Topic: Bouty and KYC - page 8. (Read 2855 times)
I think KYC is a nuisance and create the gap between users with the project. This is hindered and the negative impact to the project, users will be more skeptical, projects are really good? Personal information is an important issue, the question arises: Project collects personal information of the user to what purpose? There are many ways to fight fraud and the use of the KYC is an unwise
KYC has recently been asked to finish the bouty program. This makes it difficult to update people's information. For example, participants did not update information, or some people were afraid of giving out their information because it was confidential, or some KYC could not be updated because of some program error. .
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
Not all bounty programs must do KYC Verification. But, if that must include KYC, as participants must do it. Not updating information, I think it's the fault of those who don't see the latest information from the bounty program, or they don't enter the telegram group from the bounty project. Each participant must enter their telegram group to get the latest information about their bounty. With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
I experienced this once but luckily I passed the kyc. Maybe the ico asked for bounty kyc and it has nothing to do with bounty managers so don't hate them.
I agree with you mate don't hate the Bounty managers,that is not their decision to make the Bounty participants to perform kyc that is CEO decision,because their are some country that cannot participate in their ICO due to SEC regulation or the CEO detect that many cheaters participating in their Campaign.
Well, there is no problem with me if the bounty program needs a process of submitting KYC requirements as a another way of verifying person identity because it can add more security for people who wants to make fraud and scam. And also for criminality act of doing.
Bounty with KYC I strongly agree with this because having a positive impression besides that with KYC can minimize multiple accounts, we all know that many bounty hunters have multiple accounts.
In my opinion, the exposure of KYC in the Bounty was very good to reduce participants who cheated on the Bounty campaign. so it can save tokens from fraudulent bounty participant accounts.
KYC has recently been asked to finish the bouty program. This makes it difficult to update people's information. For example, participants did not update information, or some people were afraid of giving out their information because it was confidential, or some KYC could not be updated because of some program error. .
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
Indeed, if a certain ICO will require KYC to the bounty then it is right to declare it in advance so that the hunters will think twice before joining and its better for the hunters to prepare their KYC credentials in advance because i see it all the same procedures and requirements if KYC will really be require. In these ways we could reduce the time to be wasted and the possible delay.
KYC is needed to bounty program because it can avoid the scammer and fraud. Those people who are very greedy fill the form twice to get more stakes. Now the people pay attention before prior to participate.
This is the best way to do things. The manager should announce that their is KYC before anything starts. If their is KYC in any program, it should be announced before tbr commencement of any bounty
more recently, I was strongly against KYS , but looking in the bounty comes crazy number of bots I think KYS exit from this situation. on the other, how to deal with bots I don't know(
KYC has recently been asked to finish the bouty program. This makes it difficult to update people's information. For example, participants did not update information, or some people were afraid of giving out their information because it was confidential, or some KYC could not be updated because of some program error. .
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
I agree with this opinion. KYC should be informed at the beginning of launching a bounty campaign so that all participants are ready to provide their data. I joined a number of bounties and needed a KYC, and several times my KYC was rejected. even though I have worked optimally in following each regulation of the bounty manager With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
KYC was respected and followed well by bounty hunters and managers until people started using it as a scam. KYC is now not that used anymore. A few bounty hunters request that bounty hunter does fill these forms. Hunters do hate it though, but if you are to fill and get your tokens, why not?
I think the KYC during and after the bounty campaign was a tactic to delay the token distribution especially with the bearish market. This happens a lot in the past. I also agree that the bounty manager had to announce the KYC before the bounty so the participants had an idea and handle it early.
With this a bounty hunter had option if they want to participate or not for privacy reasons.
With this a bounty hunter had option if they want to participate or not for privacy reasons.
You can keep my rewards, im not gonna give them my personal private data for that amount of money 
I am neutral about KYC procedure, but I also think that it should be announced from the very beginning, as some participants do not want to pass it in principle. The forum is usually written that they have the right to change the rules throughout the campaign, so we must be prepared for everything.
i think KYC procedure was needed to avoid and pinpoint the cheater, so the Project wont go dump by the cheater whos got a lot of reward by submit multy account.
People have been mincing these word together. Even devs are supposed to diffentiate between this two terms: KYC-verification and Bounty hunters. In as much as kyc is meant for customers and bounty hunters are not customers, then they shouldn't be requested to pass KYC.
I feel happy if KYC is needed to get tokens or coins, because many people have many accounts and it makes me feel disadvantaged. KYC is the right choice to use.
if it has become a rule in a bounty, then we must obey it. with the kyc we must collect our personal identity. there are many people who support it and some don't. many people can't because they have a reason for that. but as a bounty hunter and also an investor, we must comply with the rules that exist.
The real reasons is undefined. But I think that most real reason it is decreasing of Bounty payments. ICO it is businesses and real reason should have clear economic sense.
Jump to: