Topic: bounty hunter paid USDT? - page 20. (Read 60789 times)
That's not going to happen. Creators of coins are not willing to give actual money for advertising. Most creators just tend to share what they created which doesn't cost anything at the start because this is not costing them any money but instead gaining more.
A good idea than bounty hunters gets a lot of promises but in terms of reality they don't get what they should get. in terms of their estimation they suffered considerable losses
I think it's a good thing that payments with USDT are more profitable for bounty hunters to be balanced with what they have done. It is also good to avoid the decline in token prices, which are mostly done by bounty hunters themselves
The tokens they release have no value for them, the main task of the project is to collect USDT, they will never share their money with bounty hunters. That idea is very good but not realizable.
you are right,some people will really like this idea because they get paid right away but it will be very difficult to realize, because not everyone will approve it, especially investors.
i also don't really like the idea, because these tokens can be more expensive than we imagined.
I totally agree, last month I got a bounty payment and i get USDT i got it from a bounty campaign called Probit project . I think it's a good project and they also appreciate bounty hunters by paying according to the allocation and also on time.
If there was a payment, I would certainly agree, but it seems to me that investors would react negatively to this and this would also have a bad effect on the token!
It seems like you can't even understand about how it Works. that will not be totally giving any effect to the token's price. In fact that will give a stable condition to the token and prevent the dump caused by they are liquidating their Money on the huge volumes.
If there was a payment, I would certainly agree, but it seems to me that investors would react negatively to this and this would also have a bad effect on the token!
It'll be very good if bounty hunters received payment in USDT. But in fact no company willing to do that, bounty payment pool is a little high and if payment in USDT, company have less funds to do other activities. My idea, an able idea, is bounty hunters will be paid 40% in USDT and 60% in token. To ensure bounty hunter works.
do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
If we are paid by USDT, it will be a disadvantage for them. because the price of the token will never be true when it is listed on the exchange. ICO prices are virtual and it will be reduced more than you imagine. Project owners will let us suffer and they will not want to spend more than they have for us.the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
If we are paid by USDT, it will be a disadvantage for them. because the price of the token will never be true when it is listed on the exchange. ICO prices are virtual and it will be reduced more than you imagine. Project owners will let us suffer and they will not want to spend more than they have for us. the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
The tokens they release have no value for them, the main task of the project is to collect USDT, they will never share their money with bounty hunters. That idea is very good but not realizable.
I am agree to bounty payment in Tether (USDT) but you think really it's possible? Project development how make payment in USDT for bounty hunters. Dev must be need to spend ico fund because there are no others way for USDT payment. Bounty hunter play big important role to increasing coin value or ratio. This is to difficult for project management because they normally offering token in ico rate.
do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
USDT has constant value. So it will be the best payment system for any bounty hunter. Bounty hunter really work very hard but they get token as a reward. Token reward maximum time valueless or low values. So USDT will best choice for payment of bounty hunters.
It will be nice for bounty hunters because they will not have to wait for the token to be listed and they will get the required amount due them but on the part of the Developers it will be like a waste , it will be rather good they pay you in their tokens
The idea seems to me very cool, because we can only dream of such stability and there would be no escape with tokens, but it still does not work and will not, because none of the developers would agree.
I agree, it is more profitable for developers to pay in tokens, of course there are rarely projects that pay in bitcoins or Ethereum , but there are very few of them 
it would be great but I think this is not probable because most of ICO haven't enough funds before ICO and using their tokens is more convenient for them.
I agree that but I don't think they want to pay bounty hunter with USDT. They think USDT still worth it than their tokens so that they will give the tokens than the USDT. But if they want to get the trust from the bounty hunters and the investor, they should do this, and the dev needs to allocate some money to them. Or maybe, the dev can pay by two types, one is for USDT and the second is for their tokens, and I think it acceptable by bounty hunters.
Do you really think those project developers will actually be willing to spend real money to buy USDT and pay their bounty hunters? You may profit from it, but its not going to be a "profitable" way for the project developers. Don't you think its better for them to pay you in their own currency/coin/token since they will not have to spend a single cent? Moreover, they will want users to use their tokens, so it makes sense to them to pay you in their own token.
It seems to me that no matter what tokens will be paid for the work of bounty hunters, USDT or Bitcoin or Ethereum, the most important thing is that the ICO project really works. The problem is that the public tokensale system through ICO has undermined investor confidence. In my opinion, since the second half of 2018, most of these projects can not build soft-cap. As a result, the work of bounty hunters remains unpaid.
The idea seems to me very cool, because we can only dream of such stability and there would be no escape with tokens, but it still does not work and will not, because none of the developers would agree.
Jump to: