As a boxing fan I both considered the ability of the fighter, skills, experiences and records of his fights and also the age of the fighter. It is undeniable that once a fighter has age it also slows downs his speed and lessen the strength which should a fighter must contain a high power and high strength to be able to win in the fight. I didn't say that Tyson is not a good fighter because if we were going to base on his records this man has an exceptional fight experience, however many bettors were concerning about his age.
Yes, I understand you. What you said is undeniable, when human beings get old it is normal for them to lose their agility, flexibility, among other things, after all, this happens to all of us (humans). It's almost certain that a 20 or 25 year old fighter can be faster than Tyson, I have no doubts, but experience and technique are important factors too!I believe the only attribute that he is likely to decrease gradually (not as fast as aging) but is the skill/experience of the player/fighter. (Of course, this is something relative)
I would think that Tyson would lose against a professional boxer, but against Logan Paul? I highly doubt that because the latter has no professional boxing experience, so he does not train hard like Tyson did when he was still active, with that said, I think Tyson would win without a question, but not sure if the KO will come since an exhibition fight might have some stipulation inside the contact that we don't know.
I'm sure this match is much more entertaining to see than Floyd vs Logan, because maybe Mike is going to show some hard blows and make Logan fall in his knees
