Except, you haven't actually refuted any of the points I've made. You support forcing a female dog to be raped and chopping a dog's balls off without a care about it, even if the animal resists, but sex is rape, even if the animal doesn't protest?
I don't believe in "owning" pets at all, much less forced breeding or castration.
Now back to your disgusting perversion; when did you first notice that you were attracted to animals?
You do realize that's like asking, "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" It's a loaded question.
Even if I was attracted to real animals, which I'm not, where is this going?
[a human having sex with an animal] is rape, even if the animal doesn't protest?
Yes.
Now tell me why. Obviously animals can consent to sex, as they have sex within their species all the time. Besides the reasoning 'most people think it's icky, so it must be wrong', what's wrong with it?
Sorry, cartoon animals (which is a completely different thing).
Why? Because, like a child, mentally ill person, or someone drunk or drugged, they are not capable of consent. In addition, their inability to effectively communicate wants, needs, and so forth clearly means they can not vocalize consent (even if they were capable).
Do you really think that not moving, attacking, or running away counts as consent? I guess it's free game on people who are drunk or drugged..." No officer, I know she was in a drug stupor, but she didn't run when I penetrated her, so it's not rape".
