Topic: bounty hunter paid USDT? - page 16. (Read 60774 times)
As a bounty hunter, it's certainly nice to pay with USDT, but investors and developers might disagree and this is the same as promoting USDT, not the product offered.
do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
I agree on that terms, because we are experiencing only altcoins receive in bounty hunting with no value at all. But if we receive dollars, we can surely manage to exchange that with our labor of advertising. the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
I support the idea that bounty participants should be paid with USDT because most at times the coins get depreciated when they get to the market so hunters end up receiving lesser than what was promised during the campaign.
It's silly. If you want someone to pay you stable dollars than go get a job and stop dream about something like that. I get it, you just want to be rich doing actually nothing.
Am very sure you are doing something when it comes down to bounty hunting the only problem i doubt is upto the point that guarantee you USDT payment while they have their tokens to pay you There are bounties that do actually pay with ETH or BTC but you will have to do the extra work and put in the effort 
The best solution that would lead to a win-win scenario. Bounty hunters will finally get a legit payment method and the projects won't let their token to be dumped on exchanges. What could be better for both sides?
If you wondering about win-win scenario than what do you think about 50% of payment paid in USDT and 50% of payment paid in tokens? Maybe that will be the best option for the both sides?
The best solution that would lead to a win-win scenario. Bounty hunters will finally get a legit payment method and the projects won't let their token to be dumped on exchanges. What could be better for both sides?
It seems to me that this would be a very cool idea if it would turn into reality, but everyone understands that most likely this will not happen, so it makes no sense to talk about it yet. That's it.
do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
I agree with that, but you must to know that will give bad impact to project, because they must buy USDT first, he must set aside special funds to pay bounty hunter, so what about if allocation for bounty hunter $1M?? Dev and team must pay $1M in USDT and they only raise $2M in token sale, that's means half collected funds for bounty hunter, that's bullshit. That's why the team open bounty program and give us their token equivalent $1M, that's doesnt matter because only take from the total supply not from aside funds the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
I believe that such a payment system is much more reasonable and protects the token rate after entering the exchange.
do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
I agree if there are payments in USD. But that is rarely done by bounty campaigns because the basis is crypto so coins are better than USD. I also don't know the bad about investors, but it remains the same because the coins are also worth USD.
I agree with that idea, but maybe the bounty is not only marketing ICO tokens but ICO is also building communities and transactions in their token trading.
I have never heard about the payment for Bounty hunters in USDT. In my opinion, this may happen, however, it will depend on each program that holds the project. It will be good for the bounty hunters to receive it. But of course, only few projects that may give them because they will also introduce more tokens for the bounty hunters by giving them their ICO tokens.
This is good idea that they paid us by US for us not to wait so long we working nice and we following their rules but we are waiting so long but some of the project they didn't paid us. But this is impossible also because they are promoting their coins so that they are paying us by their coins.
do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
It is not good for the funds management/creation from the project side. You have to share funds from your crowdfunding campaign and pay/focus time on managing it. Creating some amount of tokens for bounty campaign really pushed promotion of the project with very low costs or even sometimes near to zero costs. So, it is really hard to create a bounty campaign paid in USDT from team and project side. the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
I recently participated in a bounty campaign which paid in USDT and I have to admit that it was one of the best campaigns I have participated in till date, price if the token doesn't change so I got my full value in USDT, I loved it very much
That's interesting. And what is the project? I have not heard about such projects yet. If this is true and it works fine, then it is worth participating in the bounty companies of these projects. do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
I like the idea because it will be an advantage for all the bounty hunters as they will surely get paid with the time and effort they exerted for their participation with the project but I don't think this will be the case because it might endanger the whole project itself due to what's happening right now with the market where the value of token gets easily dump when it reach the exchange.
do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
I will prefer being paid in USDT instead of the ICO tokens. Also, it will do the project better and the real investors better as there will be no dumping of such by the bounty hunters immediately after listing. the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
It's silly. If you want someone to pay you stable dollars than go get a job and stop dream about something like that. I get it, you just want to be rich doing actually nothing.
I faced it once with probit bounty, but I was lazy to participate in that bounty, because pool was small and there wasn't signature bounty. So I missed it and as far as I know payout was enough and all of hunters were happy to paricipate
It will be a great experience to get bounty token in USDT! This can be possible if a legit project agreed with it. Investors and projects owner always blame bounty hunters for the coin dumping price, though they are wrong about it. but still, they can pay bounty hunters in ETH, BTC or USDT to avoid the dump! But I don't think this will happen early. If the STO era comes then we can see it.
Jump to: