Topic: Bounty hunters United we stand - page 3. (Read 6730 times)
The actions you take should follow the project and read the rules first. Many projects have different rules, some projects have also implemented participation limits for each campaign.so you just choose to follow it or not.
This is right, however, there is no one who can demand the project team to do what bounty hunters want. Even bounty manager are just following the instructions/orders from the team because they are the one who gives us the payment. They are free to choose token for the payment of bounty participants even if we don't want to, they are also the one who make rules, not us.
I think the days are still very fr when bounty hunters will unite to fight any course or project on payments. The way they fight each other is just something else. If only we can remove envy of seeing others prospers, then we will have one mind to fight.
All that is true. But for the new projects, there is no other options available. If they want to advertise to the investors, then there should be a good bounty campaign. Cash rich projects can opt for advertising using Google AdSense or similar services. But how many of the projects can afford to do that? With the bounties, they are getting advertisement almost for free.
You know what is the best part of cryptocurrency - be anonymous. Not all of the of the investors wants to be anonymous, but some definitely do. Using Google AdSense was never anonymous (as your connect your bank account/card to it and verify it). It might be not obvious, but insiders could spread the info about all the transactions and money movement to others.
If a projects announce that "Company A" is their investor, this company's competitors could also invest in this project. For the project is not bad, but for investors means loosing possibility to get more profit or control.
Imagine that you know that Apple stocks will go up next week, you buy some and plan to buy more, but your neighbor finds that out and buys all available stocks
Too many participants will definitely ruin the reward from a bounty campaign and there is nothing you can do about it if the bounty manager decides to keep allowing people to join the bounty, larger quantities of bounty hunters is exactly what many project team wants
as far as I think, we might be able to demand payment, but before making a project, they have written allocations and participants at the limit or not. we can't sue after that. other than that, you are free to join the project or not. Well, we all want to be paid using coins that are already on the market. but, I think, it's a difficult thing especially since it's been pushed for a long time. 
It is true that Bounty campaigns become less and less profitable with time and the only solutions are fixed bounty allocation or limited bounty participants, just as you said. Unfortunately, the most projects are not interested in Bounty hunters earnings, they just want to get an advertisement for as cheap as possible.
All that is true. But for the new projects, there is no other options available. If they want to advertise to the investors, then there should be a good bounty campaign. Cash rich projects can opt for advertising using Google AdSense or similar services. But how many of the projects can afford to do that? With the bounties, they are getting advertisement almost for free.
I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is
Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions
Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions
We all hope that there is a small policy that can help Bounthy Hunter in obtaining their rights. I am sure the parties in this forum will also sit down to discuss your questions.
Too many participants will definitely ruin the reward from a bounty campaign and there is nothing you can do about it if the bounty manager decides to keep allowing people to join the bounty, larger quantities of bounty hunters is exactly what many project team wants
If the price will be the same like what already promised and the hunters will actually received a good amount of reward but that depends on the manager because the manager will be focusing to reach the main aim to create a bounty campaign to create a massive awareness to the public. 
Too many participants will definitely ruin the reward from a bounty campaign and there is nothing you can do about it if the bounty manager decides to keep allowing people to join the bounty, larger quantities of bounty hunters is exactly what many project team wants
Actually it is not damaging the bounty campaign if there are many bounty participants, only the number of rewards received by bounty participants will be less, so this becomes a complaint from bounty participants and the solution is clear to the manager, namely by limiting the participants who enter the bounty campaign. 
It is true that Bounty campaigns become less and less profitable with time and the only solutions are fixed bounty allocation or limited bounty participants, just as you said. Unfortunately, the most projects are not interested in Bounty hunters earnings, they just want to get an advertisement for as cheap as possible.
not all projects mate. because some projects have decided to limit participants from joining, in fact, it is the job of the bounty manager to negotiate with the team before running the bounty. I mean the bounty manager must say if participants will be limited. if the team agrees then proceed with the launch of the campaign
It is true that Bounty campaigns become less and less profitable with time and the only solutions are fixed bounty allocation or limited bounty participants, just as you said. Unfortunately, the most projects are not interested in Bounty hunters earnings, they just want to get an advertisement for as cheap as possible.
I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is
Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions
Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions
We all hope that there is a small policy that can help Bounthy Hunter in obtaining their rights. I am sure the parties in this forum will also sit down to discuss your questions.
Too many participants will definitely ruin the reward from a bounty campaign and there is nothing you can do about it if the bounty manager decides to keep allowing people to join the bounty, larger quantities of bounty hunters is exactly what many project team wants
I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is
Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions
Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions
Yes this is true. Well, on their part they want to have thousands of participants because they want to spread their project widely. But due to so many of the participants, it cannot be truely monitored. Some are not worth it to receive stakes which is unfair to dedicated participants. I agree to limited bounty paticipants. Well I am already seeing a campaign that have limited participants in signature campaign. Yes it is a good thing. I just hope that is applicable in every allocation of a campaign.
previously the hunters had to estimate the total prize to be received, not just join and not know how many prizes were allocated and ultimately blame the project for the incident.
the total participation received by stakeholders and others, I think that is the basic thing that must be considered.
Dude, you can't know how exactly and the amount that you will be received it consider about all of the result depends on the how much price for each of token after it has already traded on the exchange site. the total participation received by stakeholders and others, I think that is the basic thing that must be considered.
That means if all are still random.
sometimes it happens that some project will not bring the expected reward, as hunters its more of the reward after much effort but for the project its more of the work for little little payment. not all projects will want to cap their participants because its of more benefit to them for much crowd and also with respect to the BM handling the campaign. it will be good to see more capped project nevertheless, some good projects will still pay no matter the crowd of participants.
I agree with you when it comes to having a cap or fixed payment for bounty hunters not because it's our right but because our efforts should be worth something because we're working for it and should gain a better payment from months of work done. If bounty managers can hear us and cap their campaigns it will be to our own interest and those who found the project on time because many late comers will not have any campaign to join.
previously the hunters had to estimate the total prize to be received, not just join and not know how many prizes were allocated and ultimately blame the project for the incident.
the total participation received by stakeholders and others, I think that is the basic thing that must be considered.
the total participation received by stakeholders and others, I think that is the basic thing that must be considered.
In general, a good campaign is always a lot of followers, because every bounty hunter is obviously always looking for a good bounty campaign not a bad one, so in this case what must be considered is the number of token allocations given to the campaign, apart from the number of participants, because many bounty campaigns whose followers are lonely because they are not qualified, do you want to follow a campaign that is not qualified ?
Not the number but the quality, always, always, always.
You want to see bounty campaign type with bounty hunters? Go look at the bounties threads and join Telegram. 30k per channel filled with ppl asking "wen distribution"?
I've seen channels with 50 people and everyone's so active and knowledgeable. I want that one.
The most prominent thread i have noticed about bounty hunting is usually about payments, number of participants; or perhaps number of exited bounties. When are we going to address the influx of participants into fraudulent bounty programs? We need to indulge and educate all bounty hunters to do the most minimum basics before joining any bounty program. Do your research, figure out the principles of the program, and make it tick.
After which, we can then worry about the no of participants or allocated token.
After which, we can then worry about the no of participants or allocated token.
Jump to: