Topic: BOUNTY PAYMENT PROBLEMS: Too long to wait before being PAID! - page 8. (Read 1778 times)
Well, that's right. I also experienced many obstacles in bounty payments that I follow. if what you mentioned earlier is the reason, the likelihood in my opinion is that when the fund raising price is not in accordance with the current state of the price. so they are buying time to wait for the price to return to normal.
I have seen this type of behaviour also coming from a number of ICO, possibly the worst to date has been HDAC who have still not paid their bounties 8 months after the campaign ended. Part of the dealy came with them launching their mainnet but since then they have just made excuse after excuse to delay the payments it is very poor but there is nothing we can really do.
What happen to Many Bounty Campaigns Now? They are setting the "New Norms" in Paying Bounty Payments? "100th days after the ICO" or "EVEN QUARTERLY BASIS" there reason is to avoid dumping and stabilize the Coin/Token Price, and after 100th days pass another reason was blame "NETWORK CONGESTION"? is this acceptable I need your Strong but definitive Opinion?
I believe that not all ICO companies will delay payments so much. Those who will indicate this in the context of joining the ICO generosity campaign can simply be ignored. There are a lot of ICO campaigns now, and they need advertising. If few people join them because of this, they will quickly change their conditions.If these are SEC requirements, then they apply only to the territory of the United States. It is not worth registering an ICO there.
Well i agree if to avoid dumping and makes the price far from ico price. But after date of payment passed and still got not paid. There is something wrong that project possibly scam project. The only thing we can do is to follow news by joining telegram group and official websitw of project.
that does not sound good. with such a behavior they can also ruin the name of an ico or project in the aftermath. i hope the ico operators see that such behavior is unacceptable.
Yes, this is becoming very common. There was an ICO that said, before bounty hunters can get their tokens, gas fee has to reduce first. To my amazement, since the ICO ended, they are still paying bounty hunters.
What happen to Many Bounty Campaigns Now? They are setting the "New Norms" in Paying Bounty Payments? "100th days after the ICO" or "EVEN QUARTERLY BASIS" there reason is to avoid dumping and stabilize the Coin/Token Price, and after 100th days pass another reason was blame "NETWORK CONGESTION"? is this acceptable I need your Strong but definitive Opinion?
It is a common problem recently, I was participating in one particular bounty, which called a Morpheus Network, and they are still not giving me my reward instead they just complaining, few months already.
Almost all ICOs are extending bounty duration recently without increasing bounty pool, most bounties that have started as early as February a good example is TV two which finished bounty July 24th and still have to wait till August 24th before distribution... I hope these people start honouring their terms and keeping to their words according to their bounty campaign timeline
Yes this is annoying and sucks! I hate this. Because till i get my token, it falls like 3 -->1.
Unfortunately, this takes a place so often. Bounty rewards are going to have a little interest for bounty hunters. The price are not dumped with them. But after 100 days, the coin can just die.
I participated in the bounty from Velix.ID.
They have already held the 2nd stage of the bounty, but they do not want to pay the earned tokens
They have already held the 2nd stage of the bounty, but they do not want to pay the earned tokens
What happen to Many Bounty Campaigns Now? They are setting the "New Norms" in Paying Bounty Payments? "100th days after the ICO" or "EVEN QUARTERLY BASIS" there reason is to avoid dumping and stabilize the Coin/Token Price, and after 100th days pass another reason was blame "NETWORK CONGESTION"? is this acceptable I need your Strong but definitive Opinion?
luckily i have not experienced anything like that yet, but i still do not like that. if you have done your job, you should also be paid. so i think it is fair, everything else is unfair.
First, be choosy when participating in a bounty. Check how they treat hunters first. If the overall attitude is that hunters are workers, rather than supporting the project, then avoid it. They will never treat you with respect.
And about bounty hunters dumping: Not every one does that, but it's not a bad thing all together.
If the dump starts, the trading starts. Money, even crypto, has to be active to gain value. If there is nothing to trade, it's not interesting.
Besides, it is a perfect opportunity for traders to pick up some cheap coin, so I don't get the complaining.
If the project is solid, it will regain it's value and holders will get value.
And about bounty hunters dumping: Not every one does that, but it's not a bad thing all together.
If the dump starts, the trading starts. Money, even crypto, has to be active to gain value. If there is nothing to trade, it's not interesting.
Besides, it is a perfect opportunity for traders to pick up some cheap coin, so I don't get the complaining.
If the project is solid, it will regain it's value and holders will get value.
What happen to Many Bounty Campaigns Now? They are setting the "New Norms" in Paying Bounty Payments? "100th days after the ICO" or "EVEN QUARTERLY BASIS" there reason is to avoid dumping and stabilize the Coin/Token Price, and after 100th days pass another reason was blame "NETWORK CONGESTION"? is this acceptable I need your Strong but definitive Opinion?
Simple, find a better bounty with weekly payment or monthly payment. You know you don't have to stick with something shady like bounty from ICO since most ICO not really bright at all.
Any campaign who delays payment too much does not have a good team. The problem is not about dumping, It is the fear behind the dumping. Most times when the market is in a dip, some team members fear to go on the exchange and therefore stretch their campaign further. I think most of them delay because of fear.
Yeah i also promoted two icos that are delaying the bounty reward tokens, one of them is delaying due to token swap, i think bounty participants have the right to be awarded the reward as soon as possible, it should not be delayed.
They need do that, because they know when distribute token to bounty hunter, almost of them want to sell immediately.
That's wrong. People always attribute Post-ico dumping to bounty participants. But that's very wrong. Even ICOs without any bounty program dumped without mercy. The token value would dump with or without bounty and most bounty participants are investors too who would want nothing more than to profit off their holdings.
Recent days I have spotted that we are facing more and more problems with bounties, and they all will be extended on half year, or they will cancel the Bounty whatever.
This is indeed not a very nice practice from the ICO's the use this method. The bad part is that you can never how long they will delay the payment. For this reason i prefer to join Bountyhive's campaigns, because they are paying the rewards fast almost all the time.
Late payments in bounty campaigns have become one of the biggest problems in the sector. There should be very clear rules on payment times, at most within 30-60 days after the end of the ICO they should pay, but even when it is written they never respect these times and this is an unsustainable situation
Jump to: