I hate every campaign where is KYC required. They will not share the rest of tokens for honest participant, they will keep them.
I do not understand why I have to provide KYC them, I didnt buy anything...
Topic: Bouty and KYC - page 13. (Read 2873 times)
KYC has recently been asked to finish the bouty program. This makes it difficult to update people's information. For example, participants did not update information, or some people were afraid of giving out their information because it was confidential, or some KYC could not be updated because of some program error. .
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
Actually, asking for kyc in the final program is a good way. It will make cheaters waste their effort. Those who diluted the stakes will have to give up the common parts they have cheated.
There's a lot of bounty campaign at the beginning saying that after the ICO are required KYC and some of them after the campaign the announce that need to pass KYC. There are simple way if you don't want an bounty that required KYC you should leave and find another campaign that no kyc needed.
There are cases when the ICO team simply don't know from the beginning that they will need to require KYC for bounty hunters. If the legal team decides they can't distribute any tokens without KYC verification, then I understand why it happens that way
The KYC may be good in many aspect, but to me, it has been a complication. It has deprived me of some of my tokens. I never knew KYC screening will appear when I register for the campaign and I didn't have a few criteria which they were asking for, it was really painful. So for noe any campaign that is bound by KYC, I avoid.
KYC has recently been asked to finish the bouty program. This makes it difficult to update people's information. For example, participants did not update information, or some people were afraid of giving out their information because it was confidential, or some KYC could not be updated because of some program error. .
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
Actually, asking for kyc in the final program is a good way. It will make cheaters waste their effort. Those who diluted the stakes will have to give up the common parts they have cheated.
As a bounty hunter, we have to follow the rules. KYC or not is a decision of the development team but it needs to be announced before the program starts to let community members know it will be applied.
I have seen that now KYC has been one of the major tools in ICO's. What I have realized is that those ICO's that involves KYC has been successful. So for now I think KYC is good and involving it in their bounties is not something new.
To me, I only accept KYC when the amount of money I earn from the bounty is over $ 1000, which is a pretty big amount for me, so I accepted to give my information to someone. However, for those who earn less, that is a mistake, many bounty hunters will not participate with KYC conditions.
actually I also want the same thing about KYC requests for each bounty program. if KYC is requested 1 week after the program was launched.
after I learned some time back by reading every information about the bounty, KYC requests were subject to regulations.
after I learned some time back by reading every information about the bounty, KYC requests were subject to regulations.
Kyc is used to verified the number of participants in bounty, it fixed out scammer... it bring the truth out
When they announce if it required or not at first, it is totally understandable but when they say it at the end, it is not ethical.
we know that many people still have a problem about kyc to join a bounty. we know that in kyc we have to collect our personal data. there is also a kyc that uses a passport and it is troublesome for people who don't have it. but kyc is a rule in a bounty and we must obey it.
I agree, because I don't want to disclose my data and I don't trust to ICO , my data can be leaked. That's why I pay attention to requirement prior to participate and this rules changing is awful.
Bounty participants aren't customers, that's why they aren't obligated to pass KYC
Bounty participants aren't customers, that's why they aren't obligated to pass KYC
I understand your point but if you are a bounty hunter and participate in signature campaign you have no choice but to pass an kyc to get your bounty rewards. Perhaps there's a purpose why the bounty required KYC for participants like avoid using multiple accounts.
I agree, because I don't want to disclose my data and I don't trust to ICO , my data can be leaked. That's why I pay attention to requirement prior to participate and this rules changing is awful.
Bounty participants aren't customers, that's why they aren't obligated to pass KYC
Bounty participants aren't customers, that's why they aren't obligated to pass KYC
I understand your point but if you are a bounty hunter and participate in signature campaign you have no choice but to pass an kyc to get your bounty rewards. Perhaps there's a purpose why the bounty required KYC for participants like avoid using multiple accounts.
I agree, because I don't want to disclose my data and I don't trust to ICO , my data can be leaked. That's why I pay attention to requirement prior to participate and this rules changing is awful.
Bounty participants aren't customers, that's why they aren't obligated to pass KYC
Bounty participants aren't customers, that's why they aren't obligated to pass KYC
I do not understand the reason why a bounty hunter who is not an investor is being asked to do a KYC before his bounty reward can be sent. This does not make any sense to me and I believe it is another scheme to deny the bounty hunters their hard earned reward. Some times nobody will be informed at the inception of the bounty of the KYC only for them to comeup with the issue of KYC at the end of the bounty not even at the thread but at their telegram page. If by chance you did not see the notification on telegram and it is closed you have lost your reward.
KYC is a requirement that is widely avoided by the bounty hunter. whether for reasons of what certainly when there is a KYC then they seek safe so that the identity they have not fallen into the wrong people. but many have been announced at the beginning of the bounty if need KYC and not. This will be quite important given the course is nothing like the KYC and approve or not.
The bounty manager has a different way to organize bounty hunters / participation, in my opinion he has the right to announce KYC at the beginning or at the end of the bounty, I have no problem with that, which I fear is only the bounty manager does not pay the participants in full.
KYC has recently been asked to finish the bouty program. This makes it difficult to update people's information. For example, participants did not update information, or some people were afraid of giving out their information because it was confidential, or some KYC could not be updated because of some program error. .
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
Thanks I learn something from your post. 3-4 weeks left until the end of bounty campaigns. I'll be careful about that. With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
and check our 6 bounty programs which you can take part in simultaneosly!
if you know the Bounty Dehedge Token is exactly what you are talking about here.
at the beginning of the campaign it was normal and there was no word "KYC needed" but after the bounty campaign finished boutny the manager asked KYC.
and that was Ianbgsung's request from the Dehedge Development Team, a pity!
at the beginning of the campaign it was normal and there was no word "KYC needed" but after the bounty campaign finished boutny the manager asked KYC.
and that was Ianbgsung's request from the Dehedge Development Team, a pity!
Jump to: