Pages:
Author

Topic: Bounty Hunters the cause of token dumping ? (Read 18964 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 354
Often volumes are very low for new coins, which means that although bounty hunters cause the price to drop, the order book is very thin, so the price you see on the exchange isn't really the true price as you wouldn't be able to buy a larger number of tokens without making the price increase considerably.
jr. member
Activity: 259
Merit: 2
Sometimes, they dump, sometimes they hold.
I think a lot of experienced bounty hunters after promoting projects long enough usually go with their guts on what is worth keeping and what should be done away with.
I've met a bounty hunter who purchases more of any coin with a viable use case or one backed by a legit fund.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1338
Bounty hunters are alwasy blame for selling their tokens so quickly without waiting for the project develpment as outline in the roadmap.  I don't think bounty hunters are to blame because a lot of bounty hunters hold their coins for years.
Not only the bounty hunters are blaming on selling some coins early, Actually some traders also are doing that in the meantime. But all i see some topic are about those bounty hunters sell the coins early, Ill think they dont want to hold for a longtime.
Most bounty hunters are not really interested in holding their coins for the long term, in fact I will be surprised if they knew anything about the project they were promoting but to blame them and think they are the reason the price goes down is a mistake, most bounty hunters simply do not have the power to make the price to go down and anyone thinking otherwise is mistaken.
hero member
Activity: 946
Merit: 500
Bcnex - The Ultimate Blockchain Trading Platform
They tend to blame bounty hunters where in fact most of the early investors did it. Hunter may not be a big impact depending on their allocation of budget for the participants, but the investors play more of a big role especially those who receive or earn from early investor bonuses.
full member
Activity: 854
Merit: 101
Polkadog - Multi-Chain Defi Meme
Not only bounty, but there are indeed many factors that make prices drop dramatically after the initial listing on the exchange.


  • Sales Bonus
  • Low Market Volume
  • Market Conditions
Besides these 3 bounty factors can also cause why prices have decreased. and there should be a solution from a team such as making a trading competition to reduce the dump
yes, you are right, not only because the bounty hunter is the reason for the price decline that occurs when the initial token is registered in exchange. the reason you mentioned is the right reason and I think we all accept it because we also see the role of investors and traders in making price stability in the market.
hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 504
Not only bounty, but there are indeed many factors that make prices drop dramatically after the initial listing on the exchange.


  • Sales Bonus
  • Low Market Volume
  • Market Conditions
Besides these 3 bounty factors can also cause why prices have decreased. and there should be a solution from a team such as making a trading competition to reduce the dump
copper member
Activity: 798
Merit: 3
Bounty hunter has never been the cause of dumping of the token. This because they hold maximum a 5% number of token of total token subscribed. But, 80% of the company is only offering 2% for the bounty hunter. And this token amount is distributed a number of hunter say; one thousand, 5 thousand or even 10 thousand. So, they never be the cause of token dumping even they want.
jr. member
Activity: 359
Merit: 1
if in my opinion don't blame the hunter's bounty if the token has been entered in the stock exchange, then all who hold the token have the right to sell and buy because everyone wants to benefit all the investors can also sell early and buy at cheap prices with a double profit.
sr. member
Activity: 1414
Merit: 260
Bounty hunters are alwasy blame for selling their tokens so quickly without waiting for the project develpment as outline in the roadmap.  I don't think bounty hunters are to blame because a lot of bounty hunters hold their coins for years.
Not only the bounty hunters are blaming on selling some coins early, Actually some traders also are doing that in the meantime. But all i see some topic are about those bounty hunters sell the coins early, Ill think they dont want to hold for a longtime.
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 256
Decentralized Ascending Auctions on Blockchain
It depends on the tading volume.
For example bounty tokens like QuickX or Populous with trading volume in million of dollars are not affected because trading volume is much higher than bounty allocation.
But coins that are dead and inactive are affected, thanks to no volume a big dump is highly possible.  Cheesy
If it is a big project and has a trading volume of over 100 million USD, the bonus distribution will not affect much the value of that coin but to find a good project is really difficult because no any project can be listed at the top exchanges. Today Harmony project is making a lot of people happy and if bounty hunters can be paid today, they may be able to sell high prices.
sr. member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 354
Bounty hunters are alwasy blame for selling their tokens so quickly without waiting for the project develpment as outline in the roadmap.  I don't think bounty hunters are to blame because a lot of bounty hunters hold their coins for years.

It's important to consider volumes. Many people who bought in at ICO will be looking at the long-term, and not even put their coins on exchanges.

If a coin drops 90% from ICO price, but the only coins being traded are those from bounty hunters, then really it would be impossible to build up much of a dollar profit if there are only a small number of orders to fill. So for low volumes, the 'price' on an exchange isn't representative of the worth of the project.

If there is a total supply of 1 million tokens, and the exchange has only one order of one token priced at $1, this means the marketcap calculation is $1 x 1 million tokens = $1 million. Which is obviously nonsense. If that order gets filled and someone else puts on an order of 1 token priced at $2, it doesn't mean the project has now gained an extra $1 million in cap.
full member
Activity: 708
Merit: 103
Empowering crypto w/ sustainable energy
It depends on the tading volume.
For example bounty tokens like QuickX or Populous with trading volume in million of dollars are not affected because trading volume is much higher than bounty allocation.
But coins that are dead and inactive are affected, thanks to no volume a big dump is highly possible.  Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 868
Merit: 251
Sovryn - Brings DeFi to Bitcoin
I personally assess the cause of dumping because investors sell bonuses and some bounty hunter sell at low prices so in this case the bounty hunter can't be completely wrong
member
Activity: 512
Merit: 11
The first impression of the people is very important, even if the project is good but it started with a dump, it might affect the buying decision of investors. If the project is really good, the team will ensure that there will be no dump when it's release for trading, and even if bounty hunters have to dump, they already anticipated that and made the right measures to control the dump.
but now you alone can see is there a project that has the strength of the team like that? as far as I know, only XUC coins and project credits can make their prices stable and even increase when the bounty distribution has just been done.
in general, this is all idle chatter about Athens Hunters for the Bounty in a fall in cryptocurrency prices.  To date, the cryptocurrency market is all in poor condition and all cryptocurrencies have very low indicators.  So nothing to blame the participants of the Bounty campaign for all sins.
full member
Activity: 896
Merit: 100
The first impression of the people is very important, even if the project is good but it started with a dump, it might affect the buying decision of investors. If the project is really good, the team will ensure that there will be no dump when it's release for trading, and even if bounty hunters have to dump, they already anticipated that and made the right measures to control the dump.
but now you alone can see is there a project that has the strength of the team like that? as far as I know, only XUC coins and project credits can make their prices stable and even increase when the bounty distribution has just been done.
hero member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 604
I don't think it's entirely a bounty hunter's fault, if indeed the ICO project is indeed good, I don't think it will have too much impact if the bounty hunter sells his tokens
The first impression of the people is very important, even if the project is good but it started with a dump, it might affect the buying decision of investors. If the project is really good, the team will ensure that there will be no dump when it's release for trading, and even if bounty hunters have to dump, they already anticipated that and made the right measures to control the dump.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 500

if the team considers the bounty hunter to be blamed by the occurrence of a dump, then why do they make a bounty for the bounty hunter if they are afraid of their coins going down? I am completely unsure because the bounty hunter also works and needs money and not all bounty hunters make the decision to sell fast the tokens or coin they get.
well, maybe some people blame bounty hunters for selling large quantities at the same time, and of course it causes a dump. but, I think that dev can overcome that because of the total of all coins, the bounty hunter only holds 2-5% of the coins. however, not all bounty hunters sell their assets, so, I think we cannot blame bounty hunters for low prices in the long run.
sr. member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 260
Trphy.io
Bounty hunters couldn’t be blamed as the cause of token dumping. A lot of them keeps their tokens as a long investment too. Also my relate bounty hunters that I know didn't sell their tokens so quickly after their task was over.
They are the ones being blamed by the team as the weak support from their projects, if bounty rewards which only a small portions of actual funds can dumped the value of the coin what more to expect if the large portions will be dumped and sold by the team behind it.
if the team considers the bounty hunter to be blamed by the occurrence of a dump, then why do they make a bounty for the bounty hunter if they are afraid of their coins going down? I am completely unsure because the bounty hunter also works and needs money and not all bounty hunters make the decision to sell fast the tokens or coin they get.
legendary
Activity: 2982
Merit: 1028
Bounty hunters couldn’t be blamed as the cause of token dumping. A lot of them keeps their tokens as a long investment too. Also my relate bounty hunters that I know didn't sell their tokens so quickly after their task was over.
They are the ones being blamed by the team as the weak support from their projects, if bounty rewards which only a small portions of actual funds can dumped the value of the coin what more to expect if the large portions will be dumped and sold by the team behind it.
member
Activity: 663
Merit: 10
https://streamies.io/
Bounty hunters are alwasy blame for selling their tokens so quickly without waiting for the project develpment as outline in the roadmap.  I don't think bounty hunters are to blame because a lot of bounty hunters hold their coins for years.
Sometimes, bounty hunters are also investors. I also invested in Current project and also promoted their projects. I am a young investor, I only have $ 200 to invest and I want to receive more tokens and force me to participate in the bounty program.
In fact, a good project will know how to regulate the price and not make the price of the token reduced when the bounty is distributed. Like CPT and OATH are doing, they really have great strategies.
Pages:
Jump to: