Bounty hunters killed ICO? - page 6.

suvo05

sr. member

Activity: 1162

Merit: 260

Quote from: dtb.agency on August 13, 2019, 11:15:15 AM

1) a project collected funds,
2) Funds allocation (among advisors, bla bla bla and bounty hunters)
3) Considering there are thousands of BH, the price of a token dropped dramatically
4) Investors bought token on ICO see this crap and less people invest in ICOs.

True or False?

Bounty hunters get only 2-5% of the total token allocation. And not all of them instantly sell all their bounty as soon as they get token but contrarily some of them hold the coin longer than the usual investor. As a normal investor invest money they have a limit which they can't afford to lose but some bounty hunters can afford to hold it for longer. So it's a complete false alligation.

iv4n

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1191

Quote from: Layers318 on August 29, 2019, 10:47:19 PM

Bounty hunters are not to blame when it comes to the down trend of ICOs. ICO killed itself because of its loose structures and methods of executing its sales. Due to the loose structures in ICOs, scam projects could easily penetrate because there were no checks on teams and projects. IEO took over because it restructured the method of token sales by hosting them on exchange platform. With the top exchanges, before an IEO is hosted, checks are made on the project to ascertain its authenticity.

Team behind the project is to blame, that`s for sure. Bounty hunters get just small part of the tokens, they can affect the ICO, but in so small scale. Team that has the most of the tokens, private sales they organize with huge bonuses for big early investor, it`s normal to believe that they are behind everything.
Bad structure, bad plan and realization leads to death of ICO, and any other startup. IEO is taking over cause exchanges are vouching for startups, but I don`t believe in their words, I like to check project by myself before I make any move.

b1boy

jr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 2

On the off chance that bounty hunters typically get 1%out of entire token course, some portion of them chooses to hold, at that point by what means can the rest figure out how to drop cost? Extraordinarily when every one of them dont sell their bounty tokens simultaneously.

Layers318

jr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 4

CurioInvest [IEO Live]

Bounty hunters are not to blame when it comes to the down trend of ICOs. ICO killed itself because of its loose structures and methods of executing its sales. Due to the loose structures in ICOs, scam projects could easily penetrate because there were no checks on teams and projects. IEO took over because it restructured the method of token sales by hosting them on exchange platform. With the top exchanges, before an IEO is hosted, checks are made on the project to ascertain its authenticity.

mamahdedeh

full member

Activity: 812

Merit: 100

www.cd3d.app

Quote from: fosco333 on August 29, 2019, 08:44:39 PM

Quote from: dtb.agency on August 13, 2019, 11:15:15 AM

1) a project collected funds,
2) Funds allocation (among advisors, bla bla bla and bounty hunters)
3) Considering there are thousands of BH, the price of a token dropped dramatically
4) Investors bought token on ICO see this crap and less people invest in ICOs.

True or False?

This is mostly not true. It is true that if the bounty allocation too high, it can damage the price of the token later.
But usually the bounty allocation nowadays is very small if you compare with bounties in the past.
The dev who own the token or private investors without lock period could contribute the dump.

campaign prizes have always had a small percentage of earned token sales. if it's because of the bounty hunter, the team should be able to anticipate it, because there were many ICO projects in the past, so there is a lot of experience that can be used as a lesson. I think if the bounty hunter kills ICO, it means that the strength is very big of the bounty hunter on a project

llecrf

jr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 1

The allocation of tokens from each bounty is different and if the price of the token goes down it will not affect the new ico project, because I have joined and bought altcoin at ICO but project developers sometimes do not carry out their plans due to market situation and some negative information on crypto that makes prices other tokens and altcoin down

fosco333

full member

Activity: 1260

Merit: 100

Quote from: dtb.agency on August 13, 2019, 11:15:15 AM

1) a project collected funds,
2) Funds allocation (among advisors, bla bla bla and bounty hunters)
3) Considering there are thousands of BH, the price of a token dropped dramatically
4) Investors bought token on ICO see this crap and less people invest in ICOs.

True or False?

This is mostly not true. It is true that if the bounty allocation too high, it can damage the price of the token later.
But usually the bounty allocation nowadays is very small if you compare with bounties in the past.
The dev who own the token or private investors without lock period could contribute the dump.

Miklight88

copper member

Activity: 238

Merit: 1

GDZKVBV3L3JU5TFDBWMUMPZAHD3OSM2I3TAJRWPG7KU5U4UZCI

I never see any way that bounty hunters used to kill ico or any new project that is coming up , as regard the allocation to bounty hunters which many thought is the reason for the dump in price but to me , it is a capital no , as many project are after money and go to a very high risk by giving out bonus to private investor with like 500% gain and you expect such people not to dump it even if its 100% gain why bounty only get 1-3% ,will that affect the price?.

asyakashi

sr. member

Activity: 1918

Merit: 256

Just.bet - Decentralized On-chain Casino

Quote from: PuertoLibre on August 26, 2019, 06:13:11 PM

Quote from: asyakashi on August 26, 2019, 06:03:29 PM

Quote from: rich93 on August 25, 2019, 03:25:17 PM

Personally, my opinion is that it wasn't the bounty hunters who killed ICO, but a lot of crooks in these ICO projects.

I agree with you, why is the bounty hunter always a suspect for falling ICO prices. Bounty Hunter helps promote tokens and they are not the cause of death of ICO.
this is wrong and not objective assessment.

I have seen strong arguments which pointed towards the bounty hunters in this kind of discussions. The bounty rewards are dumped by the bounty hunters after the getting listed on any exchange. There is nothing wrong to sell the tokens that received to your wallet by airdrop or the bounty campaign. The cause of the down price is usually linked to the dumped tokens by the bounty hunters. They usually only care to get their BTC with dumping as fast as possible on the first available market orders.

not all bounty hunters throw away their tokens when the market opens. sometimes they also wait for the right price to sell, they read the roadmap and wait for good announcements from the project community.
I'm saying a small part of them.

abi1988

full member

Activity: 938

Merit: 100

Quote from: xmonkeyx on August 27, 2019, 01:26:02 AM

Bounty hunters are not ICO killers. Bounty hunters are often killed by ICO. I disagree with you about this.
Bounty hunters play an important role in the success of ICO projects, so it is very unlikely that ICOs will be killed by bounty hunters. Thanks.

Right, because what we often see is that the hunters are always victims of the ICO, one of which is when the ICO project does not pay the hunters, if this happens, then the hunters are automatically harmed, and in this case those killed are the ico hunter.

Christinebeauty

copper member

Activity: 420

Merit: 2

I believe the core mandate of every bounty program is to promote a particular project and attract investors into it. How can these same people be enemies of the project. Most bounty hunters are also investors so if your project or tokens are worth holding, no hunter will dump them. They should focus on their project development and stop blaming hunters

Tylev

full member

Activity: 854

Merit: 104

It is foolish to blame bounty hunters for ICO team failures. Most likely, these ICO teams slowly and gradually beat off any desire to participate in ICO bounty campaigns as bounty hunters. In fact, we are engaged in advertising the ICO project and for our work we get their tokens, which are even very difficult to call money, because they often do not get that way.

Recently, however, so many additional responsibilities have been imposed on us that it is time to enroll bounty hunters on the team. In addition, recently in some telegrams it has been expressly stated that they deliberately change the conditions for payment of earned tokens and if someone does not follow their correspondence for several weeks and does not fulfill the new conditions, then he will lose the right to earn tokens.

In conditions when the payment is delayed for many months, we are forced to participate in other projects and the overt intention of ICO teams to deceive us creates additional conflict situations that do not benefit this type of activity.

xmonkeyx

member

Activity: 658

Merit: 11

CRYPTO WEB3 NEOBANK

Bounty hunters are not ICO killers. Bounty hunters are often killed by ICO. I disagree with you about this.
Bounty hunters play an important role in the success of ICO projects, so it is very unlikely that ICOs will be killed by bounty hunters. Thanks.

Annexia

jr. member

Activity: 42

Merit: 2

This is absolutely false. Most ICOs don't even pay Bounty Hunters before their listing. They prefer to pay hunters months, even year after listing putting the investors into consideration. How then is it possible for BH to dump price.

antsam

full member

Activity: 2044

Merit: 109

I do not agree if Bounty Hunter is said to be the cause because only about 2% of the total tokens are part of the bounty hunter and not all sell their tokens directly when the market is available.
Many cases have occurred after the ICO prices dropped even though the tokens for bounty hunters have not been distributed.
There is also the case of an advisor directly selling all of his tokens when the market is available so prices are destroyed, so the solution is the key token for advisors and teams for 3 years.
There is also a very large bonus that is distributed both during pre-ICO or at ICO, sometimes the bonus is up to 100% and it is very crazy, if you want to give a bonus it is quite a maximum of 20%.
So Bounty Hunter is only workers who give their time to want high wages for their work

p2pclub

jr. member

Activity: 77

Merit: 1

I agree with the OP. Too many bounty hunters wanna fake their followers, then they get money and disapear. They did nothing useful, just cheaters.

So, what's the viewpoint here?? Please make your profile good responce by followers. We are all selling something, guys. So, at least have the real community for the ICO's owner. Don't let they give money for nothing.

patz22

full member

Activity: 1176

Merit: 104

Do you really think that bounty hunters can do that? Well, maybe if the team will give a lot but you know it is only a small amount of percentage is allocated to bounty hunters so it will only be a matter of days or even hours if it will cause dump. Do not blame promoters and you know what. I am a bounty hunter and mostly, I will invest to it as well depending on the project. So if I invested time and money so why should I dump it? Make sense?

adekogbe

member

Activity: 854

Merit: 21

This is one of the biggest misconceptions against bounty hunters in the cryptocurrency world.
Projects and investors are always quick to blame bounty hunters but i don't accept that bounty hunters ought to be the one to be fault.

The project team also takes part of the blame, because the cost of that specific coin will drop after the open since I have watched for commonly that even the bounty token was not discharge yet.

This is often because of the excess bonus giving out during the token sale

PuertoLibre

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1003

Quote from: asyakashi on August 26, 2019, 06:03:29 PM

Quote from: rich93 on August 25, 2019, 03:25:17 PM

Personally, my opinion is that it wasn't the bounty hunters who killed ICO, but a lot of crooks in these ICO projects.

I agree with you, why is the bounty hunter always a suspect for falling ICO prices. Bounty Hunter helps promote tokens and they are not the cause of death of ICO.
this is wrong and not objective assessment.

I have seen strong arguments which pointed towards the bounty hunters in this kind of discussions. The bounty rewards are dumped by the bounty hunters after the getting listed on any exchange. There is nothing wrong to sell the tokens that received to your wallet by airdrop or the bounty campaign. The cause of the down price is usually linked to the dumped tokens by the bounty hunters. They usually only care to get their BTC with dumping as fast as possible on the first available market orders.

asyakashi

sr. member

Activity: 1918

Merit: 256

Just.bet - Decentralized On-chain Casino

Quote from: rich93 on August 25, 2019, 03:25:17 PM

Personally, my opinion is that it wasn't the bounty hunters who killed ICO, but a lot of crooks in these ICO projects.

I agree with you, why is the bounty hunter always a suspect for falling ICO prices. Bounty Hunter helps promote tokens and they are not the cause of death of ICO.
this is wrong and not objective assessment.

Topic: Bounty hunters killed ICO? - page 6. (Read 7092 times)