I will stand for you and myself.Facts of those bounties are really ridiculous
Topic: Bounty hunters United we stand (Read 6730 times)
I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is
Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions
Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions
It is better to allocate a fixed bounty compared to limiting participants because there are millions of members of this forum who have the same goal. The limited bounty participants do not give forum members something in common, although this is a good part of a person. The criteria for forum members have become part of the participant restriction, for example, the minimum rank is full member, or has + merit.
In reality, hunters are totally helpless as they can't do anything about this matter. some bounty project come to promote themselves, have very low reward. I asked project manager for limit the perticipate, but he denied cause team need to promote their project with low reward, no matter if hunters received $1 or $2 as reward. that is really bad & have nothing to do in our hand except avoid those project
I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is
Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions
I understand your concern but there are so many bounty hunters compare to new projects, we cannot compare it to the year 2017 where there are as lot of projects and less bounty hunters, scammers also contributed to the demise of bounty hunters, because of to many scam projects, we now have less projects, developers prefer to do private sales than crowdfunding.Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions
Developers have no choice but to be on guard from the people that may ruin their project so they required KYC.
I still remember year 2017 that there are plenty of campaigns that accepts newbie, few scam campaigns, no merit system, no KYC needed, and most of all the high value of most of the Altcoins, tokens and other cryptocurrencies.
You have a good point OP, making fixed allocation for bounty rewards may sound good.
Yet, we cannot deny the fact that most of the team bringing up project are doing it for their own interest. This is usually a way for them stealing money as easy as possible in the sense of crowdfunding but it does not really mean a crowdfunding instead this is more like crowdsfunding and stealing activity. Usually they promise heaven but will brought you to hell.
Yet, we cannot deny the fact that most of the team bringing up project are doing it for their own interest. This is usually a way for them stealing money as easy as possible in the sense of crowdfunding but it does not really mean a crowdfunding instead this is more like crowdsfunding and stealing activity. Usually they promise heaven but will brought you to hell.
Bounty was so great before, i dont know if it was because bitcoin reach all time high or the project itself are really good and so many of them are legit. I remember bounty like eidoo, they pay $3,000,000 and they even limit their participant. Now, they pay $50,000 without participant limit. I think you or we need to stop joining bounty like that, we all know it's not gonna worth the time and the task.
I think your mixed up abouy this discussion. This isn't a spot to intentionally win cash. This abundance crusade is simply just an advantages of having conversation here. In the event that you are going to grumble about this, at that point better quit doing abundance and why make an effort not to get a genuine line of work that takes care of genuine cash. I don't think theymos or any administrator here would tune in to this. They will peruse yet this point will be disregarded reason abundance isn't important for need here on gathering. The supervisor is exceptionally persuasive in dealing with the abundance to progress and the tracker doesn't whine since it is as per what is finished.
Limit perticipation isn't going to possible even in future because CEO and team members are greedy. they just want to promote their project so cheaply when they raise so much fund by the help of hunters. even sometimes they start hypocrisy so that to avoid distributing payment among hunters
And some of those bounty with low bounty allocation sometimes do not pay they keep saying spreadsheet is not ready, until 1 month have pass they give another reason not to distribute the rewards
Limit perticipation isn't going to possible even in future because CEO and team members are greedy. they just want to promote their project so cheaply when they raise so much fund by the help of hunters. even sometimes they start hypocrisy so that to avoid distributing payment among hunters
I understand every bounty participants frustration, rewards nowadays are very ridiculous that’s why its better to limit participation by choosing what you think is profitable but its a very rare to find specially now that most new projects are failing.
I have no problem with rewards, the problem is it's hard to find a good project to join I have a friend who gave up bounty hunting because out of 20 campaigns he joined not even one gave him a profit, they either did not get into the market or the project is a scam, Dfinance is my first campaign hopefully I will be lucky in my first bounty campaign.
I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is
Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions
bounty allocations are almost fixed for every project. true that limiting the participants would be very helpful for bounty hunters, the number of participants makes the allocation obtained to be small. when viewing the final results in a spreadsheet that is very painful. So limiting participants is wise idea for this issueFixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions
bounty allocations are almost fixed for every project. true that limiting the participants would be very helpful for bounty hunters, the number of participants makes the allocation obtained to be small. when viewing the final results in a spreadsheet that is very painful. So limiting participants is wise idea for this issue
the hunters look divided into two type, the first type shouts and requires that the award was divided into 3+ parts, the second type of screaming that doesn't want to work for such pennies, one thing unites you that all just want to get normal money for their work, but this question is not only to the bounty Manager, and in the most part specifically to companies that vistawall such a small amount, but the problem is that even with a very small budget will still be people who will take part, sometimes I think that even if the company say that will not pay, but many will still take part
These rules should have been implemented a long time ago, I fully support, it is better to get $ 100, rather than$ 5 approximately, without restrictions
It sounds better, but is there a real way for us to get there anytime soon.Feels like most of the bounty hunters are not even here, I mean they won't hear this watchword
These rules should have been implemented a long time ago, I fully support, it is better to get $ 100, rather than$ 5 approximately, without restrictions
I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is
Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions
I prefer joining in bounty campaigns with limited bounty participants and heres why.Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions
Fixed bounty- unlimited participants, after the campaign ended they will only get 20$ or even lower,
Limited participants- bounty will be divided to few participants were they can get 100$ or above for the high rank members.
We are are group of people who absolutely ignore the campaign that does not guarantee a predictable reward. I may have joined a few in past but for last two years, I haven't joined any campaign that does not limit the number of users or guarantee a fixed price of token that could be precalculated. They might be a difficult to find but there are plenty of them.
Sure enough, I always followed a bounty project that provided limits for participants because in my opinion this indicates the burden of a project to pay participants in the future, but maybe now it's more difficult to find a good project in my opinion because even though the system is like that still the volume is different from before 
Mate, your points are so logical. Fixing allocation is not possible cause bounty manager can't do again about it but yes, he can limit perticipation 200 to 300. It will help bounty hunters, to have their proper reward and inspire them to work properly with joy
Managers can't do much, they are just managers, they get instructions from the team. And for the team and for the project
it's better to have more people for marketing than just a few of them. Here we can't discuss quality, maybe for the quality
they would give more money and pay for some expert advertising, not for random people on the forum who wish to support
the project for few dollars in their token.
I want to think bm are independent bodies providing services for this teams or various project teams, and as such, a good manager should have some terms and conditions laid out on how he/she carry out his management services this way no team can take advantage of both manager and the hunters who they managed,
Even if team the ones calling the shot about how they want the campaign to be run, a manager should equally have his/her conditions so that the team won't go against their initial agreement (which is part of the problem hunters are facing, team changing rules and conditions at the very end) to protect the hunters as well, but how many managers actually do this! They are more about their pocket than building a reputation or caring about hunters.
I have seen this same thread on altcoin discussion board, why did you repeat it here. Or you really need fighting squad?. Actually, you don't own a project, so they decide on what to do to bounty hunters. Some clearly stated before joining, that the project teams and BM has the right to change rules and regulations of campaigns. So you have nothing to do.
Either it fixed bounty allocations or limited participants, every project need vigorous participation, except one that would be listing on good exchange like Binance would consider those expectant you listed.
Either it fixed bounty allocations or limited participants, every project need vigorous participation, except one that would be listing on good exchange like Binance would consider those expectant you listed.
Mate, your points are so logical. Fixing allocation is not possible cause bounty manager can't do again about it but yes, he can limit perticipation 200 to 300. It will help bounty hunters, to have their proper reward and inspire them to work properly with joy
Managers can't do much, they are just managers, they get instructions from the team. And for the team and for the project
it's better to have more people for marketing than just a few of them. Here we can't discuss quality, maybe for the quality
they would give more money and pay for some expert advertising, not for random people on the forum who wish to support
the project for few dollars in their token.
You are right!Managers are just employees or just being hired by the team and they would just follow on what they had been ordered to do so and we know that when it comes to bounty
then maximum exposure would be the main goal or target.
They have nothing to do with projects success nor price up movements of tokens received thats the part of the risk on doing bounty hunting which should people who are engage
on this one should really be aware about.
Theres nothing you can do but to deal with the terms.Take or leave it!
Jump to: