Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 96. (Read 10495 times)
I think that a large number of participants don't harm bounty campaigns but it harms bounty participants because the reward becomes smaller and if you wanna earn more money you must participate in numerous of bounty campaigns, that will lead to problems with twitter or facebook accounts, linked with suspicious activity. As for me, I think it’s worth imposing restrictions on the number of participants. I suppose it's the only way that can improve the existing situation.
In my personal opinion there's nothing wrong in what more participants joining bounty campaigns, because this is really easy money for so many people for not so hard work.
In my opinion I think all ICO's should limit the number of bounty participants but on the other side in one particular ICO its good for them to have many bounty participants to advertise their project and be more successful.Bounty campaigns is very much known nowadays which results to have many participants.
i think bounty campaign is very good,they can introduce product to everyone throught participants,it is the same marketing,but bounty is fix depend each ico so many ppl join campaign,each ppl get less coin
It is a way of promotion of their project and it's very true that there are too many participants out there,especially social media bounty hunter, this year, it feels like the reward from social media bounty is too little than before, i hope the only solution maybe just maybe for ICO project will raise the allocation of the reward so that people will get excited again to participate.
Nowadays , bounty campaigns recruiting very high number of participants . This means that budget is spreading over them and every new participant lowers income of every other participant . Because of that , most part of social media campaigns do not worth your time. I think bounty rules have to be reformatted , because the number of participants increasing day by day and soon it will make no sense to do bounties .
The question is obvious. People take part in the easiest parts of any bounty which are Facebook and Twitter, of course, there would be many people. Take a signature and you'll have no problems
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Many guys who just entered in the area of cryptocurrencies think that bounty campaigns is easy way to earn money. But this is temporary feeling. Most of these guys goes to some other activities, like mining for example.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Many guys who just entered in the area of cryptocurrencies think that bounty campaigns is easy way to earn money. But this is temporary feeling. Most of these guys goes to some other activities, like mining for example.
I think that now it's much more profitable to participate in media campaigns and signature if you want to get a good profit with bounty. Otherwise you've to choose a social bounty very carefully and do a lot of campaigns.
social media campaign become crowded because of social media campaign itself. many participants are promoting ICO using facebook and twitter. their friends see it so they get the interest of those people.
It is really normal that many people is supporting and participating on bounty campaigns, because there are too many bounty campaign right now, and a lot of people is also earning a good profit with bounty, and people like to participate on bounty because it is one a of th3 good way to have money.
There are a lot of new comers for the bounty programs and most of them start with facebook and twitter. I have no obligation new comers coming to field, but bounty managers should have a mechanism to limit the number of participants according to their requirements, otherwise nobody gets a reward for what they do.
It's sad to see that as many as participating in the bounty campaign are fewer than you can get. It's a good thing if you're small enough to make your heart grow after the bounty campaign. thanks ..
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
yeah, a lot of participants that's mean less rewards. i think every bounty manager should to add the new rules for a limit participant. especially for social media which i see always continue to grow.
As we already got many participants on Bounty and we recieve less pay. We cant really avoid it and putting some rules and choosing best participants are not good option since we cant hardly identify who is the best on promoting. We just need to find some good bounty the got high allocation so even so many participant we can still get more profit than others.
I agree. In other words some of the bounty campaign has declared a limit numbers of participants to participate the campaign. As long as the limit not yet full we cant avoid any bounty hunters to joined to. And besides each campaign were declared percentage allocation. The more the bounty hunters participated the campaign the more the ICO projects promoted and the great chances for a project would success even if we get lesser pay but at least successful and get paid.
Yes, there were a lot of participants, unfortunately. Therefore, I try to choose less popular managers than before. This is certainly a higher risk, but the reward will be greater!
Excellent strategy, in addition, you can choose those bounty managers who set limits on the number of participants.
It's difficult to find the best ICO or the best gift campaign today
because there are only a few people who can feel the best from others.
in my opinion it is better to share blessings to others,
we work hard in achieving higher rankings and learn how we can make a good profit in bounty campaign.
because there are only a few people who can feel the best from others.
in my opinion it is better to share blessings to others,
we work hard in achieving higher rankings and learn how we can make a good profit in bounty campaign.
As we already got many participants on Bounty and we recieve less pay. We cant really avoid it and putting some rules and choosing best participants are not good option since we cant hardly identify who is the best on promoting. We just need to find some good bounty the got high allocation so even so many participant we can still get more profit than others.
With the introduction of merit for beginners, it is difficult to raise their rating, so low payments, due to the large number of bounty participants, I believe that only affect Newbie and Jr. Member.
I don't know if you are right. Most of people participated in twitter and facebook bounties, maybe articles. But for me signature campaigns always will be profitable.
The work of Bounty is very good for the reward, but the risk is also very large, resulting in a lot of fraudulent ICO projects are running.
There are too many participants, but i don't think this is the main reason.
There are too many participants, but i don't think this is the main reason.
Jump to: