Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 98. (Read 10495 times)
You need to consider how many people will be applying for the bounty before applying, particularly if you are looking to compete in a highly competitive part such as the signature or twitter campaign, as there are usually the most applicants here all fighting over the same token allocation. For you, it is best to apply to the part of the campaign that has the highest effort to reward ratio, so check the spreadsheets first to see what the competition is like.
About the bounty finds out more and more people this is more often recognized as a word of mouth and the more participants the less we get the percentage of generosity distribution.
while wont them be many,,,many people are looking for the way of becoming rich without creating any of their own ideas,,bounty has really help alot of people,,but the problem is people do much in their campaign
Bounty campaigns have become popular and have gain a lot of attention lately resulting to the rise of bounty hunters. I think this rise of many participants is a good thing and is a healthy competition. Those who are afraid or annoyed with the increase of participants are either worried about somebody taking their jobs. Even the real world their is a lot of competition, if you are not quite good or a slacker then someone is willing to take your place.
Yes everywhere you go competition is always there, even here in crypto platform. But it should not be bounty hunters that will compete against each other, but alts with more or less similar products.
With more participants in the bounty campaign things should get better, rather than ugly.
It only means it has a lot of community supporters that back it up and promotes it.
Everybody wants to do bounties and thus making the participants many.
If the dev/admin can make the rules and regulations strictly, also give out the maximum and minimum number of participants, this will limit the number of people joining a bounty campaigns.
If the dev/admin can make the rules and regulations strictly, also give out the maximum and minimum number of participants, this will limit the number of people joining a bounty campaigns.
Many participants in the bonus campaign also showed that the project was of great interest. Initially we can say that the project was successful.
There are some who see the money from the bonus campaign is too small they will no longer be interested in it. But today more and more people are learning and learning about the cryptographic market, the bonus campaign is the first thing that stimulates them to participate. Therefore, the number of people participating in the campaign is always much inevitable.
There are some who see the money from the bonus campaign is too small they will no longer be interested in it. But today more and more people are learning and learning about the cryptographic market, the bonus campaign is the first thing that stimulates them to participate. Therefore, the number of people participating in the campaign is always much inevitable.
Some bounty campaign limit they user amount to join. This would be the best way to get out a lot of money from a bounty. But that is not in favor of the bounty managers or the ICO company. The more people join the bounties, the more attention their get for their ICO.
Not everyone is good at many participants, the market will be at a rally and at all bounties will not suffice
of course the rules should be stricter to keep only the best hunters) I think the requirements have become more complex, prahallada the quality of articles and followers of blogs /channels, it's probably right...
I think it's okay. More people participants, project will more and more popular. They can hit softcap and hardcap, only then will they pay us. Last year, when bounty not generality, they can also run ads in social network to attract investors. But until now, social network will ban ICO's ads because a lot of scam happened. They will need human resources to advertise, and who? Yes, us. So i think they will pay us the right amount to advertise their project
many participants lead to the distribution of more and more people, resulting in more and more income, if the number of participants is more. If there are too many participants, look for another person who is still a small number of participants.
It is better to have more participants in bounty campaigns to spread better the project so that it will be known by the others and many investors will attract to this to make it successful.
Bounty campaigns have become popular and have gain a lot of attention lately resulting to the rise of bounty hunters. I think this rise of many participants is a good thing and is a healthy competition. Those who are afraid or annoyed with the increase of participants are either worried about somebody taking their jobs. Even the real world their is a lot of competition, if you are not quite good or a slacker then someone is willing to take your place.
many already know that bounties are rewarded with tokens, and you do not need to make any investments, and tokens can then increase many times, and you will again profit by reselling them at a price. Of course, this is an attractive way to make a profit, and I'm not surprised that people forget about simple investments.
It is not rightful if huge participants can participate in the campaign with such low token allocation for the whole campaign. For example you work for 2months then after you got only 100 token. Wtf, project is that! They want to get more bounty hunters but they are not willing to give more to bounty hunters to make them happy by the payment and with the project. I think those manager have the full authority for it is under their management.
Having a lot if participants in every bounties is not a big deal because it's a big help for the project because they help the ICO to become successful in order to have the profit for each participants.
i think its not change to much but if you have high rank, and i think too many participants its just make too many spamers its critical, this forum is created for sharing information not for bounty and i think in here because bounty this forum changes function to bounty not for sharing
I think it's alright to have a lot of participants because we see that having a lot of participants is the first target for the project so they will support the project in the first place.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
For me, you have a point there but I can see that there's nothing wrong of there's a lot of participants it means there's a lot of people who can spread about the project then the budget will increase more so there's really nothing wrong. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
In my personal opinion there's nothing wrong in what more participants joining bounty campaigns, because this is really easy money for so many people for not so hard work.
Jump to: