Topic: [BOXING] Manny Pacquiao vs. DK Yoo - page 14. (Read 7960 times)

I'm not sure though if you have followed DK career, this is boxing not martial arts exhibitions, so in any case he will be at a disadvantage here because this is Manny's bread and butter to speak off.

Unique as in what? they will just stand in front of the ring and throw bombs, you can't used your legs here.

And obviously this is just an exhibition match so fans are going to buy this fight because of Manny Pacquiao.

Yes, and Manny Pacquiao's reputation won't be scathed even if this said issue will be revived numerous times in the future. He long proved his skills on the ring and there's no need to execute this kind of nonsense that Manny got helped by that referee because even if that allegations are true, I'm sure that Pacquiao has no idea about it all that he got some help during that fight as it was the people behind who orchestrated that stunt and used the referee as pawn.

Manny was Philippine’s fighter who was played all type of game till his age of 40. He was the only boxer to win the title at the age of 40.Out of his 72 matches he had played.He had won of 62 matches and its mean 9/10 matches he had won.Nearly 39 of his matches he had win with KO.It means nearly 50 percentage of matches he had won win KO. It’s show he is the best player in his period of time. He had won the most of the world record in his period of time. KO is not the easy one in the gambling, people with more knowledge know the way of gambling using the KO game to win more bet from it. It was essential one for the game.

He was destined to be a legend, so even if the story was true, Manny already proved everything in actions. He won the 8 divisions and that is something that all his fans and all those who are engaged in this sport will remember about him. The story that being told here is just another thing that will be forgotten after some time and it will not be remove the fact that how Manny has become from this sport.

Readers and viewers will be engaged for a while, then it will be forgotten since there's nothing about that cheating incident. It wasn't Manny who made it, but the ref and it's their position to decide on how to take the fight.

About this issues of manny pacmann pacquiao is already been running for investigation and both fighters involve that fight agreed each other to watch and have a good investigation of that fight because the referee it self that he helped manny pacman pacquiao and reduce the speed of his counting in order to pacman recover immediately from knockout, for me it's too late as we all know many pacman wants to retired. And what is the result of the investigation can not affect his leaving and career. He is the Legendary boxer with a record of 8 division Champion in the world which we all know that record is unbreakable even Inoue can not break that.

Maybe that's only his conscience and he just wants to speak of what happened. I can't blame him but if he's got that motive, it's too late for him to correct that one and both fighters won't feel anything with it because it's too long already.

The cheating was said on the referee's part because he said that he has helped Manny through slow counting. And on the opponent's side, he said that there's an investigation about counting and he said that he's slow and based on his counting, it should have been 16 seconds already if I'm right and recall what I've watched correctly. Whether there will be investigations and arguments being done about that fight, it wouldn't make sense anymore.

And maybe he thinks that Manny should feel indebted to him because if it's not for his help, Manny won't reach what he's got now. Well, I beg to differ.

It's not a big issue that will change on what Manny has achieved in boxing, he is still the greatest Filipino boxers and the only 8th division world champion, that alone would already erase whatever minor mistakes done in his favor in the past, Manny is still Manny and the people's champ, so he deserve huge respect.

Yes, there are no claims that Pacquaio did cheat on this fight, on the other hand his opponent is a dirty fighter.

And I think this is one reason why Padilla deliberately took long time to count and even deduct points on Hussein because of how dirty he is against Manny Pacquiao on that fight. So this is a punishment for him, and it just so happen that it was Manny that Hussein is fighting.

But we shouldn't recounted this old story though, this events didn't change what Manny will become in the future.

The truth is I didn't know that the gloves for the exhibition fights had to be heavier, simply as it is an exhibition fight I thought that since it is a practically fixed fight there would be no problem with that, but if I rescue the fact that they have to be heavier Although I don't know, but I think that no matter how carefully they put the gloves on Pacquiao, he has enough strength to be able to pick them up and land a few blows with real power. Of course this is something that should not be assumed, but do you think that an exhibition fight gets out of control and boxers take it as if it were a real fight?


Well that is a great clarification, for me there is nothing strange there either, certain things can become shady, but we are talking about one of the best in the world that is Pacquiao, this is something almost conspiratorial, people always want to take advantage of what that is presented, it is very easy to be able to start speaking ill of someone with very little, if that did not explode at that moment, which was when the pot should have been uncovered, now it no longer makes sense, it is a legend, that is like fighting the Maradona's hand in a World Cup when he scored the goal, if at that moment they earned that irregularity nothing can be done today.

It's too late though for Padilla, but he could be saying the truth here. Usually we have seen this kind of biased judgement by a referee in the Casimero vs Akaho fight.

And there are fights that I have seen that the referee took more than 10 counts to a certain fighter because he has his reasons. In any case, this is history already and Manny didn't cheat in this fight. And history can't really be stop, it's Manny path to be one of the greats of boxing right now.

Exactly, that motivates referee Padilla to just come out in the open and admit that he deliberately make Manny win his fight against Hussein?

It's kinda late though, and why wait when Manny has retired? is he  really protecting Manny that much that he was silence all this years when Manny is fighting at a pro level? Doesn't really make sense for us for Padilla's revelation. He should have bury this one already.

If we watch the fight closely,  there is no cheating on part of Manny Pacquiao, instead there are lots of dirty tactics that Hussein has used against Manny.  Hussein disqualification is actually due but the referee is too lenient and did not do it until the fight is stopped due to deep cut on the eye of Hussein.

Anything about cheating has nothing to do with Manny because he is just a boxer who is doing his best to win the fight.  With the knockdown, its been explained during that Wilder and Tyson  match that there is no 10 sec. knockdown count rule, how long the count is on the referee's discretion while assessing the boxer if he can still continue or not.  In addition as the earlier replies stated, Manny stand up even before the 10 sec expires. 

So literally, there is no cheating in the fight at all.  I don't understand what happened and Carlos Padilla had stated that they help Manny to win the fight.

This do really boggles up our mind on how the heck that 2000's boxing fight been recalled now with those issues.Even that referree is trying out to wreck Pacquiaos reputation but it is really that too late
considering that he had already retired. Wrecking up his reputation is useless, it did really sure get some attention but we us fans wont really be bothered up that much with this issue.
Its already over and trying out to say about cheating then it wont really something major that will affect on the image that he had built up for decades.
Well for some but not really that a major thing.

While the issue has been called for, these two boxers that are involved didn't think of it that much. But the attention that the referee did was greatly noticed by the world.
I don't also understand the motive of the referee for why telling it late. He should have said that earlier when he's still credible at that time but who knows, if he just wants to have the attention or he took it for so many years and it's a sigh to him when he's said that.

Obviously, his intentions is to give a bad image to Pacquiao's figure and scathe his name by dragging his name, and reviving the issue once again after all these years. I will be not convinced even if the referee will say that he cannot be like that forever and that he has good intention as he had all the time to reveal it, why now? Also, it's quite too late if his motive is to drag Pacquiao's name on his mess.

I am not surprised that Manny has that black dot in his white boxing history. It is not a secret that boxing is corrupted and has numerous background stories. This is all because of money. Where big money are, the are always high chances of something shady to happen. It is not a secret that managers "influence" fighters record to have their prospect being popular longer. if we admin that Hussein won that fight, I dont think that Manny's career would go down, but Husseins up.

In fact, in that fight Hussein did lots of dirty boxing. Maybe the ref gave Manny those extra second to make their chances even. Maybe. Who knows.

It will not change anything though, Manny still our favorite boxer as he brings honor to our country, as a referee who has a clean conscience, he should have expose that early. I'm just curious, after how many years, why did he expose it now? What's his intention on doing that?

With regards to the alleged cheating told by referee Padilla about helping Pacquiao to win his match against Nedal Hussein. I've watched an episode of KMJS a popular magazine show here in the Philippines. He said that he didn't feel anything about cheating there and it's not on him because he's just doing his job as a boxer. Whilst for Hussein, he's got some feeling that he's been cheated and as well as Manny. He's not blaming Manny on it but the referee himself, well, both have moved on already from that issue.

The eldest daughter of Carlos Padilla, stated that his father's statement were misunderstood, but I think it is not for her to interpret what his father has stated.  It is clear that Padilla stated that they cheated Hussein by making the count delay longer and by stopping the fight regardless of Hussein being able to continue or not. But looking at the video, I do not think there is any cheating that happened.  As stated on the earlier reply, there is no 10 seconds knockdown count rule.   The rule is 10 count knockdown and not 10 sec. count knockdown, it is up to the referee on how long he will count till 10.  The stoppage is already due, the cut of Hussein is too deep that it can result in a permanent damage if the fight continues.

Manny Pacquiao is right, they did not cheat, but they were favored.  besides the statement of Carlos Padilla of extending the count to 18 seconds is wrong. Check the video from Bitcoinpanther reply

It is that this can be seen as a double-edged sword, because the truth is that in a bet on this fight, the most logical thing is that Pacquiao wins, but since everything is a show, he can very well lose, which is not frowned upon, the most ´it will be for the gamblers, and this is what I like about exhibition fights, that anything can happen here, these things can be taken as high risk if you want to make very high bets, if it is for this ´I would prefer betting on fights that are legitimate, for me it is safer and I think it gives much more adrenaline to do so, than losing money or possibly losing money in an exhibition fight that is much sadder.


Well, we all know the level that Pacquiao has in any fight, he is a very good boxer, I understand that there are many things that some verify at a technical level, and I don't blame them, I know that victories at a technical level are decisive, but Most of us here know what the Filipino is like, he is a boxer who is very transparent, we know he is a legend, he has a lot that I think he can prove, yes, I am a believer that Pacquiao still has a lot to prove and that he can continue to do so. Some say that he is very old, but I think that is not the case, the older a boxer is, the more experience and seniority he has.

Manny Pacquiao denies cheating allegations made by veteran boxing referee: “We didn’t cheat, we were just favored”





Source: https://c.newsnow.co.uk/A/1156895171?-18341:15554:latest_news