Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 99. (Read 10495 times)
Another great way to gain profit from bounties is to work in a places, where there is not so many people participating, like blog, reddit, medium, translations (if you can)
I agree that there are more bounty hunters, but the number of ISO also increases.
The problem is not in the number of the bounty, but in cheaters who take a large part of the pool with multi-accounts or steal articles, they use your nicknames to receive steaks in the subscription campaigns. The problem is in managers who consider steaks as horrible, or do not do it correctly (according to their own rules).
Also, not all developers indicate in the smart contracts conditions for the bounty of the campaign, which leads to fraud.
Part of the problem is solved through the introduction of the KYC, the audit of smart contracts, the limitation of the number of participants.
The problem is not in the number of the bounty, but in cheaters who take a large part of the pool with multi-accounts or steal articles, they use your nicknames to receive steaks in the subscription campaigns. The problem is in managers who consider steaks as horrible, or do not do it correctly (according to their own rules).
Also, not all developers indicate in the smart contracts conditions for the bounty of the campaign, which leads to fraud.
Part of the problem is solved through the introduction of the KYC, the audit of smart contracts, the limitation of the number of participants.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Well the issue is that many people want or would like to start crypto by earning coins for free. And one way of earning free coins without investing your money is bounties that is why there is this upsurge of bounty hunters. One thing we must note is that, though there are so many bounty participants there are also so many projects requiring the services of bounty hunters.What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Also, Many bounty managers have their own ways of preventing so many people from joining so that each participant can get enough coins. They sometimes put a limit to the number of people who can join a particular bounty campaign. Also as people are finding out that bounties are not lucrative as it was before, they'll move on and find something else to do. This is crypto man, there are so many ways to survive here with the so many different ways of earning.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Well, I think it is not a bad thing mate. The true purpose of bounty campaign is to spread words about the project and partially advertise it. The more people who do it the higher number of people could hear about it. This is why having more hunters is not a bad thing.
The more people involved in a campaign, the less money is being earned. Very popular campaigns are very slow to pay and you can take your money after months. The amount of stake that you will also receive is also very low
The fact is that there are so many bounty programs now that the number of participants can be doubled. And even after that in Ukraine it will be favorable to be engaged in it.
What do you mean by bounty regulations, if you feel bounty participants are increasing daily and you are no earning good profit from your company, them you should concentrate on other bounties and let go off twitter and facebook campaign. Always check spreadsheet first before registering for any compaign.
I am also confused what regulation your mean. What does it mean to limit participants for bounty campaign especially for facebook and twitter? Because both bounty is the most participants. I agree with you, if you feel bounty campaign participants too much and you will not get much profit, then leave it and looking for another bounty. In this forum every time a lot of new bounty popping up, you just need to find what you think will give a lot of profit. I have no problem with many participants because all the members in this forum have the same rights to follow bounty like facebook and twitter as much as they can. 
It is true, but the campaign manager or the escrow need to have enough budget to sustain the campaign. Before the bounty begins, you need to have enough financial needs to gain a lot of advertisement for your token. This would also help bounties to gain more investor, can seek a lot of participants for their token
Any regulation set for bounty needs to be done very carefully so that it is not unfair to anyone, whether that is existing bounty hunters or participants who want to start bounty. We must remember that a lot of the people who join bounty, do so because they dont have much money to invest. This is a good opportunity for us to gain tokens which we can later trade to hopefully make profit.
I hope also that they would have a regulation regarding the campaigns. and hopefully they would limit the participants so that we could get higher stakes. but i guess their main target is to campaign the project, thats why they are trying to get a lot of bounty participants as possible.
I think it is necessary to regulate later the participation of those who joined the generosity of the company. And still need to actively engage in multicounts and bots.
What do you mean by bounty regulations, if you feel bounty participants are increasing daily and you are no earning good profit from your company, them you should concentrate on other bounties and let go off twitter and facebook campaign. Always check spreadsheet first before registering for any compaign.
I think that is actually the point of bounty and signature campaigns you know, to actually get as much people invested in the project as possible so that is why there are so many more bounty participants, the more bounty participants, the more people being reached.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Bounty campaign is very helpful for every people because you can work at home and earn cryptocurrency which you can trade in the market or just hold it in order to earn more profit in the future, ico's today are business that will make the economy of every country to improve even more.
I also think that bounty managers should limit the number of participants so that everyone can earn)))
As a token issuer, proper promotion and promotion are necessary, and almost all bounties have clear rules and restrictions on the bounty pool, generally 1%-3%. It will don't affect the interests of other participants, and many bounties have their harsh conditions for joining, not everyone can participate, so I think your worry is redundant.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I beg to disagree its not Fair if we just choose people to join the Any of Bounty Works ( it must set the limit of participants or a First come first serve basis and this power is in the hand of Bounty manager (BM) should Include that in the Bounty Thread Announcement?
I dont think thats a bad thing. It increases the likelihood of reaching more people and getting more people involved in crypto.
There is no need to expect a big reward, the main thing is to help the project collect the necessary amount of money to develop its idea. In the market of cryptocurrency all is interconnected and the success of one ICO will positively affect the entire market as a whole.
Well more and more who follow the bounty campaign, because no need to spend capital. but it is not easy also because we have to be diligent to find other profitable projects, we can not rely on one project, but no problem it just takes hard work.
Jump to: