I don't quite get you. What do you mean how?
I am saying there will be no upset, meaning the huge underdog Lopez won't have a slim chance to beat the heavy favorite Loma. That's just what I am saying.
If the odds are almost the same, regardless of whoever wins the match, there will be no upset. In this case, I am saying there will be no upset because Lopez does not have a chance against Loma.
That odd are base with how Loma fought and with his advantage from his past experiences it's high chance for him to win, but that's not a guarantee since both fighters have equal training and both have time to condition and review there opponents capacities.
In any sports there's always favorite and underdog but who knows what will be the outcome until the final bell was there.
Of course no one knows the outcome of the game that's why there's always a thrill in betting and we are just taking the risk with out guess.
However, odds provider are not stupid to make Loma as the heavy favorites if they don't see him mostly capable of winning the fight, and I am pretty sure majority would agree that Loma should be the heavy favorites here and they will put money on it.
but they have to bet $400 just to win $100.. so if you are a better and you like Loma to win, would you bet on that odds?
No one knows the outcome of the game but everybody has his/her own analysis and prediction. Nobody would make a bet without it.
I would definitely be betting on that odds. If you think that the odds is not that attractive, that means it is most probably the winning odds. If you go for Lopez because of higher odds, that means you are betting on a choice which is more likely to lose. At the end of the day, the odds makers are making everything directly proportional.