Topic: [BOUNTY][ICO] Age of Rust - RUSTBITS Game Economy & Trading cards [CLOSED] - page 15. (Read 54976 times)

End of the month is still planned. However, due to Segwit and BIP 148, there may be a few days delay as a chain split on bitcoin would cause problems with the distribution.  A few of us are monitoring the situation including the counterparty team. The planned date is still July 31st at the moment, but may move to August 7th due to Segwit/BIP 148

You also have to factor in the paid distribution too, as an example, demo accounts made up 25% of the pool reward in that case. This puts the bounty campaign more in line with other campaigns, but still more than others, augementors, for example. In the end, everyone is going to get tokens.

I do like your idea of a special card though.

I think such disproportion is not good.

So this is the latest update. When will Rustbits be distributed? the end of this month?

I support a re-balancing and participated in the signature campaign, but that is really extreme for all the pools under 500k.

I would suggest to put them closer to 100-200k rather than 30-60k. It would still be fair to the other campaigns and be less misleading to those who participated in these lower ones.

All,

Here's the new consolidated payout sheet, it combines all the campaigns into one view. The number in bold is the amount of Rustbits that will be going to that address.

Consolidated Sheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fB8_gn_UoCUJsYq8BHgD9TV_Fgv5vmYbCBeZK5Fr5Ds/edit?usp=sharing

This also has the re-balancing of the pools, it provides a fair payout which was the original intent.  
Example: A campaigner who is a Hero Member at the start of the signature campaign will have earned about 40,000 Rustbits (~0.4btc worth)
Example 2: A campaigner who only signed up for the newsletter will have earned about 100 Rustbits (~0.0011btc worth).
Example 3: Your average campaigner who signed up for the game demo, newsletter, and did tweets and facebook shares will have earned about 3,000 rustbits (~0.03btc worth).

New Pool adjustment:
Demo Account - 30k
Twitter - 500k
Facebook - 500k
Blogs - 30k
Signatures - 1M
Translations - 60k
Newsletter - 30k
To be burned:  12.85M

Some of you submitted either an ethereum address, no payout address, or something else, so I'll be reaching out to a few of you to get these issues fixed.

Also, there's one campaigner who only speaks Russian and I can't understand his issue, so if you speak Russian fluently, I could use your help

All,

Here's the new consolidated payout sheet, it combines all the campaigns into one view. The number in bold is the amount of Rustbits that will be going to that address.

Consolidated Sheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fB8_gn_UoCUJsYq8BHgD9TV_Fgv5vmYbCBeZK5Fr5Ds/edit?usp=sharing

This also has the re-balancing of the pools, it provides a fair payout which was the original intent.  
Example: A campaigner who is a Hero Member at the start of the signature campaign will have earned about 40,000 Rustbits (~0.4btc worth)
Example 2: A campaigner who only signed up for the newsletter will have earned about 100 Rustbits (~0.0011btc worth).
Example 3: Your average campaigner who signed up for the game demo, newsletter, and did tweets and facebook shares will have earned about 3,000 rustbits (~0.03btc worth).

New Pool adjustment:
Demo Account - 30k
Twitter - 500k
Facebook - 500k
Blogs - 30k
Signatures - 1M
Translations - 60k
Newsletter - 30k
To be burned:  12.85M

Some of you submitted either an ethereum address, no payout address, or something else, so I'll be reaching out to a few of you to get these issues fixed.

Also, there's one campaigner who only speaks Russian and I can't understand his issue, so if you speak Russian fluently, I could use your help

All,

Here's the new consolidated payout sheet, it combines all the campaigns into one view. The number in bold is the amount of Rustbits that will be going to that address.

Consolidated Sheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fB8_gn_UoCUJsYq8BHgD9TV_Fgv5vmYbCBeZK5Fr5Ds/edit?usp=sharing

This also has the re-balancing of the pools, it provides a fair payout which was the original intent.  
Example: A campaigner who is a Hero Member at the start of the signature campaign will have earned about 40,000 Rustbits (~0.4btc worth)
Example 2: A campaigner who only signed up for the newsletter will have earned about 100 Rustbits (~0.0011btc worth).
Example 3: Your average campaigner who signed up for the game demo, newsletter, and did tweets and facebook shares will have earned about 3,000 rustbits (~0.03btc worth).

New Pool adjustment:
Demo Account - 30k
Twitter - 500k
Facebook - 500k
Blogs - 30k
Signatures - 1M
Translations - 60k
Newsletter - 30k
To be burned:  12.85M

Some of you submitted either an ethereum address, no payout address, or something else, so I'll be reaching out to a few of you to get these issues fixed.

Also, there's one campaigner who only speaks Russian and I can't understand his issue, so if you speak Russian fluently, I could use your help

Also, some news to share,  something official will come out later, but RustChain Cards will be in Book of Orbs late summer / early fal

Make a decent plan that no one should disappoint because already many people who bought in ICO they are happy and people who promote it also should be happy because they have done the task for you for promotional activity.

I'll be posting it in the next few hours with a centralized payout list so campaigners don't have to go through each sheet to total up everything themselves.

@cloverme when can we expect the information about new bounty distribution structure?

THis is not good for Dev because already you mentioned many times about this bounty distribution and now you are changing the payment to bounty people and reducing the number of RUSTBITS to the bounty participants. Only the promotional activity is through with the bounty people but only because of two people you are reducing the payments to bounty participants. Think about it twice because now there is no Escrow for the project once Escrow is there means he will distribute the bounties according you mentioned above in bounty thread. That's why I suggest many people go with the escrow there are many cruel devs after collecting a huge amount of money and will change the bounty structure according to their Benefits.

Yeah, I mean there's a legitimate concern from the community on the bounty rewards excessive. The intent of the campaign was not to be an airdrop/giveaway, but rather tokens in return for legitimate campaigning. Applying math to what's "fair" is difficult, especially if you take the conversion rates of bitcoin into account which is like an elevator ride everyday. I see adjusting the bounty levels with a haircut across the top and then adding those to the burn pool.  What I didn't forsee is an unbalancing in the bounty reward pools against the overall campaign, i.e signing up for a newsletter should not reward more than a signature. Febo was sharp to point it out and I didn't catch at first because it was being labeled as a scam and I took offense to that, but once I did the math, he was right, it wasn't balanced. That doesn't make it a scam though, my intent was to reward people for doing things in the campaign, but the pool was unbalanced. Redistributing the pool will solve the issue with a pool burn of excess shares.

It would do the following:

A) Campaigners would still get a large amount of rustbits (avg 14k rustbits if you were in all campaigns)
B) The additional burn adds more scarcity for both campaigners and buyers
C) Buyers have confidence that the campaign is legitimate and not a giveaway
D) Dev does not benefit from the cut in any way

Both you and Febo had both campaigners and buyers in mind and keenly spotted out some of the issues at hand.