The idea of KYC for Bounty hunters is a bit weird.
If there is a Bounty that requires KYC, it should be obviously announced initially in Bounty conditions.
Otherwise it looks unfair and can be considered as a red flag for the Bounty.
Topic: Bouty and KYC - page 17. (Read 2873 times)
Kyc is good for bounty it's just that it's good for the team management because they will be able to fish out scammers. But on the other hand disclosing one's Identity so as to receive token isn't good enough.
KYC has recently been asked to finish the bouty program. This makes it difficult to update people's information. For example, participants did not update information, or some people were afraid of giving out their information because it was confidential, or some KYC could not be updated because of some program error. .
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
or maybe the people on the bounty campaign just didnt ask if there would be a KYC program for the bounty you should ask first before joining in, asking doesnt hurt, bounty manager doesnt have any control for KYC the project decide if they will conduct it. With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
I do not like bounty campaigns that require KYC, but sadly many projects now require KYC to force the end of the project. This is uncomfortable for me and probably for all bounty hunters. I also agree with you the bounty manager should request KYC from the beginning when posting.
KYC is needed to avoid the scammer, regulator makes KYC and ICO project must do iti think there isnt problem if you re fair to do bounty, just simple step to fix KYC
It's fair to announce KYC before the start of the bounty, but unfortunately complaints never give you your time back, you should easily avoid the manager and do bounty somewhere else.
I agree on this. KYC should be announced before the program start so as to give a heads up to participants that it will be implementing one. Also, this is in consideration of the security risks involved for the participants who will give out their KYC information which is usually confidential in nature.
This is all, of course, correct. To declare that the KYC will be checked only at the end of the ICO, it is a fraud, a fraud, to a certain part of the participants who for various reasons do not want to pass it, do not pay the tokens they earned.However, it is also necessary to take into account that the requirement to pass a KYC test in respect of participants in the ICO generosity campaign is generally illegal. No document explicitly requires that such an audit be conducted for members of the ICO generosity campaign. We are not investors and therefore such an inspection against us should not be conducted.
KYC has recently been asked to finish the bouty program. This makes it difficult to update people's information. For example, participants did not update information, or some people were afraid of giving out their information because it was confidential, or some KYC could not be updated because of some program error. .
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
many users here are also asking why kyc is being announced at the end of the bounty program, and many people are against it. its true that if they require kyc they must announce it at the very first place.With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
but for me, bounty hunters dont really have to do kyc since bounty hunters must remain anonymous.
I do not like bounty campaigns that require KYC, but sadly many projects now require KYC to force the end of the project. This is uncomfortable for me and probably for all bounty hunters. I also agree with you the bounty manager should request KYC from the beginning when posting.
KYC- it's no longer a problem to create as many identical topics on this forum. Who doesn't want to submit their data - buy the necessary data on the black market , is really inexpensive. Unless , of course , you win $ 50 with a bounty. Then just photoshop it (your id) 
It happened on many campaign that KYC requirement is not be announce at the beginning of campaign. So, people who joining many campaign don't know information regarding KYC for bounty hunter amd they lost the tokens.
Real and reliable projects ask for KYC,I really appreciate this initiative because it helps to discourage the scammers having fake accounts in social media and Bitcointalk can be detected by KYC procedure.The real participants will be encouraged by KYC his or her performance will show how promoted the project.Other hand companies also know that is there real buyer or investor and positive use of investment.
to me it's normal! KYC It will not take long, you can spend some time to do it. Avoid cheating in bounty would be better.
KYC has recently been asked to finish the bouty program. This makes it difficult to update people's information. For example, participants did not update information, or some people were afraid of giving out their information because it was confidential, or some KYC could not be updated because of some program error. .
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
I agree with you completely, but you see they have a simple rule they may at their discretion change the rule any company you did the work and they can be as cunning as possible, the easiest example of this, they divide the tokens between all participants, and then all the checks on KYC and people who are not KYC get tokens, but tokens of their share to the remaining participants, this is a tricky economy without which this world would not exist. With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
I do not want to give my personal details to strangers. If at the end of the bounty campaign they ask me to pass KYC, I'd rather sacrifice coins.
In my opinion, the manager's bounty doesn't know if there is a Kyc requirement without getting a word from the developer. Sometimes the developer is late to announce information about Kyc, and this makes us confused and afraid to provide information about the Kyc requirements. I think Kyc is very good at avoiding fraud, and this is very helpful to reduce the actions of bounty participants who cheat.
It is unfair that the passage of KYC is announced at the end of the bounty program. For me, this is crucial in the decision to join the bounty program. If there is KYC - I do not participate. Because I do not trust to give my personal information to unknown persons on the Internet. I don't think it's safe. After all, hackers and scammers at every step.
I think That projects should announce all information from begin program.
Oh man. At first I thought this said KYC for Booty. LOL. I may actually send in my paperwork for that.
But on the big switcheroo at the end I feel as though the bounty manager should be given a negative trust for that one. That's pure deception. No one with a brain would send in KYC documents over the internet to a non government official so simply rip us off.
But on the big switcheroo at the end I feel as though the bounty manager should be given a negative trust for that one. That's pure deception. No one with a brain would send in KYC documents over the internet to a non government official so simply rip us off.
KYC to do it is a good thing,from KYC it also realize that the information that the person gave about himself is right or wrong . the company will also be able to work properly on those people who are working in it.they can get the facilities they need to give them in the right way. i agree to KYC.
I joined a lot of bounty campaign and more of them don't required kyc for all the bounty hunters. But some required to do the kyc for the reason that they have to know if you are not coming from the banned country and there is nothing wrong to do the kyc if they accepted the documents that not limited only for passport to verify the kyc. Because there are many hunters that have no passport and the only thing they have is ID.
Jump to: