Topic: Bounty hunters United we stand - page 4. (Read 6730 times)
It's really sad and disheartening that these project owners and their bounty managers keep getting away with all these time wasting of a thing. But sometimes I really don't blame them, I blame the hunters who will always rush to register in any campaign they see without even bothering to peruse the project. My advice to hunters is to avoid any bounty with a duration longer than 8weeks. Secondly, look at the payment structure. Thirdly, they should check the BM before participating in their bounties.
the allocation to the bounty hunter has been determined from the first, and the bounty conditions now are also different, where there are more participants than the ongoing project, so we can only choose and follow the bounty that meets our expectations.
one of the solutions to this is the dev that keeps the price of the coin.
no one can keep the price of coins in the market, because the one who has an important role here is a trader. Dev and the team can only develop products well
Your suggestion is very good, where we can avoid the bounty project that is crowded with participants because the more crowded the participants, the allocation of funds we get will also be less and we also have to see bounties that have a chance of success later
In general, a good campaign is always a lot of followers, because every bounty hunter is obviously always looking for a good bounty campaign not a bad one, so in this case what must be considered is the number of token allocations given to the campaign, apart from the number of participants, because many bounty campaigns whose followers are lonely because they are not qualified, do you want to follow a campaign that is not qualified ? 
As a hunter, I do not tend to join on bounties that I know will not reach my expectations, Most of the bounties out there doesn't really give me that satisfaction. So I tend to really do my research until I found a decent one. But, This doesn't mean that bounties should not change. Well if there's something you learned about this is that Bounties should raise their stakes if they don't, Hunters will get tired on doing labor for the for of an hour in McDonalds.
Limiting participants will be the best way to protect bounty hunters. Currently there are too few good projects but too many bounty hunters in operation, and this situation makes every good campaign have a lot of participants. And at the end of the campaign each person receives only $ 5-10 for many months of work, because the number of participants is too crowded. So the new bounty needs to limit the participants to ensure the benefits of the bounty hunter
I am a bounty hunter too, we cannot expect good results to every bounties we are joining. Infact joining this forum is free. So to avoid getting $5 for the 3months work. Examine the bounty, do not join an over crowded bounty. Checkout their bounty allocation, it must be 3% to 5% of their ICO.
Your suggestion is very good, where we can avoid the bounty project that is crowded with participants because the more crowded the participants, the allocation of funds we get will also be less and we also have to see bounties that have a chance of success later
now the cost we get from the bounty project is very little compared to 2017-2018 due to various factors caused by scammers, so the bounty project is now less and the bounty hunter is increasing.
We all know that bounty campaigns are not as good as before. There are lots of drama, rules are suddenly changed, distribution is delayed, allocation is cut, reward is locked, and so on. Before deciding to join the campaign, we should know that this is a risk, and protesting is just a waste of energy and is useless.We should be more tolerant, because the situation is like this. Projects that look good can end up being scams, projects that look just plain, turn out to be of great benefit. Sometimes I think that the luck factor plays a big role.
The only way we can make peace with this situation is to accept all failures as a risk, if you don't want that then don't join.
Or choose a project that gives BTC rewards, weekly payments, like those managed by Hhampuz, it gives guarantees. The rest we bet on two possibilities, paid and not.
now the cost we get from the bounty project is very little compared to 2017-2018 due to various factors caused by scammers, so the bounty project is now less and the bounty hunter is increasing.
I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is
Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions
No one will save your stupidity,You are the one who's letting yourself to be scammed and fooled.Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions
You already know that they are scammer yet advertising their project and if you did not received payments you will cry.
to be honest, I feel that the rewards given are quite large. however, the problem is when the price of a token does not match the initial price. this makes the reward that initially $ 300k worth $ 50k or even less than that. one of the solutions to this is the dev that keeps the price of the coin.
that's because many new projects don't have a strong market. will be different when they are listed on a large exchange with high trading. of course, they must be supported by marketing and large events to continue to maintain the price of their tokens in the market.
It is absolutely right that there must be an improvement to the bounty campaign, if it continues like this it will continue to harm
the bounty hunters. There are so many bounties that I have follow, and end up with a very low payment. If fixed bounty allocation
seems difficult to realize, that makes more sense with limited bounty participants. So the amount of payment received by bounty
hunters can also be feasible. Hopefully the bounty manager can start immediately limited participants from joining the bounty campaign.
the bounty hunters. There are so many bounties that I have follow, and end up with a very low payment. If fixed bounty allocation
seems difficult to realize, that makes more sense with limited bounty participants. So the amount of payment received by bounty
hunters can also be feasible. Hopefully the bounty manager can start immediately limited participants from joining the bounty campaign.
Actually joining bounty campaign to earn massive profits is not trustworthy... especially those campaign who have a bunch of participants like there's no limit . . 
In fact in the first place if you really cares about the efforts you always put in such work , probably you will always notice it that it's not worth it to join such overload campaign
. And for sure there's already a doubts in your self before joining,, Wherein "if they can really guarantee such award each participants at the end of the day? ". Will for me that's impossible .. It's possible only but not the exact amount what they promised since the very first start... You know find some real work where you can gain real money instead relying in bounties cause its just wasting time. Since mostly bounty nowadays wants more participants to join in there campaign.. just to save their projects from drowning . Lol
Imagine 5$ in 8 months? Wtf is that!!?. Lmao
In fact in the first place if you really cares about the efforts you always put in such work , probably you will always notice it that it's not worth it to join such overload campaign
. And for sure there's already a doubts in your self before joining,, Wherein "if they can really guarantee such award each participants at the end of the day? ". Will for me that's impossible .. It's possible only but not the exact amount what they promised since the very first start... You know find some real work where you can gain real money instead relying in bounties cause its just wasting time. Since mostly bounty nowadays wants more participants to join in there campaign.. just to save their projects from drowning . LolImagine 5$ in 8 months? Wtf is that!!?. Lmao
There's a great need for bounty hunters to unite and see an end to this issue of repression by project owners. Payment for task carried out are based on luck because we aren't sure of payment until it comes to our wallet. Most times, hunters are made to work for several months and after the task are being carried out, the project owners starts shifting tables on when payment would be made. I personally waited for over 6 months for XDB (Digitalbits) only for my hopes to be dashed.
one of the solutions to this is the dev that keeps the price of the coin.
no one can keep the price of coins in the market, because the one who has an important role here is a trader. Dev and the team can only develop products well
I understand you, right now we have less bounty projects and many bounty hunters, unlike 2017 when we have many bounty projects with less bounty hunters, limited participants can't hurt a project but I'm no so sure that many BMs will accept this, some will still say 'No' and there is nothing we can do to change this.
I think is not important about limited participants but how trusted of bounty campaign manager publish their campaign and give good reward for bounty participants, most important thing bounty campaign manager could guarantee with their bounty management and how trusted will listed on exchange market and have value.
to be honest, I feel that the rewards given are quite large. however, the problem is when the price of a token does not match the initial price. this makes the reward that initially $ 300k worth $ 50k or even less than that. one of the solutions to this is the dev that keeps the price of the coin. Bounty hunters of ICO are treated cheap, these developers and bounty managers can because people still join bounty that are already full with so many participants and the allocation is just to small, as loan as bounty hunters accepts and joined campaign that are already full the cheap price in bounty will go on, because bounty hunters want to receive token however small, hoping that the price will be better in the market.
I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is
Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions
Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions
Bounty hunters of ICO are treated cheap, these developers and bounty managers can because people still join bounty that are already full with so many participants and the allocation is just to small, as loan as bounty hunters accepts and joined campaign that are already full the cheap price in bounty will go on, because bounty hunters want to receive token however small, hoping that the price will be better in the market.
It's quite unfortunate that issues pertaining to payment for bounty hunters have been ongoing for a long time without any sign of review by projects. Its much more ridiculous when after participants are promised payments after a very long period and at the end of the day are sent out without any compensation for job done. I've been bitten severally by these projects and would love to see a change. Bounty hunting is getting worthless by the day and it's not a good idea.
Jump to: