Topic: Bounty Hunters the cause of token dumping ? - page 2. (Read 18964 times)
Bounty hunters couldn’t be blamed as the cause of token dumping. A lot of them keeps their tokens as a long investment too. Also my relate bounty hunters that I know didn't sell their tokens so quickly after their task was over.
I don't think it's entirely a bounty hunter's fault, if indeed the ICO project is indeed good, I don't think it will have too much impact if the bounty hunter sells his tokens
I think that a lot of actors in the cryptocurrency market are interested in blaming the names of Bounty Hunters for the fall in coin prices. Thus, it covers not only the lack of professionalism of the team, but also the low demand for the project in society.
hero member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 651
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me
Most of the times, project owners blame bounty hunters for token dump which isn't always the case. Some project doesn't have what it takes to run a project, some will list in low volume exchanges, no good team members etc, all these contribute to token dump
Neither listing of token on a low volume exchange nor bounty hunters are responsible for token dump. Although, listing of token on high volume sometimes boost investors trust but the main reason behind most token dump are the teams (i.e strategy they put together to ensure the success of the project ) and the early miners of a certain project. Bounty hunters are alwasy blame for selling their tokens so quickly without waiting for the project develpment as outline in the roadmap. I don't think bounty hunters are to blame because a lot of bounty hunters hold their coins for years.
Actually not all bounty hunters are dumper because many of them are holding their token for a good price. And how you can sold it many of are selling their token in low price. So as a holder you will wait a good price and time to sold what you have. And I think some always hurry to sell are always lose. It's impossible, usually the bounty hunters only get the largest share of 5% of the total supply/total sold coin, and I'm sure that the investors who get the bonus at the start made a dump, but I don't blame them, this is the importance of capital from devs. to keep prices from dropping.
I think the developers are the most responsible for this, they get free tokens, and if they sell at the beginning of the listing, of course they are lucky because they usually have more than 20% tokens, so I am very surprised why anyone thinks the bounters or investors is the cause of token dumping, they are actually members who have been harmed by the developer.
Most of the times, project owners blame bounty hunters for token dump which isn't always the case. Some project doesn't have what it takes to run a project, some will list in low volume exchanges, no good team members etc, all these contribute to token dump
It's impossible, usually the bounty hunters only get the largest share of 5% of the total supply/total sold coin, and I'm sure that the investors who get the bonus at the start made a dump, but I don't blame them, this is the importance of capital from devs. to keep prices from dropping.
i do believe that 35% of dumping is due to bounty hunters who are selling their token as soon as they got the opportunity, but i think if the platform is good, there is no reason for us to doubt the sudden bear market instead take it as an opportunity to invest.
yes, the dev responsible should make a buyback to prevent the price decline caused by the bounty hunters who sell their tokens.
i do believe that 35% of dumping is due to bounty hunters who are selling their token as soon as they got the opportunity, but i think if the platform is good, there is no reason for us to doubt the sudden bear market instead take it as an opportunity to invest.
yes, the dev responsible should make a buyback to prevent the price decline caused by the bounty hunters who sell their tokens. Bounty hunters are working for projects. They're promoting. They do research about the project. I think they have very positive work for the ecosystem. It doesn't make sense to blame them.
That is just a traditional reason why tokens dump. They will blame bounty huntere wherein time and effort were invested to their projects. What they didnt know is that some of them are investors as well. They could also blame those investors who got a lot of discount and will dump it to get their capital. But see we cannot also blame the team since there are also bounty hunters who will dump just for few bucks.
Bounty hunters should not be blame once there is a token dumping on new projects , the persons to blame are those who are greedy and wants to get immediate profit even they will only get small amount.
Bounty hunters are working for projects. They're promoting. They do research about the project. I think they have very positive work for the ecosystem. It doesn't make sense to blame them.
It was a very good period for bounty hunters. Bounty gains may increase with the start of the bull season again. Hope to have good days again.
I also hope so, I am bored with ICO scams and other frauds.by the way, the bounty hunter is not the cause of the price of the token broken, and I am disappointed with that comment. Investors and teams are responsible for the circulation and price of tokens.
It was a very good period for bounty hunters. Bounty gains may increase with the start of the bull season again. Hope to have good days again.
Bounty hunters are alwasy blame for selling their tokens so quickly without waiting for the project develpment as outline in the roadmap. I don't think bounty hunters are to blame because a lot of bounty hunters hold their coins for years.
To some extent yes. After working for several months for a project, when they collect payments, they seem to convert the tokens to fiat to solve their personal need but other times, private and presale investors and team who recieve huge amount off bonuses causes dump too
That's the other factor that has to be seen than putting the blame on the bounty hunters.
Bounty hunters in total does not receive a huge amount and even if the majority would sell, it would not cause a big dump because it's just a small amount in the supply. The team should not list the project if they can ensure volume, but if they allow, no one should complain as it's just temporary if the project is legit.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 2012
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
Some hold for long time when some don't. It's simple, in a market, you can't expect same behavior from all of its participants. There's nothing to blame them. I would say its DEV team who didn't give a fuck to the bounty amount and made it available to everyone.
Bounty hunters are alwasy blame for selling their tokens so quickly without waiting for the project develpment as outline in the roadmap. I don't think bounty hunters are to blame because a lot of bounty hunters hold their coins for years.
To some extent yes. After working for several months for a project, when they collect payments, they seem to convert the tokens to fiat to solve their personal need but other times, private and presale investors and team who recieve huge amount off bonuses causes dump too
In my opinion, it is not fair to accuse the participants of the Bounty company in the total fall in prices for tokens after the listing, although this does not happen without their participation. First, pay attention to the entire cryptocurrency market, because if you follow the price level until the end of 2018, prices fell on all cryptocurrencies, including the most rated ones. So what can we say about new projects in this situation? Of course, new coins did not withstand competition. Secondly, the total sale of all cryptocurrency and withdrawal, for example, Bitcoin and ethereum in Fiat, provoked price cuts, and therefore investors and participants of Bounty companies, to return at least the money spent, sell new counters for Ethereum and Bitcoin, which reduces the value of these coins. I think that there are a lot of reasons for the fall in prices for tokens and here we need to understand comprehensively, and not blame the participants of the Bounty company individually. Today, investors in the cryptocurrency market are not the most deceived people, because participants of the Bounty companies have no protection and their work today is not appreciated. Therefore, Bounty Hunters are also victims, not evil.
Anyway, Bounty companies are really in demand even today, when the market is in poor condition and no one can predict the real results of icon companies. But it is necessary to advertise projects and participants of the Bounty company are working on it, fulfilling all the conditions. But in order to be objective, all the same, Bounty Hunters in some cases abuse their capabilities, which in some cases negatively affects new projects. Although in fact you are right. 
i do believe that 35% of dumping is due to bounty hunters who are selling their token as soon as they got the opportunity, but i think if the platform is good, there is no reason for us to doubt the sudden bear market instead take it as an opportunity to invest.
sometimes, bounty hunters only hold 2-3% of the total tokens that exist. well, although it can be said that the hunter bounty is the cause, I think dev will easily cover that up. well, I think investors are also influential. many suggest that bounty hunters get paid using ETH, or other altcoins, only a few do that. Jump to: