Topic: Bounty hunters should be paid in ETH - page 29. (Read 4586 times)
I also like the idea of paying in the Ethereum, then the bounty hunters will not affect the price movement of the coin, and the market will be more stable.
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
Payments to bounty companies in ETH are already practiced. One of such projects that I heard is Daostak. I believe that it is really convenient for bounty participants, but I do not know how this affects the project.1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
if bounty hunter is paid by ETH, project's coin will be hard to circule in markets, maybe just investor and trader have that coin
For us it is not so profitable. Some new tokens can give as X-multiplication in comparison with ETH. For the team it is risk warranty in case of failure.
Why do developers do this? If ico enters institutional funds, for example, in the number of 5 pieces. And completely close the sale. All bounty hunters will be rewarded on ETH. Then the liquidity of this coin will be 0.
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
I agree with you, because I think if payment using ETH then it will not harm any parties, both for investors and dev from ICO.
I think it can never happen, it's because from the developers also want to build a solid community, if they pay the bounty hunter with ethereum then their tokens will never go up and I think it would be better for the bounty hunter to be paid token, because we will never know what the price of the tokens will be, for the long term
The idea has the right to life,I even saw a few such projects from paying airtime to the participants of the bounty.But still it is strange to give Ethereum, and not their tokens, do not still want to sell them immediately, it can be an analogue of buying.
Someday we will see more bounties like this because on jinbi bounty that i participated they will pay half ETH and HALF token when the campaign is finish i hope someone follow their footsteps.
It would be great for bounty hunters but i dont think that projects will pay in ethereum. Because there will be no point in selling their own tokens.
It would be just great to be rewarded for the bounty campaign in Ethereum. But then the meaning of the bounty campaign is lost - it turns out you are promoting their tokens and do not want to receive them?
I think it would be nice if bounty hunters can be paid in ether. It is even better there will be no more dump of the coin in the market that cause the price of the coin to drop below the ICO price
You know this interesting proposal, get paid for participating in bounty companies in ETH. In this case, ETH itself will get a good boost to growth. But there is another side. Yes, tokens recently traded below the ICO price and often go to the bottom, which in turn upsets all participants, but at the same time there is a chance of getting many X's and it's tempting to get tokens and not ETH becomes bigger. I already met bounty when instead of tokens it was offered to get ETH and I liked it. I think that it is just necessary to give such an opportunity to choose what to receive a reward. This will be the best solution.
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
brilliant thinking, I strongly agree with what you say if bounty hunter in pay with ETH then the investors will not be afraid of coin dump price after all bounty participants in pay and this step may be more attract investors to invest1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
I do not think paying Ethereum is a better option.
Since most of the time if I participate in this potential project, it means that I'm optimistic about this ICO project, so I'd rather get a token instead of Ethereum.
Since most of the time if I participate in this potential project, it means that I'm optimistic about this ICO project, so I'd rather get a token instead of Ethereum.
I think that the participants of the bounty campaigns should be awarded in ICO's tokens because they choose this project, invest time in it so they have to believe in these projects and in its tokens.
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
brilliant thinking, I strongly agree with what you say if bounty hunter in pay with ETH then the investors will not be afraid of coin dump price after all bounty participants in pay and this step may be more attract investors to invest 1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
It might be good idea but you missing the point of whole thing. They pay in the Tokens because they kind of get security deposit in their hands. When the funds are raised then the value for each token is decided. When bounty participant are allocated with the token then that much % of tokens are circuited right away and thus helps the micro economy of the ICO itself. This can have positive effects on the token value for later times. If they pay directly in the ETH then nothing like that will really happen with the ICO and thus token may not get the value at all.
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
Payments to bounty companies in ETH are already practiced. One of such projects that I heard is Daostak. I believe that it is really convenient for bounty participants, but I do not know how this affects the project. 1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
I've seen only one campaign that paid their participants in ETH - Daostack. And that was because they didn't manage to keep the price of their token on the acceptable level (maybe because of ill-structured advertising campaign).1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
At the same time, token price fall is a huge problem to all bounty hunters - most of them rely on tokens making x2-3-4-5, etc. after the ICO, but in fact only few projects can show this result.
So yes, I would suggest the scheme that would allow the bounty participants to choose one of the options - either to be paid in tokens or in ETH.
This is a very good suggestion. IMO, 90% of the reward should be in the form of token, and the remaining 10% should be in the form of ETH. This will help the participants to get some sort of return for their efforts.
It could be better if in the beginning there is a choice whether the partcipant want to be paid in eth or tokens. Therefore, it will depends on each participants to make the decisions. And the payment could be at the end of the bounty program or after the token sale end.
Jump to: