad one and is likely to offer you some worthless tokens in the end. You don't need to be mad at me, as I was just listing out a possibility. But it will be wrong to say that the bounty campaigns are not witnessing a swell in the number of participants.
My opinion is that this is simply a complete lack of forethought by bounty managers and project teams. Sometimes I write serious, good quality articles, but only for campaigns that aren't flooded with too many shit articles diluting the stakes. As you can guess, I rarely write articles. If I see max stakes awarded to some 300 word foreign language post on SteemIt, you can be assured I'm not promoting that ICO. They can keep that content, and best of luck to them with it.
Bounties that don't limit participants will only attract the worst sorts. And at the moment this is most bounties. And at the moment most ICOs fail to reach their soft cap. See the pattern here? The real issue is a complete lack of professionalization within the ICO based cryptocommunity at the moment.
Bounties that don't limit participants will only attract the worst sorts. And at the moment this is most bounties. And at the moment most ICOs fail to reach their soft cap. See the pattern here? The real issue is a complete lack of professionalization within the ICO based cryptocommunity at the moment.
Really? i have not noticed so far. the bounty campaign that i am currently in is almost empty. but as i just read, it is not empty everywhere. apparently some bounty campaigns are overrun and others are nearly empty.
Actually if you look closely on popular campaigns and campaigns that are managed by known profiles, you'll notice that they are really picky on who can join on their campaign. It is almost like impossible to find a decent campaign and have it not have many participants because of the good profit that it proposes. If you think that campaigns are not regulated well enough then I think do your research like read carefully their bounty announcements.
I agree with you, most of the campaigns that are managed by experienced managers have a way of selecting high rewarding campaigns and scrutinize the participants to ensure quality bounty activities.
Actually if you look closely on popular campaigns and campaigns that are managed by known profiles, you'll notice that they are really picky on who can join on their campaign. It is almost like impossible to find a decent campaign and have it not have many participants because of the good profit that it proposes. If you think that campaigns are not regulated well enough then I think do your research like read carefully their bounty announcements.
I agree with you, most of the campaigns that are managed by experienced managers have a way of selecting high rewarding campaigns and scrutinize the participants to ensure quality bounty activities.
Actually if you look closely on popular campaigns and campaigns that are managed by known profiles, you'll notice that they are really picky on who can join on their campaign. It is almost like impossible to find a decent campaign and have it not have many participants because of the good profit that it proposes. If you think that campaigns are not regulated well enough then I think do your research like read carefully their bounty announcements.
Jump to: